Global warming 'confirmed' by independent study
-
Fisticuffs wrote:
scary talented experts
Strawman, WristiSlaps. I shall continue to take an interest in the subject of climate science, and, although not a talented expert, I shall continue to express my opinion that what is needed is more research over the next 20 years, to determine whether adaptation or mitigation are the preferred options. (Should the evidence change, my opinion will, of course, change.) (Scary? Well, next door's cats are scared of me, but that's about it.)
Be dogmatic, not thoughtful. It's easier, and you get bumper stickers.- Anon.
-
I really don't understand why people go to university to study things anymore, Google is clearly enough.
- F
-
I really don't understand why people go to university to study things anymore, Google is clearly enough.
- F
Fisticuffs wrote:
I really don't understand why people go to university to study things anymore, Google is clearly enough.
Of course Google is enough! Doctors always think it's just the common cold, but Google knows better . . . ;P
-
My accountant is just about to tell me which antihypertensive I should put this guy on
- F
-
This guy who holds an advanced business degree says he's studied evolution extensively and the scientific data doesn't support it so i have to go argue with him for awhile because that's productive too
- F
-
It's a series of illustrative analogies and parables. In that sense I'm kind of like the Jesus. Did you ever hear the one about the marketing expert who did a bunch of research and is now convinced that aspartame causes cancer? They spoke to everyone they could about it, especially on the internet, but dismissed the opinions of people with any semblance of a medical or biochemical background as being "part of the conspiracy" or "just in it for the money."
- F
-
It's a series of illustrative analogies and parables. In that sense I'm kind of like the Jesus. Did you ever hear the one about the marketing expert who did a bunch of research and is now convinced that aspartame causes cancer? They spoke to everyone they could about it, especially on the internet, but dismissed the opinions of people with any semblance of a medical or biochemical background as being "part of the conspiracy" or "just in it for the money."
- F
-
It's a series of illustrative analogies and parables. In that sense I'm kind of like the Jesus. Did you ever hear the one about the marketing expert who did a bunch of research and is now convinced that aspartame causes cancer? They spoke to everyone they could about it, especially on the internet, but dismissed the opinions of people with any semblance of a medical or biochemical background as being "part of the conspiracy" or "just in it for the money."
- F
-
I really don't understand why people go to university to study things anymore, Google is clearly enough.
- F
-
My accountant is just about to tell me which antihypertensive I should put this guy on
- F
Fisticuffs wrote:
My accountant is just about to tell me which antihypertensive I should put this guy on
Well, "Them as counts, counts more than them as don't count", as me old pal Ridley used to say.
Be dogmatic, not thoughtful. It's easier, and you get bumper stickers.- Anon.
-
This guy who holds an advanced business degree says he's studied evolution extensively and the scientific data doesn't support it so i have to go argue with him for awhile because that's productive too
- F
-
It's a series of illustrative analogies and parables. In that sense I'm kind of like the Jesus. Did you ever hear the one about the marketing expert who did a bunch of research and is now convinced that aspartame causes cancer? They spoke to everyone they could about it, especially on the internet, but dismissed the opinions of people with any semblance of a medical or biochemical background as being "part of the conspiracy" or "just in it for the money."
- F
Fisticuffs wrote:
It's a series of illustrative analogies and parables.
And what would they be, then?
Fisticuffs wrote:
In that sense I'm kind of like the Jesus.
Another analogy! (I Googled.) Be God! The boy's full of 'em.
Fisticuffs wrote:
Did you ever hear the one about the marketing expert who did a bunch of research and is now convinced that aspartame causes cancer? They spoke to everyone they could about it, especially on the internet, but dismissed the opinions of people with any semblance of a medical or biochemical background as being "part of the conspiracy" or "just in it for the money."
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D Post it under JOTD in the Lounge, it's a cracker!
Be dogmatic, not thoughtful. It's easier, and you get bumper stickers.- Anon.
-
It's a series of illustrative analogies and parables. In that sense I'm kind of like the Jesus. Did you ever hear the one about the marketing expert who did a bunch of research and is now convinced that aspartame causes cancer? They spoke to everyone they could about it, especially on the internet, but dismissed the opinions of people with any semblance of a medical or biochemical background as being "part of the conspiracy" or "just in it for the money."
- F
"Did you ever hear the one about the marketing politicised expert who did a bunch of research and is now convinced that aspartame CO2 causes cancer Catastrophic Global Warming? They spoke to everyone they could about it, especially on the internet, but dismissed the opinions of people with any semblance of a medical or biochemical background a different point of virew as being "part of the conspiracy" or "just in it for the money." :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: OK, the planet has warmed in the last century. It also warmed the 150 years before that. But 'Global Warming/Climate Change/Global Climate Disruption' as a message is pure BS, and you know it. Here is the only evidence there is: +40% CO2 and +0.6`C No positive feedbacks = No problem. And thats regardless of whether that warming was caused by CO2 or not.
============================== Nothing to say.
-
Fisticuffs wrote:
It's a series of illustrative analogies and parables.
And what would they be, then?
Fisticuffs wrote:
In that sense I'm kind of like the Jesus.
Another analogy! (I Googled.) Be God! The boy's full of 'em.
Fisticuffs wrote:
Did you ever hear the one about the marketing expert who did a bunch of research and is now convinced that aspartame causes cancer? They spoke to everyone they could about it, especially on the internet, but dismissed the opinions of people with any semblance of a medical or biochemical background as being "part of the conspiracy" or "just in it for the money."
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D Post it under JOTD in the Lounge, it's a cracker!
Be dogmatic, not thoughtful. It's easier, and you get bumper stickers.- Anon.
-
"Did you ever hear the one about the marketing politicised expert who did a bunch of research and is now convinced that aspartame CO2 causes cancer Catastrophic Global Warming? They spoke to everyone they could about it, especially on the internet, but dismissed the opinions of people with any semblance of a medical or biochemical background a different point of virew as being "part of the conspiracy" or "just in it for the money." :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: OK, the planet has warmed in the last century. It also warmed the 150 years before that. But 'Global Warming/Climate Change/Global Climate Disruption' as a message is pure BS, and you know it. Here is the only evidence there is: +40% CO2 and +0.6`C No positive feedbacks = No problem. And thats regardless of whether that warming was caused by CO2 or not.
============================== Nothing to say.
-
So hurts when you can't argue the facts doesn't it?
============================== Nothing to say.