Pirates of the Caribbean
-
Not as bad as I thought it was going to be, annd Ian McShane was actually quite good. However, am I alone in thinking 3d is a bit shite? Some shots were done just to show how clever the technical direction is, and didn't really advance the story. I find it distracting and needless. I would prefer a slightly better edited 2d version.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
Dalek Dave wrote:
However, am I alone in thinking 3d is a bit shite?
No, I completely agree! :thumbsup:
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932 -
Not as bad as I thought it was going to be, annd Ian McShane was actually quite good. However, am I alone in thinking 3d is a bit shite? Some shots were done just to show how clever the technical direction is, and didn't really advance the story. I find it distracting and needless. I would prefer a slightly better edited 2d version.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
The entire 3D experience is not what it should be (yet). I always compare it with looking at you're mirror image via an actual mirror or a window. 3D is like looking via the window. The concept is there, but it is not detailed enough to 'convince' you of the real thing. :~
V.
-
Not as bad as I thought it was going to be, annd Ian McShane was actually quite good. However, am I alone in thinking 3d is a bit shite? Some shots were done just to show how clever the technical direction is, and didn't really advance the story. I find it distracting and needless. I would prefer a slightly better edited 2d version.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
Dalek Dave wrote:
am I alone in thinking 3d is a bit shite?
No. Its excessive, over the top, annoying and silly.
Dr D Evans "The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s" financialpost
-
Not as bad as I thought it was going to be, annd Ian McShane was actually quite good. However, am I alone in thinking 3d is a bit shite? Some shots were done just to show how clever the technical direction is, and didn't really advance the story. I find it distracting and needless. I would prefer a slightly better edited 2d version.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
Went to watch this movie with the family yesterday. The movies sucks. Halfway through the movie we took a vote on how many of us wanted to leave immediately. Even the kids who liked POTC 1 ,2 and 3 supported the idea.
Und wenn du lange in einen abgrund blickst, blickt der Abgrund auch in dich hinein.
-
Watched a week ago(in 2D).
Dalek Dave wrote:
Not as bad as.....
Agree. But I(Well, everybody) like the 1st & 2nd parts very much & I'm sure any sequel can't beat those.
thatraja
**My Tip/Tricks
My Dad had a Heart Attack on this day so don't...
**I liked the first; the second felt like a "we'll turn this into a trilogy so this film is just filler"-film.
-
I liked the first; the second felt like a "we'll turn this into a trilogy so this film is just filler"-film.
Watched the first last night with my daughter. Second irritated me, cos of what you said, they stretched it out to the point of nothing so it could be the middle bit of a trilogy with the second half of that story saved for the next film. I actually thought the third was better, although that may just be because it finally got around to finishing the story from the third rather than it being any good.
Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends.
-
Not as bad as I thought it was going to be, annd Ian McShane was actually quite good. However, am I alone in thinking 3d is a bit shite? Some shots were done just to show how clever the technical direction is, and didn't really advance the story. I find it distracting and needless. I would prefer a slightly better edited 2d version.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
3D panders to those who think Terminator 2 is a better film than the original, those who like flashes and bangs and don't want to think at all. Those who need to be distracted at frequent intervals to sit through a whole film.
Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends.
-
Not as bad as I thought it was going to be, annd Ian McShane was actually quite good. However, am I alone in thinking 3d is a bit shite? Some shots were done just to show how clever the technical direction is, and didn't really advance the story. I find it distracting and needless. I would prefer a slightly better edited 2d version.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
There's 3D movies, and there's movies in 3D. Just as there are special effects movies and movies with special effects. I go to movies to see movies, not special effects or 3D. If either of I notice either of those that is a sign that it was done poorly.
-
Not as bad as I thought it was going to be, annd Ian McShane was actually quite good. However, am I alone in thinking 3d is a bit shite? Some shots were done just to show how clever the technical direction is, and didn't really advance the story. I find it distracting and needless. I would prefer a slightly better edited 2d version.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
-
Not as bad as I thought it was going to be, annd Ian McShane was actually quite good. However, am I alone in thinking 3d is a bit shite? Some shots were done just to show how clever the technical direction is, and didn't really advance the story. I find it distracting and needless. I would prefer a slightly better edited 2d version.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
Just wait until the Marketing people start touting (one-way) 4-D. The movie starts, and the next thing you know, you're two hours into the future :doh: If the movie is really bad and you ask for your 2 hours back, they can say "Sorry, one way trip only" :laugh:
Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am