Hats off to .less

[Lost User]

Hmm - the Knights of the HTML table?

I'm invincible, I can't be vinced

[Fabio V Silva]

I don't know much about web development but, is it really a good idea to depend on JavaScript to create the page's CSS? If you go to their homepage with JavaScript disabled all you see is plain text...

[Lost User]

They would probably prefer royalties...

============================== Nothing to say.

[Lost User]

CDP1802 wrote:

Knights of the HTML table

What would be their names? Clearly they would gather in a marquee...

============================== Nothing to say.

[Lost User]

At least the content is still there, there are plenty of sites that are almost completely empty without JS. I'm not saying it's a good idea (it sucks), just, it could be a lot worse.

[Nish Nishant]

Is it an alternative for jquery? [edit] Never mind, this is css-specific. [/edit]

Regards, Nish

---

My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

[Chris Maunder]

.less is more about the syntax than the processor. We have it running in VS automatically on each file save in VS using Chirpy[^].

cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

[Chris Maunder]

The'd certainly be living in cells.

cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

[leppie]

You can have a server-side 'expander' to emit CSS from LESS.

IronScheme
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

[Fabio V Silva]

Oh, I see. That makes more sense. I didn't notice the .less version either, your link was for the original less library.

[hairy_hats]

It would keep their ears warm in bed.

[Lost User]

And we would probably have to add HTML tags to the traditional heraldic symbols and perhaps redefine some of the heraldic colors.

I'm invincible, I can't be vinced