Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Odd Google results, or just me?

Odd Google results, or just me?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
databasequestion
16 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N NormDroid

    Lets hope scientfic or financial business rely on Google for there mathematic prowess.

    Software Kinetics - The home of good software

    H Offline
    H Offline
    hairy_hats
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    Norm .net wrote:

    Lets hope scientfic or financial business rely on Google for there mathematic prowess.

    Are you using predictive text by any chance?

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H hairy_hats

      Norm .net wrote:

      Lets hope scientfic or financial business rely on Google for there mathematic prowess.

      Are you using predictive text by any chance?

      N Offline
      N Offline
      NormDroid
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      :) I'm swapping between coding and posting - dangerous I know :).

      Software Kinetics - The home of good software

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Mirko1980

        Actually, Google is right. sqrt(-1^2) = sqrt(-(1^2)) = sqrt(-1*1) = sqrt(-1) = i sqrt(-i^2) = sqrt(-(i^2)) = sqrt(-1*-1) = sqrt(1) = 1

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Chris Maunder
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        -1^2 != -(1^2) :rolleyes:

        cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Maunder

          -1^2 != -(1^2) :rolleyes:

          cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Mirko1980
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          This is what wikipedia says about Order of Operations: There exist differing conventions concerning the unary operator - (usually read "minus"). In written or printed mathematics, the expression -3² is interpreted to mean -(3²) = -9, but in some applications and programming languages, notably the application Microsoft Office Excel and the programming language bc, unary operators have a higher priority than binary operators, that is, the unary minus (negation) has higher precedence than exponentiation, so in those languages -3² will be interpreted as (-3)² = 9. [1] In any case where there is a possibility that the notation might be misinterpreted, it is advisable to use brackets to clarify which interpretation is intended.

          modified on Friday, June 3, 2011 8:56 AM

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Reelix

            The answers came from google calculator (That show below a simple mathematical search query) square root (-1^2) = i square root (-i^2) = 1 o_O

            -= Reelix =-

            G Offline
            G Offline
            GenJerDan
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            You're lucky they even allowed it to be presented. Maybe their legal department didn't see it yet. Though they could probably get away with it if they included a disclaimer, or changed it to a capital I.

            Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. My Mu[sic] My Films My Windows Programs, etc.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Mirko1980

              This is what wikipedia says about Order of Operations: There exist differing conventions concerning the unary operator - (usually read "minus"). In written or printed mathematics, the expression -3² is interpreted to mean -(3²) = -9, but in some applications and programming languages, notably the application Microsoft Office Excel and the programming language bc, unary operators have a higher priority than binary operators, that is, the unary minus (negation) has higher precedence than exponentiation, so in those languages -3² will be interpreted as (-3)² = 9. [1] In any case where there is a possibility that the notation might be misinterpreted, it is advisable to use brackets to clarify which interpretation is intended.

              modified on Friday, June 3, 2011 8:56 AM

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Chris Maunder
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              I will concede the point that parenthesis are needed.

              cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Reelix

                The answers came from google calculator (That show below a simple mathematical search query) square root (-1^2) = i square root (-i^2) = 1 o_O

                -= Reelix =-

                A Offline
                A Offline
                AspDotNetDev
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                i? What is that, some kind of imaginary number?

                [Managing Your JavaScript Library in ASP.NET]

                V 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A AspDotNetDev

                  i? What is that, some kind of imaginary number?

                  [Managing Your JavaScript Library in ASP.NET]

                  V Offline
                  V Offline
                  Vark111
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Let's not make this complex.

                  A 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • V Vark111

                    Let's not make this complex.

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    AspDotNetDev
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    Don't be square.

                    [Managing Your JavaScript Library in ASP.NET]

                    V 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A AspDotNetDev

                      Don't be square.

                      [Managing Your JavaScript Library in ASP.NET]

                      V Offline
                      V Offline
                      Vark111
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      This sort of thing is becoming integral to CP, isn't it?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups