Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. Army Admits Re-Education Camp Manual “Not Intended For Public Release”

Army Admits Re-Education Camp Manual “Not Intended For Public Release”

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
comsecurityannouncementlearning
17 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Fort Leonard Wood Public Affairs director Tiffany Wood has provided the first official response to the shocking U.S. Army document that outlines the implementation of re-education camps, admitting that the manual was “not intended for public release” and claiming that its provisions only apply outside the United States, a contention completely disproved by the language contained in the document itself. Link[^] So I guess all of you trendies still don't believe its real. I suppose you haven't heard or read about the National Defense Authorization Act either.

    L K T G J 7 Replies Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Fort Leonard Wood Public Affairs director Tiffany Wood has provided the first official response to the shocking U.S. Army document that outlines the implementation of re-education camps, admitting that the manual was “not intended for public release” and claiming that its provisions only apply outside the United States, a contention completely disproved by the language contained in the document itself. Link[^] So I guess all of you trendies still don't believe its real. I suppose you haven't heard or read about the National Defense Authorization Act either.

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Johnathon Doenburg wrote:

      all of you trendies

      My cat wears Gucci!

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Johnathon Doenburg wrote:

        all of you trendies

        My cat wears Gucci!

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        _Josh_ wrote:

        My cat wears Gucci!

        Rocawear might be more trendy.

        L 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          _Josh_ wrote:

          My cat wears Gucci!

          Rocawear might be more trendy.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Johnathon Doenburg wrote:

          Rocawear might be more trendy.

          Never heard of it

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            _Josh_ wrote:

            My cat wears Gucci!

            Rocawear might be more trendy.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Cats - they invented those camps after they landed in flying saucers more than 4500 years ago. Their first victims were the Egyptians, who were brainwashed into worshipping them as gods (a typo almost made me write 'dogs' :)) You probably know that they still behave that way and now they have decided that it's time for another treatment. Don't worry and bring a little more fresh Tuna when you happen to be near the refrigerator :)

            At least artificial intelligence already is superior to natural stupidity

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Fort Leonard Wood Public Affairs director Tiffany Wood has provided the first official response to the shocking U.S. Army document that outlines the implementation of re-education camps, admitting that the manual was “not intended for public release” and claiming that its provisions only apply outside the United States, a contention completely disproved by the language contained in the document itself. Link[^] So I guess all of you trendies still don't believe its real. I suppose you haven't heard or read about the National Defense Authorization Act either.

              K Offline
              K Offline
              killabyte
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              doesnt that imply that they where educated to start with? clearly a massive oversite by the military there

              W 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Fort Leonard Wood Public Affairs director Tiffany Wood has provided the first official response to the shocking U.S. Army document that outlines the implementation of re-education camps, admitting that the manual was “not intended for public release” and claiming that its provisions only apply outside the United States, a contention completely disproved by the language contained in the document itself. Link[^] So I guess all of you trendies still don't believe its real. I suppose you haven't heard or read about the National Defense Authorization Act either.

                T Offline
                T Offline
                TPFKAPB
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                You Americans Fucking crack me up! :laugh:

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Fort Leonard Wood Public Affairs director Tiffany Wood has provided the first official response to the shocking U.S. Army document that outlines the implementation of re-education camps, admitting that the manual was “not intended for public release” and claiming that its provisions only apply outside the United States, a contention completely disproved by the language contained in the document itself. Link[^] So I guess all of you trendies still don't believe its real. I suppose you haven't heard or read about the National Defense Authorization Act either.

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Sure it could be real, but[^]

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Fort Leonard Wood Public Affairs director Tiffany Wood has provided the first official response to the shocking U.S. Army document that outlines the implementation of re-education camps, admitting that the manual was “not intended for public release” and claiming that its provisions only apply outside the United States, a contention completely disproved by the language contained in the document itself. Link[^] So I guess all of you trendies still don't believe its real. I suppose you haven't heard or read about the National Defense Authorization Act either.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    "This manual addresses Internment and Resettlement operations across the spectrum of conflict, specifically the doctrinal paradigm shift from traditional Enemy Prisoner of War operations to the broader and more inclusive requirements of detainee operations." Paradigm shift? Paradigm shift?! Oh, my dear, that is sooo nineties - I just hate the document already! I shall follow your example, sweetie, and not read one, single page of it!

                    All that is necessary for Evil to succeed is for Good Folks to keep voting for their Party. - Cornelius Thirp

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Fort Leonard Wood Public Affairs director Tiffany Wood has provided the first official response to the shocking U.S. Army document that outlines the implementation of re-education camps, admitting that the manual was “not intended for public release” and claiming that its provisions only apply outside the United States, a contention completely disproved by the language contained in the document itself. Link[^] So I guess all of you trendies still don't believe its real. I suppose you haven't heard or read about the National Defense Authorization Act either.

                      G Offline
                      G Offline
                      GuyThiebaut
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Calll me cynical but to me

                      infowars.com == Alex Jones == Loonie

                      “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

                      ― Christopher Hitchens

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K killabyte

                        doesnt that imply that they where educated to start with? clearly a massive oversite by the military there

                        W Offline
                        W Offline
                        wizardzz
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Leslie? http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4245609/Re-Reeducation-camps-in-America.aspx[^]

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Fort Leonard Wood Public Affairs director Tiffany Wood has provided the first official response to the shocking U.S. Army document that outlines the implementation of re-education camps, admitting that the manual was “not intended for public release” and claiming that its provisions only apply outside the United States, a contention completely disproved by the language contained in the document itself. Link[^] So I guess all of you trendies still don't believe its real. I suppose you haven't heard or read about the National Defense Authorization Act either.

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jschell
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Johnathon Doenburg wrote:

                          Fort Leonard Wood Public Affairs director Tiffany Wood has provided the first official response to the shocking....

                          I am always amazed that people are not smart enough to figure out that if we are capable of creating a vast conspiracy then we are certainly capable of keeping it from leaking. And completely ignoring that the same capability allows for the possibility of misinformation campaigns.

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T TPFKAPB

                            You Americans Fucking crack me up! :laugh:

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            jschell
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            TPFKAPB wrote:

                            You Americans f***ing crack me up!

                            But of course free thought and speech does not imply that is is reasonable nor even sane.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • J jschell

                              Johnathon Doenburg wrote:

                              Fort Leonard Wood Public Affairs director Tiffany Wood has provided the first official response to the shocking....

                              I am always amazed that people are not smart enough to figure out that if we are capable of creating a vast conspiracy then we are certainly capable of keeping it from leaking. And completely ignoring that the same capability allows for the possibility of misinformation campaigns.

                              L Offline
                              L Offline
                              Lost User
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              This is the type of response that leads me to believe that there are too many people abd that the vast majority of them need to be eliminated. Trendy belief #1: A criminal operation is never known, therefor a justice system is redundant (if you even know what redundant means or what if means or what means means)

                              J 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L Lost User

                                This is the type of response that leads me to believe that there are too many people abd that the vast majority of them need to be eliminated. Trendy belief #1: A criminal operation is never known, therefor a justice system is redundant (if you even know what redundant means or what if means or what means means)

                                J Offline
                                J Offline
                                jschell
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                Johnathon Doenburg wrote:

                                This is the type of response that leads me to believe that there are too many people abd that the vast majority of them need to be eliminated.

                                That statement of course has absolutely nothing to do with what I said. Less people (to any reasonable extent) would not make what I said less nor more true.

                                L 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J jschell

                                  Johnathon Doenburg wrote:

                                  This is the type of response that leads me to believe that there are too many people abd that the vast majority of them need to be eliminated.

                                  That statement of course has absolutely nothing to do with what I said. Less people (to any reasonable extent) would not make what I said less nor more true.

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  Lost User
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Thats because it was total bullshit to begin with. Drink your fluoride, take your vaccines, nothing to worry about.

                                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    Thats because it was total bullshit to begin with. Drink your fluoride, take your vaccines, nothing to worry about.

                                    J Offline
                                    J Offline
                                    jschell
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #17

                                    Johnathon Doenburg wrote:

                                    Thats because it was total bullsh*t to begin with. Drink your fluoride, take your vaccines, nothing to worry about.

                                    First I know exactly the validity and context of what I said. Second I also know that your statements have no logical correctness in terms of what I said. And your statement was logically incorrect which means it has nothing to do with my first statement. Of course neither does the current statement.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    Reply
                                    • Reply as topic
                                    Log in to reply
                                    • Oldest to Newest
                                    • Newest to Oldest
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Login

                                    • Don't have an account? Register

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Categories
                                    • Recent
                                    • Tags
                                    • Popular
                                    • World
                                    • Users
                                    • Groups