Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. I wonder if OBL

I wonder if OBL

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
question
26 Posts 8 Posters 91 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Slacker007

    shit his pants before or after he was executed? It's only natural that some of the Pakistan Government and military talk shit about the United States after we embarrassed the crap out of them. Whether or not our military went about this operation the right way, means absolutely nothing to me (in this case) because it resulted in the execution of walking turd nugget. What do you do with a turd? You flush it down the toilet not take it to court.

    -- You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a specialist.

    I Offline
    I Offline
    Ian Shlasko
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    I dunno... It would have been kinda cool if they brought him back alive, and then executed him on live TV, while some guy in a bowling shirt yelled[^], "This is what happens when you #%*(&# a stranger in the #*%&!"

    Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
    Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Slacker007

      shit his pants before or after he was executed? It's only natural that some of the Pakistan Government and military talk shit about the United States after we embarrassed the crap out of them. Whether or not our military went about this operation the right way, means absolutely nothing to me (in this case) because it resulted in the execution of walking turd nugget. What do you do with a turd? You flush it down the toilet not take it to court.

      -- You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a specialist.

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Rajesh R Subramanian
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Slacker007 wrote:

      Whether or not our military went about this operation the right way, means absolutely nothing to me

      Actually, it means a lot. The US military tried to kill him several times in the past. Pakistan was purportedly an ally of the US for each such operation that was executed (that cost HUGE amounts of money), and the US shared military intelligence with Pakistan as they "needed" to know what, and how is going to happen too. This time around, it appeared that the US had a little doubt over Pakistan's "support" and they went on with the operation WITHOUT keeping the Pakistani government in loop. The result was obvious, and it gives rise to many questions. As an Indian who has lived for several years next to a country that harbours terrorists, I can tell you that you guys did the correct thing in distrusting Pakistan in this operation.

      "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

      S D U 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • R Rajesh R Subramanian

        Slacker007 wrote:

        Whether or not our military went about this operation the right way, means absolutely nothing to me

        Actually, it means a lot. The US military tried to kill him several times in the past. Pakistan was purportedly an ally of the US for each such operation that was executed (that cost HUGE amounts of money), and the US shared military intelligence with Pakistan as they "needed" to know what, and how is going to happen too. This time around, it appeared that the US had a little doubt over Pakistan's "support" and they went on with the operation WITHOUT keeping the Pakistani government in loop. The result was obvious, and it gives rise to many questions. As an Indian who has lived for several years next to a country that harbours terrorists, I can tell you that you guys did the correct thing in distrusting Pakistan in this operation.

        "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Slacker007
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        I'm sure you know this already but the United States did this mission without Pakistan's involement because Pakistan Government and local police are corrupt and they would have alerted OBL before we arrived to perform the mission. Actually, it still means nothing to me. I am glad he was executed and his body donated as fish food. Fuck him.

        -- You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a specialist.

        R 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • S Slacker007

          I'm sure you know this already but the United States did this mission without Pakistan's involement because Pakistan Government and local police are corrupt and they would have alerted OBL before we arrived to perform the mission. Actually, it still means nothing to me. I am glad he was executed and his body donated as fish food. Fuck him.

          -- You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a specialist.

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Rajesh R Subramanian
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Slacker007 wrote:

          I'm sure you know this already but the United States did this mission without Pakistan's involement because Pakistan Government and local police are corrupt and they would have alerted OBL before we arrived to perform the mission.

          I knew it, and that's why I said you guys did the right thing by distrusting those little bastards this time around. Also, at many places in Pakistan, there was chaos and panic, and they were burning the US flag because they "murdered" their leader. I think a gunship flying around, shooting the heck out of those bastards would have been appropriate. Another annoying thing was that the "islamic religious leaders" around the world were complaining because this piece of shit's body isn't being buried according to islamic rituals. Seriously, WTF?! :wtf: At least his crappy body was being used as food for some fishes and crabs, which I think is more than what that body deserved. His soul can then go STRAIGHT to hell after that.

          "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Slacker007

            I'm sure you know this already but the United States did this mission without Pakistan's involement because Pakistan Government and local police are corrupt and they would have alerted OBL before we arrived to perform the mission. Actually, it still means nothing to me. I am glad he was executed and his body donated as fish food. Fuck him.

            -- You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a specialist.

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Rajesh R Subramanian
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            At times I wish I weren't living in this country of mine, because there's way too much sensitivity and "love for peace". I love the US for what they do in these matters. One of the terrorists who was captured in the Mumbai attacks is still being kept in prison and his trial is on. Seriously, WTF?! I wish they fuck peace this one time and shoot the hell out of him, or release him to the public and have them tear him apart into pieces.

            "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

            T D 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • R Rajesh R Subramanian

              At times I wish I weren't living in this country of mine, because there's way too much sensitivity and "love for peace". I love the US for what they do in these matters. One of the terrorists who was captured in the Mumbai attacks is still being kept in prison and his trial is on. Seriously, WTF?! I wish they fuck peace this one time and shoot the hell out of him, or release him to the public and have them tear him apart into pieces.

              "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

              T Offline
              T Offline
              Tarun K S
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:

              One of the terrorists who was captured in the Mumbai attacks is still being kept in prison and his trial is on.

              Crores are spent for his "safety" and he wants to have "chicken biryani". Although the judgement had been given that he will be hanged, he is still waiting in a long line, 13th position to be precise. Me thinks he will never be hanged and will die in prison itself, just like others. :sigh:

              The more anger towards the past you carry in your heart, the less capable you are of loving in the present. My Blog![^]

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Rajesh R Subramanian

                Slacker007 wrote:

                Whether or not our military went about this operation the right way, means absolutely nothing to me

                Actually, it means a lot. The US military tried to kill him several times in the past. Pakistan was purportedly an ally of the US for each such operation that was executed (that cost HUGE amounts of money), and the US shared military intelligence with Pakistan as they "needed" to know what, and how is going to happen too. This time around, it appeared that the US had a little doubt over Pakistan's "support" and they went on with the operation WITHOUT keeping the Pakistani government in loop. The result was obvious, and it gives rise to many questions. As an Indian who has lived for several years next to a country that harbours terrorists, I can tell you that you guys did the correct thing in distrusting Pakistan in this operation.

                "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

                D Offline
                D Offline
                dan sh
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Although it is good that OBL is dead, but there are problems. Now, if there is some kind of outburst in Pakistan and US thinks to attack them just like Iraq or Afghanistan, India will have a lot problems. Pakistan is almost over and this thing accelerated very quickly after US attack on Afghan. I suspect similar to happen in border states especially Punjab and Rajasthan. BTW I totally agree with your comment of not including double-faced Pak government.

                "The worst code you'll come across is code you wrote last year.", wizardzz[^]

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Rajesh R Subramanian

                  At times I wish I weren't living in this country of mine, because there's way too much sensitivity and "love for peace". I love the US for what they do in these matters. One of the terrorists who was captured in the Mumbai attacks is still being kept in prison and his trial is on. Seriously, WTF?! I wish they fuck peace this one time and shoot the hell out of him, or release him to the public and have them tear him apart into pieces.

                  "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  dan sh
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  That is how we work. It is sad but true. I would have been happy if one of the policemen would have brutally shot him dead on a surveillance camera. A bloody battered body and devilish laugh would have set great new image and probably a bit of fear in other similar fuckers.

                  "The worst code you'll come across is code you wrote last year.", wizardzz[^]

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D dan sh

                    Although it is good that OBL is dead, but there are problems. Now, if there is some kind of outburst in Pakistan and US thinks to attack them just like Iraq or Afghanistan, India will have a lot problems. Pakistan is almost over and this thing accelerated very quickly after US attack on Afghan. I suspect similar to happen in border states especially Punjab and Rajasthan. BTW I totally agree with your comment of not including double-faced Pak government.

                    "The worst code you'll come across is code you wrote last year.", wizardzz[^]

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Slacker007
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Even if our problems double in size with Pakistan, I don't think the United States wants to invade or bring our military to Pakistan like Afghanistan/Iraq...our relationship with India is very, very important to our government our business entities in my country. Pakistan got caught with their pants down around their ankles and now they are crying for mommy. To be expected.

                    -- You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a specialist.

                    I D 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • S Slacker007

                      Even if our problems double in size with Pakistan, I don't think the United States wants to invade or bring our military to Pakistan like Afghanistan/Iraq...our relationship with India is very, very important to our government our business entities in my country. Pakistan got caught with their pants down around their ankles and now they are crying for mommy. To be expected.

                      -- You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a specialist.

                      I Offline
                      I Offline
                      Ian Shlasko
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Actually, there's only one reason the US won't invade Pakistan. They have nukes.

                      Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                      Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                      D W 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • I Ian Shlasko

                        Actually, there's only one reason the US won't invade Pakistan. They have nukes.

                        Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                        Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        David1987
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        That's like negotiating with terrorists. If that's really a valid reason not to invade them (instead of a valid reason to invade them ASAP, which makes more sense) then the Axis of Evil has an excellent reason to make lots of nukes. I say nuke their nukes before they have even thought about using them.

                        I 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D David1987

                          That's like negotiating with terrorists. If that's really a valid reason not to invade them (instead of a valid reason to invade them ASAP, which makes more sense) then the Axis of Evil has an excellent reason to make lots of nukes. I say nuke their nukes before they have even thought about using them.

                          I Offline
                          I Offline
                          Ian Shlasko
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          David1987 wrote:

                          I say nuke their nukes before they have even thought about using them.

                          Man, I'm glad you're not running the country... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_strike[^] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction#Second_strike_capability[^]

                          Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                          Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                          D 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • I Ian Shlasko

                            David1987 wrote:

                            I say nuke their nukes before they have even thought about using them.

                            Man, I'm glad you're not running the country... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_strike[^] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistan_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction#Second_strike_capability[^]

                            Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                            Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                            D Offline
                            D Offline
                            David1987
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            You're still negotiating with terrorists. As soon as you allow that sort of thing to be an issue, you're giving the Axis of Evil a lot of power. (also I don't care whether the US survives but whatever)

                            I 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D David1987

                              You're still negotiating with terrorists. As soon as you allow that sort of thing to be an issue, you're giving the Axis of Evil a lot of power. (also I don't care whether the US survives but whatever)

                              I Offline
                              I Offline
                              Ian Shlasko
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              So you're one of those people who define "terrorists" as "everyone but us", right? Yeah, this conversation is pointless... Moving on.

                              Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                              Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                              D 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • I Ian Shlasko

                                So you're one of those people who define "terrorists" as "everyone but us", right? Yeah, this conversation is pointless... Moving on.

                                Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                                Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                                D Offline
                                D Offline
                                David1987
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                I don't think you got my point. If Second Strike capability is taken seriously, Iran et all will use that as a way to become "invulnerable". So you're better off taking some risks to send the message that having Second Strike capability gets you nothing. Pakistan obviously already did, so it's a tiny bit late. edit: And yes, I equate that with negotiating with terrorists, because it's the same idea. As soon as you start doing that, bad guys will use it to get what they want.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • S Slacker007

                                  Even if our problems double in size with Pakistan, I don't think the United States wants to invade or bring our military to Pakistan like Afghanistan/Iraq...our relationship with India is very, very important to our government our business entities in my country. Pakistan got caught with their pants down around their ankles and now they are crying for mommy. To be expected.

                                  -- You don't hire a handyman to build a house, you hire a specialist.

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  dan sh
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  I really wish you are right. Attack them and they make our life even more hellish.

                                  "The worst code you'll come across is code you wrote last year.", wizardzz[^]

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • I Ian Shlasko

                                    Actually, there's only one reason the US won't invade Pakistan. They have nukes.

                                    Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in?
                                    Author of the Guardians Saga (Sci-Fi/Fantasy novels)

                                    W Offline
                                    W Offline
                                    wizardzz
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    and a war with Pak is essentially a war with China.

                                    Craigslist Troll: litaly@comcast.net "I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson

                                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • W wizardzz

                                      and a war with Pak is essentially a war with China.

                                      Craigslist Troll: litaly@comcast.net "I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson

                                      T Offline
                                      T Offline
                                      Tarun K S
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      I don't think China will interfere. It didn't interfere when we fought with Pakistan in '65, '71 and '99. Though it might have provided ammunitions and other military stuff.

                                      The more anger towards the past you carry in your heart, the less capable you are of loving in the present. My Blog![^]

                                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • T Tarun K S

                                        I don't think China will interfere. It didn't interfere when we fought with Pakistan in '65, '71 and '99. Though it might have provided ammunitions and other military stuff.

                                        The more anger towards the past you carry in your heart, the less capable you are of loving in the present. My Blog![^]

                                        W Offline
                                        W Offline
                                        wizardzz
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        I have a feeling if it was nuclear, there would be a Chinese response. They are supplying munitions to anyone they can, but hypocritically, it's a big no-no for the U.S. to sell arms to Taiwan. Pak wants to join the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, but I don't know if both India and Pak would be allowed.

                                        Craigslist Troll: litaly@comcast.net "I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson

                                        T 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R Rajesh R Subramanian

                                          Slacker007 wrote:

                                          Whether or not our military went about this operation the right way, means absolutely nothing to me

                                          Actually, it means a lot. The US military tried to kill him several times in the past. Pakistan was purportedly an ally of the US for each such operation that was executed (that cost HUGE amounts of money), and the US shared military intelligence with Pakistan as they "needed" to know what, and how is going to happen too. This time around, it appeared that the US had a little doubt over Pakistan's "support" and they went on with the operation WITHOUT keeping the Pakistani government in loop. The result was obvious, and it gives rise to many questions. As an Indian who has lived for several years next to a country that harbours terrorists, I can tell you that you guys did the correct thing in distrusting Pakistan in this operation.

                                          "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

                                          U Offline
                                          U Offline
                                          Umair Feroze
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          Rajesh R Subramanian wrote:

                                          As an Indian who has lived for several years next to a country that harbours terrorists, I can tell you that you guys did the correct thing in distrusting Pakistan in this operation.

                                          Yup you are right. Pakistan is harbouring the terrorists. Out of top 10 most wanted person's list issued by USA, none is a Pakistani but there is an indian. But still Pakistan is responsible for that. Why is that so? If I include Osama Bin Laden in the top most wanted list, this will bring the count to 11, only 3 are muslims, but Islam is potrayed as terrorist religion. What are you to say about remaining 8?

                                          modified on Wednesday, May 11, 2011 10:21 AM

                                          R T 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups