Browser usage
-
"Know your customers" is rule #1 in business. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
-
Aamir Butt wrote:
The stats of tech sites will be biased against IE anyway.
You are implying that people who about such things wouldn't touch IE with a barge pole?
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
More likely we don't accept the default and have a tendency to try a wider range of tools. Joe Public will normally accept the default and bitch at you if you change their favourite tool.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
these stats are biased; w3schools is all about standards, of course IE numbers would be low. And yes Chris has CP numbers, first there is GoogleAnalytics, and second I trust he keeps track himself too. It would indeed be nice to have them available in a pretty graph versus time; actually I'd like to have two, one with all versions separate, the other aggregated by browser family. :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
-
I remember a post a couple of months back, i think it was from Nishant, asking if Chris would publish some of the CP GA stats, did he [chris] ever post any?
Dave Find Me On: Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn
Folding Stats: Team CodeProject
Not that I can recall. Anyway it always sounded like Chris was determined to support all kinds of browsers, including IE6 which is/was very popular in the East; this would make stats less relevant. I also am sensing he is getting somewhat less determined recently. You are referring to this thread[^]? :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
-
Not that I can recall. Anyway it always sounded like Chris was determined to support all kinds of browsers, including IE6 which is/was very popular in the East; this would make stats less relevant. I also am sensing he is getting somewhat less determined recently. You are referring to this thread[^]? :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
Yeh, thats the thread that started it off, then it moved to SB+S and a post was submitted there. http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3718001/Suggestion-CP-log-analysis-for-2010.aspx[^]
Dave Find Me On: Web|Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn
Folding Stats: Team CodeProject
-
Not that I can recall. Anyway it always sounded like Chris was determined to support all kinds of browsers, including IE6 which is/was very popular in the East; this would make stats less relevant. I also am sensing he is getting somewhat less determined recently. You are referring to this thread[^]? :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
Luc Pattyn wrote:
IE6 which is/was very popular in the East
Norfolk?
-
Luc Pattyn wrote:
IE6 which is/was very popular in the East
Norfolk?
you said it, wherever the Windows pirates live... :)
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
-
Leave it to an accountant to bring numerical reality into the equation.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
-
The stats are for w3schools.com which is a website related (in some way) to programming. It would be nice to have these statistics from some other general-purpose website such as bbc, yahoo, google etc to see the real trend. The stats of tech sites will be biased against IE anyway.
I found out from my companies logs that we actually have customers still running a combination of Win95 with IE 5.5...
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
-
Here are some interesting stats: http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp[^] Chrome is very nearly more popular than IE. Ok, these are taken from a single site's visitor logs, but the trend there is pretty clear: IE and Firefox are loosing ground steadily, and most of it is going to Google... Interesting to see what they are for this place, assuming the hamsters write it down each time!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
I'll try to make a point of visiting there more freqently to represent for IE.
-
The stats are for w3schools.com which is a website related (in some way) to programming. It would be nice to have these statistics from some other general-purpose website such as bbc, yahoo, google etc to see the real trend. The stats of tech sites will be biased against IE anyway.
-
-
Only when they support their own prejudices. But isn't that statistically true at large?
-
Here are some interesting stats: http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp[^] Chrome is very nearly more popular than IE. Ok, these are taken from a single site's visitor logs, but the trend there is pretty clear: IE and Firefox are loosing ground steadily, and most of it is going to Google... Interesting to see what they are for this place, assuming the hamsters write it down each time!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
I have stats from a non-tech website (it's for a running group made up of everyone from stay at home moms to engineers and lawyers). Stats from the past year show (for 4300 visits, 2000 unique visitors): IE: 64.4% Safari: 14.5% Firefox: 16.1% Chrome: 4.4% I don't know any non-tech people that use Chrome, so these stats seem a little more legit than the typical tech-site based ones I usually see. Cheers, Drew.
