Default member names (?)
-
Why do we see a number of users with names like "Member 7845347"? Is that some kind of default for users who don't supply a proper name when they sign up? If so then I suggest the default is changed to something like "Idiot troll xxxx". It would be more self-documenting and useful to the other members here.
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
-
Why do we see a number of users with names like "Member 7845347"? Is that some kind of default for users who don't supply a proper name when they sign up? If so then I suggest the default is changed to something like "Idiot troll xxxx". It would be more self-documenting and useful to the other members here.
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
Phil J Pearson wrote:
Member 7845347
It indicates either laziness, laxity, apathy or stupidity. None of these attributes are particularly complimentary.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
-
Phil J Pearson wrote:
Member 7845347
It indicates either laziness, laxity, apathy or stupidity. None of these attributes are particularly complimentary.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
Dalek Dave wrote:
None of these attributes are particularly complimentary.
But at least they don't betray a sad lack of grasp of English grammar. ;P For those who don't get it: "none" is singular and should therefore take a singular verb, as in "None ... is ... complimentary"
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
-
Why do we see a number of users with names like "Member 7845347"? Is that some kind of default for users who don't supply a proper name when they sign up? If so then I suggest the default is changed to something like "Idiot troll xxxx". It would be more self-documenting and useful to the other members here.
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
I have often pondered this and I agree with you on the default naming convention for people who don't give a proper screen name.
-- ** Jack of all trades and master of none.
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
None of these attributes are particularly complimentary.
But at least they don't betray a sad lack of grasp of English grammar. ;P For those who don't get it: "none" is singular and should therefore take a singular verb, as in "None ... is ... complimentary"
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
'Attributes' is plural. Had I said "None of the attributes mentioned is particularly complimentary." I would be correct, as I would be treating all attributes as a single group ("The Attributes"). However, by not treating them as such I am grammatically correct by the implication of their being discrete entities.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
-
Why do we see a number of users with names like "Member 7845347"? Is that some kind of default for users who don't supply a proper name when they sign up? If so then I suggest the default is changed to something like "Idiot troll xxxx". It would be more self-documenting and useful to the other members here.
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
Many times, the default name is better than what most people would choose if pressed.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997modified on Monday, June 13, 2011 7:33 AM
-
Why do we see a number of users with names like "Member 7845347"? Is that some kind of default for users who don't supply a proper name when they sign up? If so then I suggest the default is changed to something like "Idiot troll xxxx". It would be more self-documenting and useful to the other members here.
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
You can Suggest this here
-
'Attributes' is plural. Had I said "None of the attributes mentioned is particularly complimentary." I would be correct, as I would be treating all attributes as a single group ("The Attributes"). However, by not treating them as such I am grammatically correct by the implication of their being discrete entities.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
So which is the correct in this case? 0 - One of these attributes are... 1 - One of these attributes is... This is an honest question, by the way...
-
So which is the correct in this case? 0 - One of these attributes are... 1 - One of these attributes is... This is an honest question, by the way...
-
So why is it "None of these attributes are..." correct? Isn't "none" another form for "not one"? That would make the sentence "Not one of these attributes is..." correct, wouldn't it?
-
So why is it "None of these attributes are..." correct? Isn't "none" another form for "not one"? That would make the sentence "Not one of these attributes is..." correct, wouldn't it?
None can be applicable as a plural. If there is one option - "It is not the one I want". For two items - "Neither is the one I want" or "Neither are the ones I want". For many items - "None is the one I want" or "None are the ones I want". I was, originally, indicating the plurality of the attributes, for there were many attributes, where I was not implying one of a group, but many or all of the group, therefore ARE was correct in this case.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
-
None can be applicable as a plural. If there is one option - "It is not the one I want". For two items - "Neither is the one I want" or "Neither are the ones I want". For many items - "None is the one I want" or "None are the ones I want". I was, originally, indicating the plurality of the attributes, for there were many attributes, where I was not implying one of a group, but many or all of the group, therefore ARE was correct in this case.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
Thanks for the grammar lesson :thumbsup: :-D
-
None can be applicable as a plural. If there is one option - "It is not the one I want". For two items - "Neither is the one I want" or "Neither are the ones I want". For many items - "None is the one I want" or "None are the ones I want". I was, originally, indicating the plurality of the attributes, for there were many attributes, where I was not implying one of a group, but many or all of the group, therefore ARE was correct in this case.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
Not true. The subject for the verb is "none", not "attributes". As another poster said "none" is equivalent to "not one" so a singular verb is required.
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
-
Why do we see a number of users with names like "Member 7845347"? Is that some kind of default for users who don't supply a proper name when they sign up? If so then I suggest the default is changed to something like "Idiot troll xxxx". It would be more self-documenting and useful to the other members here.
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
Should change a script which will generate a username...which may encourage the new user to choose one for themself. Unless they want to be known as Fardsnibble. (But don't use a dictionary-based generator like AOL did for their temps. Few would want to be known as CowboyEnema, as AOL found out.)
Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. My Mu[sic] My Films My Windows Programs, etc.
-
Why do we see a number of users with names like "Member 7845347"? Is that some kind of default for users who don't supply a proper name when they sign up? If so then I suggest the default is changed to something like "Idiot troll xxxx". It would be more self-documenting and useful to the other members here.
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
Phil J Pearson wrote:
If so then I suggest the default is changed to something like "Idiot troll xxxx". It would be more...useful to the other members here.
How so? What is it that the latter would tel you that would not also be evident from the former?
"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
"Some people are making such thorough preparation for rainy days that they aren't enjoying today's sunshine." - William Feather
-
Not true. The subject for the verb is "none", not "attributes". As another poster said "none" is equivalent to "not one" so a singular verb is required.
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
-
No, "are" is correct. Just read it without the "attributes". 'None of these are particularly complimentary.' as opposed to 'None of these is particularly complimentary.' Which one sounds right?
Whichever you think "sounds" right the fact is that "is" is correct.
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
-
Whichever you think "sounds" right the fact is that "is" is correct.
Phil
The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of the author, especially if you find them impolite, inaccurate or inflammatory.
-
None can be applicable as a plural. If there is one option - "It is not the one I want". For two items - "Neither is the one I want" or "Neither are the ones I want". For many items - "None is the one I want" or "None are the ones I want". I was, originally, indicating the plurality of the attributes, for there were many attributes, where I was not implying one of a group, but many or all of the group, therefore ARE was correct in this case.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
Dalek Dave wrote:
For two items - "Neither is the one I want" or "Neither are the ones I want".
For many items - "None is the one I want" or "None are the ones I want".Yikes, talk about misrepresentation! The (mildly illogical but rule-by-usage) plurality only applies if there is plurality in the requirement, i.e: -- I want two particular items. -- There are five items here. -- None of the five items are the two items I want. But that doesn't apply to your original statement.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
