Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. NASA and a cheap solution.

NASA and a cheap solution.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comhelp
12 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    smcnulty2000
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    A cheap solution to a serious problem. http://gizmodo.com/5880850/how-nasa-solved-a-100-million-problem-for-five-bucks[^]

    _____________________________ Give a man a mug, he drinks for a day. Teach a man to mug... The difference between an ostrich and the average voter is where they stick their heads.

    R M C V 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • S smcnulty2000

      A cheap solution to a serious problem. http://gizmodo.com/5880850/how-nasa-solved-a-100-million-problem-for-five-bucks[^]

      _____________________________ Give a man a mug, he drinks for a day. Teach a man to mug... The difference between an ostrich and the average voter is where they stick their heads.

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Rage
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Same vein: USA made a lot of researches to develop an ejection seat for choppers, trying to sync the ejection with the rotor ( so that the pilot does not get sliced), or to stop the rotor in a position that would allow the seat to pass without hitting the blades. The russians solved the problem on the Ka50 : they ejected the rotor, and then the seat.

      L W 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • S smcnulty2000

        A cheap solution to a serious problem. http://gizmodo.com/5880850/how-nasa-solved-a-100-million-problem-for-five-bucks[^]

        _____________________________ Give a man a mug, he drinks for a day. Teach a man to mug... The difference between an ostrich and the average voter is where they stick their heads.

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Marc Clifton
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        They bought a handful of circuits that only cost a few bucks, hooked them up to the screen, and set it to strobe at 12Hz. And it worked! And for a totally free solution, the astronauts could have simply been taught to blink rapidly. ;P Marc

        My Blog
        An Agile walk on the wild side with Relationship Oriented Programming
        Melody's Amazon Herb Site

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Rage

          Same vein: USA made a lot of researches to develop an ejection seat for choppers, trying to sync the ejection with the rotor ( so that the pilot does not get sliced), or to stop the rotor in a position that would allow the seat to pass without hitting the blades. The russians solved the problem on the Ka50 : they ejected the rotor, and then the seat.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          lewax00
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I've heard a similar story about how the Americans spent millions of dollars to develop a pen that could write in zero gravity, while the Russians just used pencils. Not sure of accuracy though.

          A K 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • L lewax00

            I've heard a similar story about how the Americans spent millions of dollars to develop a pen that could write in zero gravity, while the Russians just used pencils. Not sure of accuracy though.

            A Offline
            A Offline
            AspDotNetDev
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            lewax00 wrote:

            Not sure of accuracy though

            Pencils are very accurate. If you make a mistake, you can just erase it and fix it.

            Thou mewling ill-breeding pignut!

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A AspDotNetDev

              lewax00 wrote:

              Not sure of accuracy though

              Pencils are very accurate. If you make a mistake, you can just erase it and fix it.

              Thou mewling ill-breeding pignut!

              L Offline
              L Offline
              lewax00
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              But that leads to sloppiness as there's no real penalty for mistakes. I should know, I can't write in pen because I make too many mistakes having been spoiled with pencils my whole life.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Rage

                Same vein: USA made a lot of researches to develop an ejection seat for choppers, trying to sync the ejection with the rotor ( so that the pilot does not get sliced), or to stop the rotor in a position that would allow the seat to pass without hitting the blades. The russians solved the problem on the Ka50 : they ejected the rotor, and then the seat.

                W Offline
                W Offline
                wizardzz
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                In Soviet Russia, you eject chopper!

                "I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S smcnulty2000

                  A cheap solution to a serious problem. http://gizmodo.com/5880850/how-nasa-solved-a-100-million-problem-for-five-bucks[^]

                  _____________________________ Give a man a mug, he drinks for a day. Teach a man to mug... The difference between an ostrich and the average voter is where they stick their heads.

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Chris Quinn
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  If you read Richard Feynman's account of the Challenger disaster investigation you will get a different picture. When the solid booster rockets were recovered from the sea, the sections would be stripped down for refurbishment and refuelling - it would come apart at the notorious field joints. When being re-assembled, the sections were often out of true and would need to be pulled back into a perfectly circular shape to allow them to fit properly into the each other. This was done by passing a threaded rod through opposite holes. then tightening nuts on each end to pull the edges in. Problem was, there were so many holes around the circumference that it was difficult to pick holes that were direct opposites - often they would be one or two holes off either way, which could cause the holes to be damaged. One engineer came up with a very simple idea - put a patch of black paint at 0, 90, 180 an 270 degrees around the circumference. You could then count the number of holes between the selected hole and the nearest paint patch, then count the same number on the opposite side. The engineers were told it would be too expensive to introduce this - nothing to do with the cost of the paint, but due to the cost of changing all of the documentation!

                  ==================================== Transvestites - Roberts in Disguise! ====================================

                  W 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L lewax00

                    I've heard a similar story about how the Americans spent millions of dollars to develop a pen that could write in zero gravity, while the Russians just used pencils. Not sure of accuracy though.

                    K Offline
                    K Offline
                    Kyudos
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Its false.[^]

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • K Kyudos

                      Its false.[^]

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      lewax00
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      :thumbsup: I always thought it sounded exaggerated, but never bothered to look it up, thanks. And I learned why astronauts would even want pens in the first place.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Chris Quinn

                        If you read Richard Feynman's account of the Challenger disaster investigation you will get a different picture. When the solid booster rockets were recovered from the sea, the sections would be stripped down for refurbishment and refuelling - it would come apart at the notorious field joints. When being re-assembled, the sections were often out of true and would need to be pulled back into a perfectly circular shape to allow them to fit properly into the each other. This was done by passing a threaded rod through opposite holes. then tightening nuts on each end to pull the edges in. Problem was, there were so many holes around the circumference that it was difficult to pick holes that were direct opposites - often they would be one or two holes off either way, which could cause the holes to be damaged. One engineer came up with a very simple idea - put a patch of black paint at 0, 90, 180 an 270 degrees around the circumference. You could then count the number of holes between the selected hole and the nearest paint patch, then count the same number on the opposite side. The engineers were told it would be too expensive to introduce this - nothing to do with the cost of the paint, but due to the cost of changing all of the documentation!

                        ==================================== Transvestites - Roberts in Disguise! ====================================

                        W Offline
                        W Offline
                        wizardzz
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Chris Quinn wrote:

                        but due to the cost boredom of changing all of the documentation!

                        "Hey, where's that intern? We got a task for him."

                        "I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. " — Hunter S. Thompson

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S smcnulty2000

                          A cheap solution to a serious problem. http://gizmodo.com/5880850/how-nasa-solved-a-100-million-problem-for-five-bucks[^]

                          _____________________________ Give a man a mug, he drinks for a day. Teach a man to mug... The difference between an ostrich and the average voter is where they stick their heads.

                          V Offline
                          V Offline
                          Vivi Chellappa
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Let me guess. Some contractor lowballed the bid?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups