Worst Developers Machines
-
I think that developers should be issued nothing better than a Pentium 2. That way, when their product goes to market, instead of customers not being able to run it, because it requires the biggest, fastest computers, if it's to to crawl out of its box, it'll go like sh1t off a shovel. Result: Happier customers, and better-paid devs. Suck it in and use the worst one.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Hi all, Just out of curiosity which is your worst developer machine? In our room, 3 developers, 10 machines [2 Core2Duo, 2 Pentium D & 6 Pentium 4], the best developers machine is Core2Duo E7300 4Gb ram and the worse machine is: Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz, 2GB, Time taken to boot a windows server 2008 is 4 minutes. NOTE that in our organization there is an impression that we have the best machines :doh:
Our "worst" dev machine is a Samung netbook - it takes over an hour to do a full rebuild of our main solution (330kLOC in 29 projects) on it, and (of course) has an absolutely tiny screen. On the plus side the battery life is immense so you can do smaller development tasks on it while travelling without fuss (I was doing exactly that while travelling yesterday, in fact). By comparison my main dev box (a dual core Win2k8 Opteron with 5GB RAM) builds the same code in about 20 minutes and the i7 based laptop (which I've just had to return with a graphics adaptor fault - damn!) in a quite astonishing 9.5 minutes. The Opteron is a good compromise between speed and realism though; it's a nice and easy to expand machine (HP Proliant Server) and I can't see myself replacing it for a while yet.
Anna :rose: Tech Blog | Visual Lint "Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"
-
Hi all, Just out of curiosity which is your worst developer machine? In our room, 3 developers, 10 machines [2 Core2Duo, 2 Pentium D & 6 Pentium 4], the best developers machine is Core2Duo E7300 4Gb ram and the worse machine is: Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz, 2GB, Time taken to boot a windows server 2008 is 4 minutes. NOTE that in our organization there is an impression that we have the best machines :doh:
This is the same situation in our office. I think this is not so bad, because you have take into account machines that will run your code may not be as good as yuors.
Behzad
-
Hi all, Just out of curiosity which is your worst developer machine? In our room, 3 developers, 10 machines [2 Core2Duo, 2 Pentium D & 6 Pentium 4], the best developers machine is Core2Duo E7300 4Gb ram and the worse machine is: Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz, 2GB, Time taken to boot a windows server 2008 is 4 minutes. NOTE that in our organization there is an impression that we have the best machines :doh:
First dev machine... Windows XP, Pentium 3 processor @ 800 MHz, 256 MB of RAM.... running two instances of vs2005 and an instance of firefox 2.x (the bloated generation) Your move.
-
Hi all, Just out of curiosity which is your worst developer machine? In our room, 3 developers, 10 machines [2 Core2Duo, 2 Pentium D & 6 Pentium 4], the best developers machine is Core2Duo E7300 4Gb ram and the worse machine is: Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz, 2GB, Time taken to boot a windows server 2008 is 4 minutes. NOTE that in our organization there is an impression that we have the best machines :doh:
Albert Bezzina wrote:
Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz, 2GB, Time taken to boot a windows server 2008 is 4 minutes.
That is IDENTICAL to the computer I had when I first started here! An old Dell Optiplex GX620. Only, it was running XP, not a server OS. But, still, excruciatingly slow... Fortunately, they upgraded my within a couple of months to a Dell Precision T3500 with Windows 7 x64 a Xeon processor and 4GB RAM. Of course, the old one is still on my desk for me to abuse from time to time...although I haven't turned it on in months.
-
Hi all, Just out of curiosity which is your worst developer machine? In our room, 3 developers, 10 machines [2 Core2Duo, 2 Pentium D & 6 Pentium 4], the best developers machine is Core2Duo E7300 4Gb ram and the worse machine is: Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz, 2GB, Time taken to boot a windows server 2008 is 4 minutes. NOTE that in our organization there is an impression that we have the best machines :doh:
My work machine: :zzz: Intel Core2 Duo @ 2.54 GHz 4GB Ram 32-bit Vista Enterprize 240GB Hard Drive My Home Machine: :cool: AMD PhenomII X6 6-core CPU @ 3.0GHz 8GB 1600MHz Ram 64-bit Win7 Ultimate 5.5TB Hard Drives (1.5+2+2) Ding Ding Ding Ding - I win! ;P I guess I take this stuff more seriously than my boss (US Gov't) does.
-
Hi all, Just out of curiosity which is your worst developer machine? In our room, 3 developers, 10 machines [2 Core2Duo, 2 Pentium D & 6 Pentium 4], the best developers machine is Core2Duo E7300 4Gb ram and the worse machine is: Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz, 2GB, Time taken to boot a windows server 2008 is 4 minutes. NOTE that in our organization there is an impression that we have the best machines :doh:
Where I work we have custom OS version of Windows (higher levels of security and secret stuff too) so boot up time on my lap is a range from 10 to 20 minutes (vista usually boots from 20 to 40 min ) (Dell e6400 Core 2 Duo 2.66 Ghz 4GB Ram) so dont come to me with long boot times
Edgar Prieto Software Engineer
-
I know a company that still has a 286 machine it uses for printing labels! It must be 15 years old and still works.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC League Table Link CCC Link[^]
I maintain a networked system for a large independent video store. It's all built with 8088 machines that use Lantastic cards. Yeah. Runs on DOS 6.2. The video rental business is dying and the owner has no interest in upgrading. He wants to ride this system until it dies or the store dies. I had to replace one of the 3 machines in the network a year ago and was pulling my hair out, until I found a local guy who had a boatload of working Pentium II's in his garage. I bought two of them. Had to pick ones that still had an ISA bus. Not too many Pentium II machines have ISA buses. I pulled the Lantastic card out of the broken 8088 and stuck it in one of the Pentium II machines, did a bunch of upper memory address exclusion with EMM386, and things are back in business. Total hardware cost, including new (used) hard drive that is much larger than a DOS machine can see: $45. So: Pentium II, 1 MB, LANtastic, Dos 6.2. That's my worst machine. And I had to do some development on it for a quick custom app for this store, but I was able to do it in QBasic. So it qualifies. It is so weird when that store calls me for more support. I have to dig down deep into my brain, thinking in early 1990s ways, to support them.
-
Hi all, Just out of curiosity which is your worst developer machine? In our room, 3 developers, 10 machines [2 Core2Duo, 2 Pentium D & 6 Pentium 4], the best developers machine is Core2Duo E7300 4Gb ram and the worse machine is: Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz, 2GB, Time taken to boot a windows server 2008 is 4 minutes. NOTE that in our organization there is an impression that we have the best machines :doh: