Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. Site Bugs / Suggestions
  4. Article get screwed up by some "code project" editor - what to do?

Article get screwed up by some "code project" editor - what to do?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Site Bugs / Suggestions
csharplinqcomlinuxtools
9 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Andreas Gieriet
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hello everybody, I don't know if this is the right place to post this "complaint". I've added some tip/trick on code project and got the content silently "screwed" up by some high ranked editors of the code project. Screwed up means: highlighting got silently removed. If some code is highlighted, this has a meaning - maybe the text refers to it. The editor is in my eyes not supposed to change any content - highlighting is content relevant! If I choose to have black background and white text color, than this was done on purpose to give the impression of a shell output...! (You see - I'm quite upset - I thy to hold back...) I'm tempted to revert the messed up version. But in the long run, I'd like no one to *silently* change the tip/trick. I mean, I'm ok with suggestions to change or to fix some pure formatting or obvious typos. But everything other than that is a *no-go* for me. How to proceed? I'll revert/restore the old state, but how to avoid the tip scewed up again? If you need details I can provide them, but I'd like to know how I/you could prevent this in the future? Here one article that got screwed up:

    • Version 4 still ok
    • Version 5 screwed up

    Unfortuantely, this is not the only tip that got modified in a for me non-acceptable way. Thanks Andi

    L C S 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • A Andreas Gieriet

      Hello everybody, I don't know if this is the right place to post this "complaint". I've added some tip/trick on code project and got the content silently "screwed" up by some high ranked editors of the code project. Screwed up means: highlighting got silently removed. If some code is highlighted, this has a meaning - maybe the text refers to it. The editor is in my eyes not supposed to change any content - highlighting is content relevant! If I choose to have black background and white text color, than this was done on purpose to give the impression of a shell output...! (You see - I'm quite upset - I thy to hold back...) I'm tempted to revert the messed up version. But in the long run, I'd like no one to *silently* change the tip/trick. I mean, I'm ok with suggestions to change or to fix some pure formatting or obvious typos. But everything other than that is a *no-go* for me. How to proceed? I'll revert/restore the old state, but how to avoid the tip scewed up again? If you need details I can provide them, but I'd like to know how I/you could prevent this in the future? Here one article that got screwed up:

      • Version 4 still ok
      • Version 5 screwed up

      Unfortuantely, this is not the only tip that got modified in a for me non-acceptable way. Thanks Andi

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      If you click on the Revisions tab at the top of the article you can see who was the last person to edit it.

      Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        If you click on the Revisions tab at the top of the article you can see who was the last person to edit it.

        Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman

        A Offline
        A Offline
        Andreas Gieriet
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Hello Richard, I saw that but how to contact her? I can not drop a comment on her member page. Cheers Andi

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Andreas Gieriet

          Hello Richard, I saw that but how to contact her? I can not drop a comment on her member page. Cheers Andi

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          You could try finding one of her messages (click on the messages link on her home page) and reply to it. Alternatively if you post the question in the "Article Writing" forum it will get seen by the editor team.

          Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman

          A C 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • A Andreas Gieriet

            Hello everybody, I don't know if this is the right place to post this "complaint". I've added some tip/trick on code project and got the content silently "screwed" up by some high ranked editors of the code project. Screwed up means: highlighting got silently removed. If some code is highlighted, this has a meaning - maybe the text refers to it. The editor is in my eyes not supposed to change any content - highlighting is content relevant! If I choose to have black background and white text color, than this was done on purpose to give the impression of a shell output...! (You see - I'm quite upset - I thy to hold back...) I'm tempted to revert the messed up version. But in the long run, I'd like no one to *silently* change the tip/trick. I mean, I'm ok with suggestions to change or to fix some pure formatting or obvious typos. But everything other than that is a *no-go* for me. How to proceed? I'll revert/restore the old state, but how to avoid the tip scewed up again? If you need details I can provide them, but I'd like to know how I/you could prevent this in the future? Here one article that got screwed up:

            • Version 4 still ok
            • Version 5 screwed up

            Unfortuantely, this is not the only tip that got modified in a for me non-acceptable way. Thanks Andi

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Chris Maunder
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Hi Andi, I apologise for this happening. I will talk to Smitha and see what the issue was. I'm sure the changes were inadvertent, bit I'll ask her to ensure changes like this do not happen again. In the meantime do you want me to revert your tip?

            cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

            A 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              You could try finding one of her messages (click on the messages link on her home page) and reply to it. Alternatively if you post the question in the "Article Writing" forum it will get seen by the editor team.

              Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman

              A Offline
              A Offline
              Andreas Gieriet
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Hello Richard, Thanks for the feedback. I've posted a question on the Article Writing" forum: Code formatting removed by editor. Cheers Andi

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                You could try finding one of her messages (click on the messages link on her home page) and reply to it. Alternatively if you post the question in the "Article Writing" forum it will get seen by the editor team.

                Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Chris Maunder
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Sean and myself watch this forum like a hawk, so either forum will get our attention. :)

                cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Chris Maunder

                  Hi Andi, I apologise for this happening. I will talk to Smitha and see what the issue was. I'm sure the changes were inadvertent, bit I'll ask her to ensure changes like this do not happen again. In the meantime do you want me to revert your tip?

                  cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  Andreas Gieriet
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Hello Chris, thanks for your feedback. Yes, please revert to revision 4 (see revision list). Thank you for your quick help. And: this is not meant to blame Smitha! I appreciate very much that people take the time to edit all the articles and tips that are posted - a big thank you to everyone! Cheers Andi PS: In that tip, you might have a look at your new countstart="93" attribute in use! :)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Andreas Gieriet

                    Hello everybody, I don't know if this is the right place to post this "complaint". I've added some tip/trick on code project and got the content silently "screwed" up by some high ranked editors of the code project. Screwed up means: highlighting got silently removed. If some code is highlighted, this has a meaning - maybe the text refers to it. The editor is in my eyes not supposed to change any content - highlighting is content relevant! If I choose to have black background and white text color, than this was done on purpose to give the impression of a shell output...! (You see - I'm quite upset - I thy to hold back...) I'm tempted to revert the messed up version. But in the long run, I'd like no one to *silently* change the tip/trick. I mean, I'm ok with suggestions to change or to fix some pure formatting or obvious typos. But everything other than that is a *no-go* for me. How to proceed? I'll revert/restore the old state, but how to avoid the tip scewed up again? If you need details I can provide them, but I'd like to know how I/you could prevent this in the future? Here one article that got screwed up:

                    • Version 4 still ok
                    • Version 5 screwed up

                    Unfortuantely, this is not the only tip that got modified in a for me non-acceptable way. Thanks Andi

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Smitha Nishant
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Hello Andreas While removing some superfluous SPAN tags from the HTML, I seem to have inadvertently removed the SPAN class=highlight tags as well by mistake. I will fix this right away. Truly sorry about this. Smitha

                    Are you an aspiring author? Read how to submit articles to CodeProject: Article Submission Guidelines[^] More questions? Ask an editor here...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups