Standard way to write screen resolution

[Jacquers]

Width x Height is the way I'm used to it as well. One of my pet peeves is the default xaml generated in wpf, where they have swapped around e.g. Height="300" Width="300".

[CodingLover]

My concern is that order may confused, if different people use it in different way. Actually I am in a situation like that. One of my client use Height X Width and I practice so far it in other way round. I want to convince him about that general practice that lots of people are using.

I appreciate your help all the time... CodingLover :)

[leppie]

Tell him to look at the Screen resolution screen in Windows. Like this: http://imgur.com/pZkLX[^] Problem solved.

IronScheme
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

[peterchen]

Bill Gates himself wrote:

1900 x 1200 (Recommended)

It even says it's the recommended way of writing!

FILETIME to time_t
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | WhoIncludes - Analyzing C++ include file hierarchy

[Rod Kemp]

Tell your client to look at any site for manufacturers of Monitors/TVs/Projectors etc. they all specify screen resolutions in width x height.

People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs

[hairy_hats]

I think that's the least of WPF's problems...

[Jacquers]

For the most part I like wpf, it allows me to do some really nice ui stuff. But now and then it's utterly stupid, like trying to get the text in a textbox to be selected programatically. Because of wpf's focus system I have to use a long workaround to get it to work.

[hairy_hats]

It's a layer of abstraction too far for me, I stuck with WinForms.

[PIEBALDconsult]

Don't put Descartes[^] before the horse.

[CodingLover]

I agreed!

I appreciate your help all the time... CodingLover :)