Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. What a president of the past did to corporate criminals

What a president of the past did to corporate criminals

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
phpcomquestion
17 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T TheGreatAndPowerfulOz

    That's because that was an illegal, dictatorial action by Roosevelt.

    "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams "Let me get this straight. You know her. She knows you. But she wants to eat him. And everybody's okay with this?"

    modified on Friday, February 4, 2011 2:28 PM

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    ahmed zahmed wrote:

    That's because that's was an illegal, dictatorial action by Roosevelt.

    No, the seizure of Montgomery Ward's plant was made under the War Labor Disputes Act 1943, and upheld by the US Court of Appeals. As Commander-in-Chief of the US Army, I assume the President has the authority to command his troops to remove the CEO? I would have thought a civilian agency to have been more proper, but there was a War on, and this guy was being obstructive.

    2011 - Our best hope is that things will be frightening and dangerous rather than desperate and horrific. Jesse's Café Américain

    T 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • W wolfbinary

      http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9551335[^] I don't think we'll ever see this.

      That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

      P Offline
      P Offline
      puromtec1
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      Go to Venezuela.

      W 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        ahmed zahmed wrote:

        That's because that's was an illegal, dictatorial action by Roosevelt.

        No, the seizure of Montgomery Ward's plant was made under the War Labor Disputes Act 1943, and upheld by the US Court of Appeals. As Commander-in-Chief of the US Army, I assume the President has the authority to command his troops to remove the CEO? I would have thought a civilian agency to have been more proper, but there was a War on, and this guy was being obstructive.

        2011 - Our best hope is that things will be frightening and dangerous rather than desperate and horrific. Jesse's Café Américain

        T Offline
        T Offline
        TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Wrong! Failure of Due Process. Failure under Unreasonable Search and Seizure. The War Labor Disputes Act of 1943 was most certainly unconstitutional then and would certainly fail in the courts today.

        "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams "Let me get this straight. You know her. She knows you. But she wants to eat him. And everybody's okay with this?"

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T TheGreatAndPowerfulOz

          That's because that was an illegal, dictatorial action by Roosevelt.

          "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams "Let me get this straight. You know her. She knows you. But she wants to eat him. And everybody's okay with this?"

          modified on Friday, February 4, 2011 2:28 PM

          P Offline
          P Offline
          puromtec1
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          No surprise, coming from an administration that involved a guy like Alger Hiss.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T TheGreatAndPowerfulOz

            Wrong! Failure of Due Process. Failure under Unreasonable Search and Seizure. The War Labor Disputes Act of 1943 was most certainly unconstitutional then and would certainly fail in the courts today.

            "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams "Let me get this straight. You know her. She knows you. But she wants to eat him. And everybody's okay with this?"

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            ahmed zahmed wrote:

            The War Labor Disputes Act of 1943 was most certainly unconstitutional then

            A US District Court ruled that the President did not have the right to to seize the factory, but this was reversed on appeal. The US Supreme Court dismissed the case as moot, President Truman having, by then, terminated the seizure.

            ahmed zahmed wrote:

            Failure of Due Process. Failure under Unreasonable Search and Seizure.

            Presumably considered by the US Court of Appeal - I leave the determination of this to you, as an exercise.

            ahmed zahmed wrote:

            and would certainly fail in the courts today

            Which is irrelevant to what happened during WW2. "The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there."

            2011 - Our best hope is that things will be frightening and dangerous rather than desperate and horrific. Jesse's Café Américain

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • W wolfbinary

              http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9551335[^] I don't think we'll ever see this.

              That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Majerus
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              wolfbinary wrote:

              I don't think we'll ever see this.

              It does seem unlikely. People with money and power(they pretty much go together) have a much different relationship to the law than you or I. Whether it's war crimes or crashing the economy, it's "Look forward, not back". Maybe if I rob an armored car of $40 million my lawyer can argue that we need to look forward and I will get the charges dismissed. :)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P puromtec1

                Go to Venezuela.

                W Offline
                W Offline
                wolfbinary
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                No. ;P

                That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  ahmed zahmed wrote:

                  The War Labor Disputes Act of 1943 was most certainly unconstitutional then

                  A US District Court ruled that the President did not have the right to to seize the factory, but this was reversed on appeal. The US Supreme Court dismissed the case as moot, President Truman having, by then, terminated the seizure.

                  ahmed zahmed wrote:

                  Failure of Due Process. Failure under Unreasonable Search and Seizure.

                  Presumably considered by the US Court of Appeal - I leave the determination of this to you, as an exercise.

                  ahmed zahmed wrote:

                  and would certainly fail in the courts today

                  Which is irrelevant to what happened during WW2. "The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there."

                  2011 - Our best hope is that things will be frightening and dangerous rather than desperate and horrific. Jesse's Café Américain

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  TheGreatAndPowerfulOz
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  ict558 wrote:

                  President Truman having, by then, terminated the seizure

                  Because it was illegal in the first place, you dolt!

                  "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams "Let me get this straight. You know her. She knows you. But she wants to eat him. And everybody's okay with this?"

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • T TheGreatAndPowerfulOz

                    ict558 wrote:

                    President Truman having, by then, terminated the seizure

                    Because it was illegal in the first place, you dolt!

                    "If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams "Let me get this straight. You know her. She knows you. But she wants to eat him. And everybody's okay with this?"

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    ahmed zahmed wrote:

                    Because it was illegal in the first place

                    Japan formally surrendered September 2, 1945, ending WW2. At the end of WW2, all seizures had to be terminated. The Montgomery Ward seizure was terminated in October, 1945.

                    ahmed zahmed wrote:

                    you dolt

                    You're too kind.

                    2011 - Our best hope is that things will be frightening and dangerous rather than desperate and horrific. Jesse's Café Américain

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • W wolfbinary

                      Apparently he missed the fact that FDR had him arrested not sentenced.

                      That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Nagy Vilmos
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      wolfbinary wrote:

                      Apparently he missed the fact that FDR had him arrested not sentencedschool.

                      ftfy


                      Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups