Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C#
  4. Please can someone do me a favour and run a C# test for me

Please can someone do me a favour and run a C# test for me

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C#
csharplinuxhelp
11 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dave Midgley
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I realise this sounds a bit pathetic, but I have developed a workaround for a weakness in the pictureBox class, and I will publish it as an article on CodeProject. However I haven't yet upgraded from VC2005 (as a freelancer I am having trouble getting work in these straightened times and don't reall want to shell out for VS2010 just at the moment). Before I publish I would like to check whether the problem has been solved in later versions of .NET. I have a test program all ready. If someone with VS2010 could spare half an hour to run the test it would save me wasting my and everyone else's time on an unecessary article.

    Dave

    OriginalGriffO P D 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • D Dave Midgley

      I realise this sounds a bit pathetic, but I have developed a workaround for a weakness in the pictureBox class, and I will publish it as an article on CodeProject. However I haven't yet upgraded from VC2005 (as a freelancer I am having trouble getting work in these straightened times and don't reall want to shell out for VS2010 just at the moment). Before I publish I would like to check whether the problem has been solved in later versions of .NET. I have a test program all ready. If someone with VS2010 could spare half an hour to run the test it would save me wasting my and everyone else's time on an unecessary article.

      Dave

      OriginalGriffO Offline
      OriginalGriffO Offline
      OriginalGriff
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      VS2010 comes in Express versions http://www.microsoft.com/express/Downloads/[^] - that way you can evaluate your software at no charge to you...

      Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Digital man: "You are, in short, an idiot with the IQ of an ant and the intellectual capacity of a hose pipe."

      "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
      "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Dave Midgley

        I realise this sounds a bit pathetic, but I have developed a workaround for a weakness in the pictureBox class, and I will publish it as an article on CodeProject. However I haven't yet upgraded from VC2005 (as a freelancer I am having trouble getting work in these straightened times and don't reall want to shell out for VS2010 just at the moment). Before I publish I would like to check whether the problem has been solved in later versions of .NET. I have a test program all ready. If someone with VS2010 could spare half an hour to run the test it would save me wasting my and everyone else's time on an unecessary article.

        Dave

        P Offline
        P Offline
        PIEBALDconsult
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        You don't need Visual Studio to compile against .net anyway. I recommend learning to make do without it.

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

          VS2010 comes in Express versions http://www.microsoft.com/express/Downloads/[^] - that way you can evaluate your software at no charge to you...

          Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Digital man: "You are, in short, an idiot with the IQ of an ant and the intellectual capacity of a hose pipe."

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dave Midgley
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Doh!. Thanks OriginalGriff. I didn't even realise they did a free Express version. That's done the trick. What an idiot!!

          Dave

          OriginalGriffO 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P PIEBALDconsult

            You don't need Visual Studio to compile against .net anyway. I recommend learning to make do without it.

            D Offline
            D Offline
            Dave Midgley
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Interesting! What do you use then?

            Dave

            OriginalGriffO L P 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • D Dave Midgley

              Doh!. Thanks OriginalGriff. I didn't even realise they did a free Express version. That's done the trick. What an idiot!!

              Dave

              OriginalGriffO Offline
              OriginalGriffO Offline
              OriginalGriff
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Welcome!

              Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Digital man: "You are, in short, an idiot with the IQ of an ant and the intellectual capacity of a hose pipe."

              "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
              "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Dave Midgley

                Interesting! What do you use then?

                Dave

                OriginalGriffO Offline
                OriginalGriffO Offline
                OriginalGriff
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                csc.exe (C Sharp Compiler) is included in each version of the .NET framework. Command line only, but it works.

                Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Digital man: "You are, in short, an idiot with the IQ of an ant and the intellectual capacity of a hose pipe."

                "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
                "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Dave Midgley

                  Interesting! What do you use then?

                  Dave

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Dave Midgley wrote:

                  What do you use then?

                  You need to understand the difference between Visual Studio, which is an IDE, and csc which is the compiler. You can use both independently, although you need the compiler to build projects from within VS.

                  I must get a clever new signature for 2011.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Dave Midgley

                    I realise this sounds a bit pathetic, but I have developed a workaround for a weakness in the pictureBox class, and I will publish it as an article on CodeProject. However I haven't yet upgraded from VC2005 (as a freelancer I am having trouble getting work in these straightened times and don't reall want to shell out for VS2010 just at the moment). Before I publish I would like to check whether the problem has been solved in later versions of .NET. I have a test program all ready. If someone with VS2010 could spare half an hour to run the test it would save me wasting my and everyone else's time on an unecessary article.

                    Dave

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Dave Kreskowiak
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Dave Midgley wrote:

                    but I have developed a workaround for a weakness in the pictureBox class

                    The only weakness with the PictureBox class is actually using it. It's the most over-abused control in the entire ToolBox. What weakness are you talking about?

                    A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
                    Dave Kreskowiak

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Dave Midgley

                      Interesting! What do you use then?

                      Dave

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      PIEBALDconsult
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Right, I compile at the command line[^], like a real man. Compiling WinForms applications is more complex, and I haven't written anything about it, but it's not a big deal. Otherwise, I recommend using an Express edition.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Dave Kreskowiak

                        Dave Midgley wrote:

                        but I have developed a workaround for a weakness in the pictureBox class

                        The only weakness with the PictureBox class is actually using it. It's the most over-abused control in the entire ToolBox. What weakness are you talking about?

                        A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
                        Dave Kreskowiak

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Dave Midgley
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        I agree it's not very good. I was quite surprised to find that it does actually support animated GIFs, and then unsurprised to find that it doesn't support them properly by implementing a non-infinite number of loops.

                        Dave

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups