Contest - Google Whacking [modified]
-
"programming dysentary" (in quotes) returned 0 results. Definition - the act of writing crappy code, over and over again.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 -
The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'
modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM
"heuristic zest" 2 results (0.15 seconds) 2
The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar
-
The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'
modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM
"anthropomorphic polyandry" returned 0 results - don't ask me which sites I have been looking at :sigh:
Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential.(Winston Churchill)
-
The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'
modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM
-
But isn't 0 results even more whacked, especially if the search phrase contains fairly normal words? If not, give the google crawler time to catch up, and my search phrase will only return 1 result - right here on Codeproject. Buhzinga. :)
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 -
The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'
modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM
"Antidisestablishmentarianism zest" 1 result (0.07 seconds)
The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar
-
"Antidisestablishmentarianism zest" 1 result (0.07 seconds)
The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar
-
"Antidisestablishmentarianism zest" 1 result (0.07 seconds)
The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar
Until tomorrow. Then, there will be two.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 -
â±£ompey wrote:
You sir have just whacked Google
Delighted..... :)
The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar
-
The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'
modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM
"Maunder Pompey" 1 result (0.08 seconds) Like that?
It was broke, so I fixed it.
-
The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'
modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM
"antidisestablishmentarianism hates" 1 result (0.13 seconds)
The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar
-
"Maunder Pompey" 1 result (0.08 seconds) Like that?
It was broke, so I fixed it.
-
The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'
modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM
"antidisestablishmentarian man" 1 result (0.13 seconds)
The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar
-
"Antidisestablishmentarianism zest" 1 result (0.07 seconds)
The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar
Now you have to visit the site owners in person and get them to find two more... Dave Gorman's Googlewhack Adventure[^] [edit]Damn those "encode HTML tags" buttons...[/edit]
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
-
The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'
modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM
"hamster pogrom" got one in 0.07 sec
-
Now you have to visit the site owners in person and get them to find two more... Dave Gorman's Googlewhack Adventure[^] [edit]Damn those "encode HTML tags" buttons...[/edit]
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together. Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
I didn't get you. BTW I searched for longest word and accidentally added zest to it, and I got this.....
The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. ~Edward Phelps Man's wisest mistake: Marriage. ~ Suresh Suthar
-
The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'
modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM
"rubi dious" "imm ortal" Gives this[^] I have split the words with spaces so that this page does not add to the entries and it maintains it's singularity.
------------------------------------ I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] Trolls[^]
-
The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'
modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM
Try "beacon datagrid" (with quotes).
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier - my favourite utility
-
The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'
modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM
-
The idea is the complete opposite to JSOP's below. You must find two words that when entered into Google produce the fewest results, with the aim of finding two words that when entered into Google only produce 1 result. You have then whacked Google. Of course if you are successful and post it here, that will be two results. Rules: 0. Words must be in English Dictionary. 1. Only two words are permitted. More on GoogleWhacking[^]. 'A Googlewhack is a type of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words with quotation marks, that returns exactly one hit. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear in the result page.'
modified on Monday, August 1, 2011 8:35 AM
"Caledon Bacon" 1 result (0.12 seconds)
It was broke, so I fixed it.
