Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Database & SysAdmin
  3. Database
  4. Need some opinions from experienced desktop application developers

Need some opinions from experienced desktop application developers

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Database
databasecsharpsql-serversysadminquestion
16 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Stan Moong

    I would like to hear some opinions from experienced developers who have worked with Access and SQL Server Express. I am thinking of building a desktop based room reservation system as a personal project. However, I am not sure what would be the best approach. I am thinking of the following options: 1) Using MS Access for both the front-end and back-end. 2) Using C# for front-end and MS Access as back-end. 3) Using C# for front-end and MS SQL Server Express as back-end. It would be a packaged software, so I'm wondering if MS Access would be stable enough. I haven't worked with MS Access long enough, so I would like to find out from other experienced developers whether MS Access backend would be sufficient, and what are some of the recommended steps to take to prevent database corruption - maybe backup, compact and repair every time program closes; what else? Thank you.

    D Offline
    D Offline
    David Skelly
    wrote on last edited by
    #4

    As always, it depends. Are you intending to put a lot of logic into the database (stored procedures)? Or are you intending to put as little logic into the database as possible, and just use it as a relatively dumb data store? I'm not suggesting either option is better than the other, but that decision might influence your choice of database. Or you could look at it the other way round - support for stored procs is better in some databases than in others so if you make the decision about the database first it may place limitations on how you design the application. You could also use this as an opportunity to think about how you might build a system which is database agnostic, or at least ask yourself the question, how easy would it be to upgrade from MS Access to SQL Server six months from now if I find Access can't cut it? It's not clear when you say this is a "personal" project whether that means it is just a learning exercise or whether you are considering possible commercial applications at some point (which is what I read into your statement about it being a "packaged" solution).

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Stan Moong

      I would like to hear some opinions from experienced developers who have worked with Access and SQL Server Express. I am thinking of building a desktop based room reservation system as a personal project. However, I am not sure what would be the best approach. I am thinking of the following options: 1) Using MS Access for both the front-end and back-end. 2) Using C# for front-end and MS Access as back-end. 3) Using C# for front-end and MS SQL Server Express as back-end. It would be a packaged software, so I'm wondering if MS Access would be stable enough. I haven't worked with MS Access long enough, so I would like to find out from other experienced developers whether MS Access backend would be sufficient, and what are some of the recommended steps to take to prevent database corruption - maybe backup, compact and repair every time program closes; what else? Thank you.

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chris C B
      wrote on last edited by
      #5

      If you are thinking of SQLite,which is an embedded DBS,you may also want to check out VistaDB[^] from Gibraltar software. I have been using for several years and have found it both reliable and very fast, with a small footprint. It has a reasonable management interface, can import from Access and SQLServer, and can export to XML.

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Stan Moong

        I would like to hear some opinions from experienced developers who have worked with Access and SQL Server Express. I am thinking of building a desktop based room reservation system as a personal project. However, I am not sure what would be the best approach. I am thinking of the following options: 1) Using MS Access for both the front-end and back-end. 2) Using C# for front-end and MS Access as back-end. 3) Using C# for front-end and MS SQL Server Express as back-end. It would be a packaged software, so I'm wondering if MS Access would be stable enough. I haven't worked with MS Access long enough, so I would like to find out from other experienced developers whether MS Access backend would be sufficient, and what are some of the recommended steps to take to prevent database corruption - maybe backup, compact and repair every time program closes; what else? Thank you.

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Corporal Agarn
        wrote on last edited by
        #6

        If the database will grow very big use something besides MS Access. Access is good for small stuff but personal preferance would be something else. Note I have used both Access and SQL Server as backends. I have used Access as the front end for a SQL Server backend. Stick with a different backend then Access if possible. Using C# as your front end will prevent a few security problems. Good luck and happy learning.

        S 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Stan Moong

          I would like to hear some opinions from experienced developers who have worked with Access and SQL Server Express. I am thinking of building a desktop based room reservation system as a personal project. However, I am not sure what would be the best approach. I am thinking of the following options: 1) Using MS Access for both the front-end and back-end. 2) Using C# for front-end and MS Access as back-end. 3) Using C# for front-end and MS SQL Server Express as back-end. It would be a packaged software, so I'm wondering if MS Access would be stable enough. I haven't worked with MS Access long enough, so I would like to find out from other experienced developers whether MS Access backend would be sufficient, and what are some of the recommended steps to take to prevent database corruption - maybe backup, compact and repair every time program closes; what else? Thank you.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          David Mujica
          wrote on last edited by
          #7

          I still use Access for small, single user applications, but I've found that using Access for Multi-User applications is not so hot. My 2 cents. :cool: Good luck. :thumbsup:

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D David Skelly

            As always, it depends. Are you intending to put a lot of logic into the database (stored procedures)? Or are you intending to put as little logic into the database as possible, and just use it as a relatively dumb data store? I'm not suggesting either option is better than the other, but that decision might influence your choice of database. Or you could look at it the other way round - support for stored procs is better in some databases than in others so if you make the decision about the database first it may place limitations on how you design the application. You could also use this as an opportunity to think about how you might build a system which is database agnostic, or at least ask yourself the question, how easy would it be to upgrade from MS Access to SQL Server six months from now if I find Access can't cut it? It's not clear when you say this is a "personal" project whether that means it is just a learning exercise or whether you are considering possible commercial applications at some point (which is what I read into your statement about it being a "packaged" solution).

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Stan Moong
            wrote on last edited by
            #8

            I am taking this chance to improve my development skill. At some point, I would like to sell it as a product. This is more of a side project, to be done after work or during the weekends. I am looking at light-weight database. The application would be a standalone, single-user. For support of multi-user, I intend to use configuration to specify the database connection. So, the database should be able to support multi-user environment, within a LAN -> which I am looking at a client/server architecture. This will be a data-entry, reporting application, so MS Access would be ideal. However, I do not have experience using the developer edition and compiled an executable with the Access run-time included in the package, which user can run without impacting the existing Access operation on their PC. Hence, looking at a C# front-end and a suitable light weight database as data store. Stored procedure would be nice to have.

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Chris C B

              If you are thinking of SQLite,which is an embedded DBS,you may also want to check out VistaDB[^] from Gibraltar software. I have been using for several years and have found it both reliable and very fast, with a small footprint. It has a reasonable management interface, can import from Access and SQLServer, and can export to XML.

              S Offline
              S Offline
              Stan Moong
              wrote on last edited by
              #9

              Thank you very much for the information. I will check it out!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Corporal Agarn

                If the database will grow very big use something besides MS Access. Access is good for small stuff but personal preferance would be something else. Note I have used both Access and SQL Server as backends. I have used Access as the front end for a SQL Server backend. Stick with a different backend then Access if possible. Using C# as your front end will prevent a few security problems. Good luck and happy learning.

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Stan Moong
                wrote on last edited by
                #10

                Thank you. Yup, I am looking at the C# as front-end, and a light-weight database for data store.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D David Mujica

                  I still use Access for small, single user applications, but I've found that using Access for Multi-User applications is not so hot. My 2 cents. :cool: Good luck. :thumbsup:

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Stan Moong
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #11

                  Thank you. I will be using C# as front-end, and a light-weight database for the data store.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Stan Moong

                    I am taking this chance to improve my development skill. At some point, I would like to sell it as a product. This is more of a side project, to be done after work or during the weekends. I am looking at light-weight database. The application would be a standalone, single-user. For support of multi-user, I intend to use configuration to specify the database connection. So, the database should be able to support multi-user environment, within a LAN -> which I am looking at a client/server architecture. This will be a data-entry, reporting application, so MS Access would be ideal. However, I do not have experience using the developer edition and compiled an executable with the Access run-time included in the package, which user can run without impacting the existing Access operation on their PC. Hence, looking at a C# front-end and a suitable light weight database as data store. Stored procedure would be nice to have.

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Bernhard Hiller
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #12

                    Stan Moong wrote:

                    reporting application

                    This can cause severe problems with MS Access. When you calculate sums, averages etc. on joins of sub queries, the performance will be unacceptably slow even with few data. In such cases, go for MS SQL Server (Express edition is OK too).

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Stan Moong

                      I would like to hear some opinions from experienced developers who have worked with Access and SQL Server Express. I am thinking of building a desktop based room reservation system as a personal project. However, I am not sure what would be the best approach. I am thinking of the following options: 1) Using MS Access for both the front-end and back-end. 2) Using C# for front-end and MS Access as back-end. 3) Using C# for front-end and MS SQL Server Express as back-end. It would be a packaged software, so I'm wondering if MS Access would be stable enough. I haven't worked with MS Access long enough, so I would like to find out from other experienced developers whether MS Access backend would be sufficient, and what are some of the recommended steps to take to prevent database corruption - maybe backup, compact and repair every time program closes; what else? Thank you.

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      GuyThiebaut
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #13

                      I would go for MySQL and C# as a final product. Why not prototype with Access - for single user apps the form design etc is easy and fast. Then when you are happy with what you are doing go for C# and MySQL - MySQL because it is open source and supported by Oracle. I would avoid Access as a backend database if you can as MySQL is built specifically for the sort of thing you are trying to do(and Access most definitely is not...).

                      Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential.(Winston Churchill)
                      S 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Stan Moong

                        I would like to hear some opinions from experienced developers who have worked with Access and SQL Server Express. I am thinking of building a desktop based room reservation system as a personal project. However, I am not sure what would be the best approach. I am thinking of the following options: 1) Using MS Access for both the front-end and back-end. 2) Using C# for front-end and MS Access as back-end. 3) Using C# for front-end and MS SQL Server Express as back-end. It would be a packaged software, so I'm wondering if MS Access would be stable enough. I haven't worked with MS Access long enough, so I would like to find out from other experienced developers whether MS Access backend would be sufficient, and what are some of the recommended steps to take to prevent database corruption - maybe backup, compact and repair every time program closes; what else? Thank you.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #14

                        Stan Moong wrote:

                        1. Using C# for front-end and MS SQL Server Express as back-end.

                        I would choose this anyday. Access database is bound to get corrupted with multi-user access.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G GuyThiebaut

                          I would go for MySQL and C# as a final product. Why not prototype with Access - for single user apps the form design etc is easy and fast. Then when you are happy with what you are doing go for C# and MySQL - MySQL because it is open source and supported by Oracle. I would avoid Access as a backend database if you can as MySQL is built specifically for the sort of thing you are trying to do(and Access most definitely is not...).

                          Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential.(Winston Churchill)
                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          Stan Moong
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #15

                          Yes, that is a good idea to get a prototype up, and also see if any design flaw. Thanks for the idea.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S Stan Moong

                            I would like to hear some opinions from experienced developers who have worked with Access and SQL Server Express. I am thinking of building a desktop based room reservation system as a personal project. However, I am not sure what would be the best approach. I am thinking of the following options: 1) Using MS Access for both the front-end and back-end. 2) Using C# for front-end and MS Access as back-end. 3) Using C# for front-end and MS SQL Server Express as back-end. It would be a packaged software, so I'm wondering if MS Access would be stable enough. I haven't worked with MS Access long enough, so I would like to find out from other experienced developers whether MS Access backend would be sufficient, and what are some of the recommended steps to take to prevent database corruption - maybe backup, compact and repair every time program closes; what else? Thank you.

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            Ganu Sharma
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #16

                            C Sharp and Ms access is best for your project. or choose your db according to length of db.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups