Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Silverlight - it gets worse

Silverlight - it gets worse

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
30 Posts 17 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Rajesh R Subramanian

    CDP1802 wrote:

    Only the old dinosaur, Win32, seems to survive everything.

    Way too awesome for an old fart like that, don't ya think? :cool:

    "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Microsoft's tendency to drop things as quickly as they invent them has made going back to Win32 and C++ very appealing. Both have become something like stepchildren after .Net, but this also isolated them from much foolishness.

    And from the clouds a mighty voice spoke:
    "Smile and be happy, for it could come worse!"

    And I smiled and was happy
    And it came worse.

    B realJSOPR 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Microsoft's tendency to drop things as quickly as they invent them has made going back to Win32 and C++ very appealing. Both have become something like stepchildren after .Net, but this also isolated them from much foolishness.

      And from the clouds a mighty voice spoke:
      "Smile and be happy, for it could come worse!"

      And I smiled and was happy
      And it came worse.

      B Offline
      B Offline
      bosedk
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      CDP1802 wrote:

      Both have become something like stepchildren after .Net,

      More like children of ex who's less attractive and earns less (?) than the current spouse.

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Microsoft's tendency to drop things as quickly as they invent them has made going back to Win32 and C++ very appealing. Both have become something like stepchildren after .Net, but this also isolated them from much foolishness.

        And from the clouds a mighty voice spoke:
        "Smile and be happy, for it could come worse!"

        And I smiled and was happy
        And it came worse.

        realJSOPR Offline
        realJSOPR Offline
        realJSOP
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        CDP1802 wrote:

        but this also isolated them from much foolishness.

        ...and much updating.

        ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
        -----
        You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
        -----
        "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L leppie

          Well thank goodness, I never tried that WPF and Silverlight stuff :)

          IronScheme
          ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

          N Offline
          N Offline
          NormDroid
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          You don't know what you're missing ;P

          Software Kinetics Wear a hard hat it's under construction
          Metro RSS

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • realJSOPR realJSOP

            CDP1802 wrote:

            but this also isolated them from much foolishness.

            ...and much updating.

            ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
            -----
            You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
            -----
            "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            Isn't it great? Pull out 15 year old code, compile it and it runs. No updating any frameworks. The platform SDK has remained, thank god, very much the same. And the second bonus is that the smart cargo cult programmers will not last very long there. They will give up wenn they encounter their first pointers.

            And from the clouds a mighty voice spoke:
            "Smile and be happy, for it could come worse!"

            And I smiled and was happy
            And it came worse.

            R B 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Isn't it great? Pull out 15 year old code, compile it and it runs. No updating any frameworks. The platform SDK has remained, thank god, very much the same. And the second bonus is that the smart cargo cult programmers will not last very long there. They will give up wenn they encounter their first pointers.

              And from the clouds a mighty voice spoke:
              "Smile and be happy, for it could come worse!"

              And I smiled and was happy
              And it came worse.

              R Offline
              R Offline
              RobCroll
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              And it compiles so quickly you have to do a clean and build to convince yourself that it did actually recompile.

              "You get that on the big jobs."

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R RobCroll

                And it compiles so quickly you have to do a clean and build to convince yourself that it did actually recompile.

                "You get that on the big jobs."

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                And you can say that for the code's performance as well. Very much less shoveling data from and to a database, converting it ten times along the way. The code itself had less fat and more muscles and C++ also helps a little by 'forgetting' the word 'managed'. Our intern has just 'proven' that C# runs just as fast as C++. By taking the time a for loop needs to count to 4 billions in both languages. Now he is puzzled why I laughed and told him that this is not much of a surprise.

                And from the clouds a mighty voice spoke:
                "Smile and be happy, for it could come worse!"

                And I smiled and was happy
                And it came worse.

                R 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  And you can say that for the code's performance as well. Very much less shoveling data from and to a database, converting it ten times along the way. The code itself had less fat and more muscles and C++ also helps a little by 'forgetting' the word 'managed'. Our intern has just 'proven' that C# runs just as fast as C++. By taking the time a for loop needs to count to 4 billions in both languages. Now he is puzzled why I laughed and told him that this is not much of a surprise.

                  And from the clouds a mighty voice spoke:
                  "Smile and be happy, for it could come worse!"

                  And I smiled and was happy
                  And it came worse.

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  RobCroll
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  When it comes to release time, I think I'd feel better with managed code. But yeah a bit more muscle and a bit less blot would be good thing (he says looking down at his own paunch)

                  "You get that on the big jobs."

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H Henry Minute

                    Pete O'Hanlon wrote:

                    The thing is, nobody outside of not even MS actually knows whether or not this is true

                    FTFY.

                    Henry Minute Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?" “I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.” I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus! When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    BillWoodruff
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    HM response += 5; I think you just put a spotlight on a central assumption that's too easy to make: that Microsoft is some monolithic centralized entity with some highly rationalized planning process. Before I went to work at Adobe, long ago, I had this idea in my head that it was the "shining city on the hill," the "Valhalla" of PostScript (which was my specialty); it was an Oz, that, if it had witches, all of their last names were: "The Good." After six months there, I realized I was much more in the equivalent of a group of feuding city-states (say something like relations between Florence, Genoa, and Venice in the early to late Renaissance), with brutal turf wars going on. That's not a complaint, by the way: Adobe was the greatest company I ever worked for, and John Warnock is the most brilliant person I've ever had the privilege of working directly for and with (in the creation of what became Acrobat ... against very strong internal resistance from some groups in the company). I'd bet there's a lot of internal conflict, debate, and maneuvering still going on at MS right now around the future of SilverLight and WPF (and WinForms ?) in the context of what we have been "sold for now" as: the "next reality up to bat:" WRT, Metro, Win8, etc. I admit my bias: to me the whole schizo-relationship of Win8 and Metro looks to me like a temporary breakwater to halt the overwhelming tide of Apple's ascendancy in the mobile/tablet space. And the giant thundering strides of the JavaScript + jQuery juggernaut. I don't think the 'fat lady's sung' ... yet ... in the Microsoft Opera. I don't even think all the 'instruments' are in tune ... yet. best, Bill

                    "I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my telephone." Bjarne Stroustrop circa 1990

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B bosedk

                      CDP1802 wrote:

                      Both have become something like stepchildren after .Net,

                      More like children of ex who's less attractive and earns less (?) than the current spouse.

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Rajesh R Subramanian
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      bosedk wrote:

                      less attractive and earns less (?)

                      Less attractive, yes. But earn less? I doubt that.

                      "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R RobCroll

                        When it comes to release time, I think I'd feel better with managed code. But yeah a bit more muscle and a bit less blot would be good thing (he says looking down at his own paunch)

                        "You get that on the big jobs."

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #23

                        'Feel' is just the right word. Lately I have been looking at MASM again and they claim that there is no notable difference between a C++ developer or one using MASM for Win32. Given that both know what they are doing. Both use the same libraries, call the same functions and perform the same tasks. The only real difference is that their code looks different. Yet everybody always 'knew' that assembly must be a huge waste of time. Now, if we had two versions of the .Net framework, one managed and the other one with the same functionality, but unmanaged. What great difference would it make? With some discipline and good practices you can get along with 'unmanaged' very well and the rest of the code would again be very similar. I really think that 'managed' or 'unmanaged', object oriented or not or the choice of language have little objective influence on productivity. Given a similar environment, framework and tools, it's just a question of preferences. In the end it's more about the developer feeling comfortable with it.

                        And from the clouds a mighty voice spoke:
                        "Smile and be happy, for it could come worse!"

                        And I smiled and was happy
                        And it came worse.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • realJSOPR realJSOP

                          According to this article,, SL5 may only work in IE. What a crock of sh*t if it's true. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/11/10/microsoft_killing_silverlight_rumours/[^]

                          ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                          -----
                          You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                          -----
                          "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

                          B Offline
                          B Offline
                          BobJanova
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #24

                          I doubt MS would shoot themselves in the foot like that. Pulling it entirely would make more sense than putting the effort into releasing it only to alienate developers.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            Isn't it great? Pull out 15 year old code, compile it and it runs. No updating any frameworks. The platform SDK has remained, thank god, very much the same. And the second bonus is that the smart cargo cult programmers will not last very long there. They will give up wenn they encounter their first pointers.

                            And from the clouds a mighty voice spoke:
                            "Smile and be happy, for it could come worse!"

                            And I smiled and was happy
                            And it came worse.

                            B Offline
                            B Offline
                            BobJanova
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #25

                            It isn't quite 15 years yet, but pull out 9 year old .Net code[^] and it will compile and run – and I expect it to do so in another 6 years with no problem, too. The 9 year old EXE you made will still run, too.

                            L 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B BobJanova

                              It isn't quite 15 years yet, but pull out 9 year old .Net code[^] and it will compile and run – and I expect it to do so in another 6 years with no problem, too. The 9 year old EXE you made will still run, too.

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #26

                              Yes, if you still have the good old VS 2002 and framework 1.0 installed. I have not looked at my old stuff lately. What do the newer Visual Studios say to a .Net 1.0 solution? If I remember right, you will at least have to port it to 2.0.

                              And from the clouds a mighty voice spoke:
                              "Smile and be happy, for it could come worse!"

                              And I smiled and was happy
                              And it came worse.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • realJSOPR realJSOP

                                According to this article,, SL5 may only work in IE. What a crock of sh*t if it's true. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/11/10/microsoft_killing_silverlight_rumours/[^]

                                ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                -----
                                You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                -----
                                "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                JimmyRopes
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #27

                                " SL5 may only work in IE**"** News Flash!!!! Silverlight is a Micro$oft product. :doh:

                                The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                                Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                                Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                                I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                                realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P pseudonym67

                                  I can't speak for silverlight because I've never had any interest in web programming. ( Yes I know I'm becomming like my old university lecturer quite happy to stick with the stuff I know. We used to laugh at him for using still using dos based programs when we had all moved on to win 3.11 ) But Wpf which I'm just learning at the moment is more of a gui programming extension that can also be used on the web, but probably not if you want to leverage the full capabilities. From the windows programming point of view it's more the next generation of forms etc. Though apparently you can't do transitions when using a wpf control in a windows forms app. I haven;t tried it yet but this is the only thing I'm not happy about. But then it's easily fixed with tabs or splitters, it's just that transitions would be cooler.

                                  pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Personal Music Player[^]

                                  A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  AspDotNetDev
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #28

                                  pseudonym67 wrote:

                                  apparently you can't do transitions when using a wpf control in a windows forms app

                                  Perhaps you mean transparency. I haven't heard of any limitations on transitions (aka, animations) when combining the two.

                                  Somebody in an online forum wrote:

                                  INTJs never really joke. They make a point. The joke is just a gift wrapper.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J JimmyRopes

                                    " SL5 may only work in IE**"** News Flash!!!! Silverlight is a Micro$oft product. :doh:

                                    The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                                    Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                                    Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                                    I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                                    realJSOPR Offline
                                    realJSOPR Offline
                                    realJSOP
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #29

                                    News Flash - it works right now n Chrome, FF, and Opera. If they make it so it ONLY works on IE, that would suck because I don't want to use IE.

                                    ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                    -----
                                    You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                    -----
                                    "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

                                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • realJSOPR realJSOP

                                      News Flash - it works right now n Chrome, FF, and Opera. If they make it so it ONLY works on IE, that would suck because I don't want to use IE.

                                      ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                      -----
                                      You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                      -----
                                      "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

                                      J Offline
                                      J Offline
                                      JimmyRopes
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #30

                                      " If they make it so it ONLY works on IE, that would suck because I don't want to use IE." We have at least one thing in common, I don't want to use IE or Silverlight. Browser plug-in is so 20th Century.

                                      The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
                                      Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
                                      Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
                                      I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups