Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Why we call them bugs???

Why we call them bugs???

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helpquestion
53 Posts 34 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • W W Balboos GHB

    OK, how about "Operationally Impaired" ? ? ?

    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

    "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

    "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

    K Offline
    K Offline
    KP Lee
    wrote on last edited by
    #43

    W∴ Balboos wrote:

    OK, how about "Operationally Impaired" ? ? ?

    Wait a minute, I'm "Operationally Impaired" and I'm not an autobot trying to bring down codeproject nor an error in a computer program! :laugh:

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Reiss

      sujit0761 wrote:

      Ok.Lets suggest new names for BUGS

      I thought we had ages ago - they are either user error or undocumented feature ;)

      K Offline
      K Offline
      KP Lee
      wrote on last edited by
      #44

      Yea, I remember swearing at some of SQL 2000's "features", but they were documented "features"! I didn't have a leg to complain on. For some odd reason they decided to remove these particular features in SQL 2005. They removed the ability to open a stored procedure, see one of the parameters is a text field and know exactly why it was going into an infinite loop. Don't know why "substring" partially violated that feature and allowed for a workaround in SQL 2000 that fixed the infinite loop.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Peter Mulholland

        Didn't microsoft already try that? I don't think anyone fell for it then either. :-D

        Pete

        K Offline
        K Offline
        KP Lee
        wrote on last edited by
        #45

        I know for a fact that Microsoft documented some features in SQL 2000. For some reason they decided to remove those features in 2005 without even downgrading their status and asking us to discontinue doing that. (IE Asking us to stop breaking our code by expecting SQL to do something correctly.)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S sujit0761

          Any error made in an application is refferd to as bug.Why? Why not something else... Ok.Lets suggest new names for BUGS!!!!! ;P

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Charles Wolfe
          wrote on last edited by
          #46

          Engineers were using the term "bug" for a problem or error in the late 1800s, maybe earlier (check the Oxford English Dictionary and other reliable sources such as Dr. Johnson). So, for Grace to use the term would not be not unusual. Also, she showed those who asked, the dead bug in the machine that had caused the electrical, not logical, problem she was talking about. The term caught on with those who worked with programming "and the rest, as they say, is history".

          Charles Wolfe C. Wolfe Software Engineering

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K KP Lee

            PIEBALDconsult wrote:

            Nagy Vilmos wrote:

            as old as computers

            Older than that actually.

            Well, that depends on your definition of a computer and the scope of what you are talking about. Bugs probably predate dinosaurs. I say that is out of scope for this thread. (why mistakes in computers are called bugs.) Nagy had a link to "Grace Hopper". That also is basically how I remember the term coming into being. I accept her being the mother of the term coming into existence relating to bugs being in computer programs. If you think about it, the computer had to exist for Grace to be digging around in it to find the little bugger causing all the problems. Therefore the computer is older than the term as it relates to computer bugs. I'll concede that "fly in the ointment" would be older than that and that it relates to problems being encountered, but that too, is out of scope for the specific use of the term. I'll say that the term came about, nearly at the beginning of the start of what we now call a computer. However Charles Babbage got the credit for designing the first computer and he died well before Grace was born. (His machine wasn't built until fairly recently.) At least that (credit) was the case into the beginning of this century. Now if you search for the oldest computer, they've found a machine they are calling a computer that was built more than 2000 years ago. If you count that as a computer the term bugs in a computer is just a young whippersnapper.

            P Offline
            P Offline
            PIEBALDconsult
            wrote on last edited by
            #47

            KP Lee wrote:

            "Grace Hopper".

            Had the term not already been in use as relating to problems in machines, she would not have made the notation she did, she might not have notated it at all.

            K 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • P PIEBALDconsult

              KP Lee wrote:

              "Grace Hopper".

              Had the term not already been in use as relating to problems in machines, she would not have made the notation she did, she might not have notated it at all.

              K Offline
              K Offline
              KP Lee
              wrote on last edited by
              #48

              I agree that the terms "bugs and debugging" predate Grace relating to mechanical devices, and that probably tickled her funny bone enough to paste the moth in the log book. The fact remains that most credit Grace with making the terms popular when talking specifically about computers. I'm sure, the fact she pasted the moth in the log book probably stirred up a lot of "buzz" in the computer industry at the time (all ?10? :) people), and really did make it popular when specifically talking about computers.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P PIEBALDconsult

                KP Lee wrote:

                "Grace Hopper".

                Had the term not already been in use as relating to problems in machines, she would not have made the notation she did, she might not have notated it at all.

                K Offline
                K Offline
                KP Lee
                wrote on last edited by
                #49

                Besides that, what a great excuse! It's not me! Must be bugs in the computer.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O obermd

                  Actually, IMPs are Interface Message Processors, the precursors to today's routers. They were built by BBN as part of the original DARPANet project. Mike.

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  starmerak
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #50

                  Indeed, but "OpImp" is too long... Maybe that's the reason why "bug" sticks? Short and easy to say :-D

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • N Nagy Vilmos

                    I don't like the habit of giving every incident a number. Is it really fair to talk about bug #1783? What does that tell you about itself? Nothing. All bugs should be given descriptive names, like "Hell bitch exception when the user tries to repeatedly press enter quickly" That would be so much more fun in the long run. A whole new job could be created, a "Software Bug Taxonomist" who names and classifies bugs.


                    Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    James Lonero
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #51

                    Interesting, we can open up a whole new field of study. Computer "bug" entomology. There, we could also study viruses and worms. It'll be interesting when the bugs evolve wings and start flying. Just think, we will be there to watch the evolution! Exciting times there be.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D deutschspracher

                      Much older, think "fly in the ointment" older. :)

                      If debugging is the process of removing bugs, then programming must be the process of putting them in. ~Edsger Dijkstra

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      DragonsRightWing
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #52

                      deutschspracher wrote:

                      Much older, think "fly in the ointment" older. :)

                      Considering that a fly in the ointment makes the ointment stink, I'm certainly not going to apply it! ("Any error made in an application ...") :laugh:

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Reiss

                        sujit0761 wrote:

                        Ok.Lets suggest new names for BUGS

                        I thought we had ages ago - they are either user error or undocumented feature ;)

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        DragonsRightWing
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #53

                        Reiss wrote:

                        ... user error ...

                        "Removed and replaced the dip behind the stick - system operates as expected."

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups