Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Ubuntu and Windows

Ubuntu and Windows

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
linuxquestioncsssysadmindiscussion
60 Posts 32 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Collin Biedenkapp

    Hi there guys, This is a question I have been dying to ask. I currently dual boot Ubuntu and Windows, but rebooting is a pain. So, my question is this: Of those of you that have used Windows (or use it still), if you've used Ubuntu, which did you like better and why? I am trying to decide if it is time to install Windows in a VBox from Ubuntu or vice-versa. I need a Linux environment regardless as I am developing a Linux server-side application. I like Ubuntu, and it is faster and safer than Windows, but it is less polished in some ways (IMO) than Windows. I have used Windows 8 and it seems that there are some drastic, less than idea (again, IMO) changes coming along. I am preparing to have to line myself up with another OS. Opinions everyone?

    Collin Biedenkapp

    L Offline
    L Offline
    lewax00
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    I suggest Ubuntu VM in a Windows environment, it's always worked well for me.

    T M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • C Collin Biedenkapp

      Hi there guys, This is a question I have been dying to ask. I currently dual boot Ubuntu and Windows, but rebooting is a pain. So, my question is this: Of those of you that have used Windows (or use it still), if you've used Ubuntu, which did you like better and why? I am trying to decide if it is time to install Windows in a VBox from Ubuntu or vice-versa. I need a Linux environment regardless as I am developing a Linux server-side application. I like Ubuntu, and it is faster and safer than Windows, but it is less polished in some ways (IMO) than Windows. I have used Windows 8 and it seems that there are some drastic, less than idea (again, IMO) changes coming along. I am preparing to have to line myself up with another OS. Opinions everyone?

      Collin Biedenkapp

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Slacker007
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Why not just Windows 7 and scratch the 8?

      "the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
      "No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "But you probably have the smoothest scrotum of any grown man" - Pete O'Hanlon (2012)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Collin Biedenkapp

        Hi there guys, This is a question I have been dying to ask. I currently dual boot Ubuntu and Windows, but rebooting is a pain. So, my question is this: Of those of you that have used Windows (or use it still), if you've used Ubuntu, which did you like better and why? I am trying to decide if it is time to install Windows in a VBox from Ubuntu or vice-versa. I need a Linux environment regardless as I am developing a Linux server-side application. I like Ubuntu, and it is faster and safer than Windows, but it is less polished in some ways (IMO) than Windows. I have used Windows 8 and it seems that there are some drastic, less than idea (again, IMO) changes coming along. I am preparing to have to line myself up with another OS. Opinions everyone?

        Collin Biedenkapp

        M Offline
        M Offline
        M dHatter
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        ubuntu os, windows xp virtual box vm <--- been using it for years without reinstall and no crash

        01101111 01100010 01101010 01100101 01100011 01110100 01110011 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01101101 01101001 01110010 01110010 01101111 01110010 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100011 01101100 01101111 01110011 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 01111001 00100000 01100001 01110000 01110000 01100101 01100001 01110010

        L U 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • C Collin Biedenkapp

          Hi there guys, This is a question I have been dying to ask. I currently dual boot Ubuntu and Windows, but rebooting is a pain. So, my question is this: Of those of you that have used Windows (or use it still), if you've used Ubuntu, which did you like better and why? I am trying to decide if it is time to install Windows in a VBox from Ubuntu or vice-versa. I need a Linux environment regardless as I am developing a Linux server-side application. I like Ubuntu, and it is faster and safer than Windows, but it is less polished in some ways (IMO) than Windows. I have used Windows 8 and it seems that there are some drastic, less than idea (again, IMO) changes coming along. I am preparing to have to line myself up with another OS. Opinions everyone?

          Collin Biedenkapp

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          I would recomend using Windows with a VM for Ubuntu. The simple reason is performance. The benefits that windows has as you say more "polished" are mostly lost when VMing into it. Most of the things you need in Ubuntu will be fine when using a VM though. Atleast most the things I can think of.

          Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Collin Biedenkapp

            Hi there guys, This is a question I have been dying to ask. I currently dual boot Ubuntu and Windows, but rebooting is a pain. So, my question is this: Of those of you that have used Windows (or use it still), if you've used Ubuntu, which did you like better and why? I am trying to decide if it is time to install Windows in a VBox from Ubuntu or vice-versa. I need a Linux environment regardless as I am developing a Linux server-side application. I like Ubuntu, and it is faster and safer than Windows, but it is less polished in some ways (IMO) than Windows. I have used Windows 8 and it seems that there are some drastic, less than idea (again, IMO) changes coming along. I am preparing to have to line myself up with another OS. Opinions everyone?

            Collin Biedenkapp

            G Offline
            G Offline
            Gary Wheeler
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            I'm currently dual-booting Win7 and Ubuntu, as I have a contract job that requires Ubuntu. I generally agree with your assessment. Ubuntu is faster and more responsive than Win7, but it has more rough edges than Windows. I wouldn't know about 'safer', other than to surmise that Ubuntu is safer chiefly because it is a far less prominent target. It sounds like Ubuntu is your normal working environment. My preference would be to definitely keep that as a 'native' boot. My suggestion is to buy a second computer, dedicate one to Ubuntu, the other to Windows. I've used enough virtual machines now that I prefer to test natively whenever possible. There always seems to be behavior differences between native boots and virtual machines that cause grief when testing.

            Software Zen: delete this;

            A J T 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • C Collin Biedenkapp

              Hi there guys, This is a question I have been dying to ask. I currently dual boot Ubuntu and Windows, but rebooting is a pain. So, my question is this: Of those of you that have used Windows (or use it still), if you've used Ubuntu, which did you like better and why? I am trying to decide if it is time to install Windows in a VBox from Ubuntu or vice-versa. I need a Linux environment regardless as I am developing a Linux server-side application. I like Ubuntu, and it is faster and safer than Windows, but it is less polished in some ways (IMO) than Windows. I have used Windows 8 and it seems that there are some drastic, less than idea (again, IMO) changes coming along. I am preparing to have to line myself up with another OS. Opinions everyone?

              Collin Biedenkapp

              G Offline
              G Offline
              GuyThiebaut
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              You may well know this but I will mention it anyway as it caught me out. If you have a dual boot machine and remove or reformat the Ubuntu partition you may lose the ability to boot into Windows. What you need to do is rebuild the Master boot Record so that you reboot into Windows after you have removed the dual partition. There are tools out there which will do this for you - I mention this as I was caught out and even though I thought I was prepared it took me the best part of an evening to find something that would rebuild the MBR for Windows. I used Hiren's BootCD[^] to recreate the MBR. This is why I would recommend using something like Oracle's VirtualBox[^] as it is clean and you won't run into the issue with removing a dual boot from your computer.

              “That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”

              ― Christopher Hitchens

              Richard Andrew x64R K U D 4 Replies Last reply
              0
              • C Collin Biedenkapp

                Hi there guys, This is a question I have been dying to ask. I currently dual boot Ubuntu and Windows, but rebooting is a pain. So, my question is this: Of those of you that have used Windows (or use it still), if you've used Ubuntu, which did you like better and why? I am trying to decide if it is time to install Windows in a VBox from Ubuntu or vice-versa. I need a Linux environment regardless as I am developing a Linux server-side application. I like Ubuntu, and it is faster and safer than Windows, but it is less polished in some ways (IMO) than Windows. I have used Windows 8 and it seems that there are some drastic, less than idea (again, IMO) changes coming along. I am preparing to have to line myself up with another OS. Opinions everyone?

                Collin Biedenkapp

                W Offline
                W Offline
                W Balboos GHB
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                For what it's worth: I loaded Ubuntu as the second partition on a Windows Box: No Problems. I loaded Windows as second partition on an Ubuntu box: it destroyed grub and I had to restore it and other sundry entries to even see Ubuntu again. Windows does not play nice with others - and entrusting your Ubuntu to the care of Windows (VM or otherwise) in my opinion, is risky business - and since it is your business at stake, is it a gamble you wish to take?

                "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

                "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                L A D 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • G Gary Wheeler

                  I'm currently dual-booting Win7 and Ubuntu, as I have a contract job that requires Ubuntu. I generally agree with your assessment. Ubuntu is faster and more responsive than Win7, but it has more rough edges than Windows. I wouldn't know about 'safer', other than to surmise that Ubuntu is safer chiefly because it is a far less prominent target. It sounds like Ubuntu is your normal working environment. My preference would be to definitely keep that as a 'native' boot. My suggestion is to buy a second computer, dedicate one to Ubuntu, the other to Windows. I've used enough virtual machines now that I prefer to test natively whenever possible. There always seems to be behavior differences between native boots and virtual machines that cause grief when testing.

                  Software Zen: delete this;

                  A Offline
                  A Offline
                  Albert Holguin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Gary Wheeler wrote:

                  My suggestion is to buy a second computer, dedicate one to Ubuntu, the other to Windows.

                  I second this suggestion... :thumbsup:

                  Gary Wheeler wrote:

                  There always seems to be behavior differences between native boots and virtual machines that cause grief when testing.

                  Yep, sometimes you're not sure whether you're testing the VM software or your bug. Better off eliminating a middle man IMHO.

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Collin Biedenkapp

                    Hi there guys, This is a question I have been dying to ask. I currently dual boot Ubuntu and Windows, but rebooting is a pain. So, my question is this: Of those of you that have used Windows (or use it still), if you've used Ubuntu, which did you like better and why? I am trying to decide if it is time to install Windows in a VBox from Ubuntu or vice-versa. I need a Linux environment regardless as I am developing a Linux server-side application. I like Ubuntu, and it is faster and safer than Windows, but it is less polished in some ways (IMO) than Windows. I have used Windows 8 and it seems that there are some drastic, less than idea (again, IMO) changes coming along. I am preparing to have to line myself up with another OS. Opinions everyone?

                    Collin Biedenkapp

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Albert Holguin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    If I was going to do this, I'd have virtual-Windows inside of Linux. Windows needs to constantly reboot for updates, a stable Linux doesn't really have to do that (although Ubuntu does put out an ungodly number of updates sometimes). With that said however, if it's business related, I'd go with Gary's suggestion of just dishing out the cash to have a separate box for Linux (or Windows). Virtual machines are good for some things but not all.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • W W Balboos GHB

                      For what it's worth: I loaded Ubuntu as the second partition on a Windows Box: No Problems. I loaded Windows as second partition on an Ubuntu box: it destroyed grub and I had to restore it and other sundry entries to even see Ubuntu again. Windows does not play nice with others - and entrusting your Ubuntu to the care of Windows (VM or otherwise) in my opinion, is risky business - and since it is your business at stake, is it a gamble you wish to take?

                      "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                      "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

                      "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      lewax00
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      W∴ Balboos wrote:

                      Windows does not play nice with others - and entrusting your Ubuntu to the care of Windows (VM or otherwise) in my opinion, is risky business

                      Troubles with dual-booting doesn't translate to problems with VMs, those are entirely different scenarios (and Windows works just fine with VMs).

                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L lewax00

                        W∴ Balboos wrote:

                        Windows does not play nice with others - and entrusting your Ubuntu to the care of Windows (VM or otherwise) in my opinion, is risky business

                        Troubles with dual-booting doesn't translate to problems with VMs, those are entirely different scenarios (and Windows works just fine with VMs).

                        W Offline
                        W Offline
                        W Balboos GHB
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        lewax00 wrote:

                        and Windows works just fine with VMs

                        At least for now.

                        "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                        "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

                        "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • W W Balboos GHB

                          lewax00 wrote:

                          and Windows works just fine with VMs

                          At least for now.

                          "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                          "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

                          "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          lewax00
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Considering the contributions Microsoft has made to the Linux kernel in the interest of making it run smoothly as a VM on their platforms, I doubt it's changing anytime soon.

                          A 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • W W Balboos GHB

                            For what it's worth: I loaded Ubuntu as the second partition on a Windows Box: No Problems. I loaded Windows as second partition on an Ubuntu box: it destroyed grub and I had to restore it and other sundry entries to even see Ubuntu again. Windows does not play nice with others - and entrusting your Ubuntu to the care of Windows (VM or otherwise) in my opinion, is risky business - and since it is your business at stake, is it a gamble you wish to take?

                            "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                            "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

                            "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            Albert Holguin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            W∴ Balboos wrote:

                            I loaded Windows as second partition on an Ubuntu box: it destroyed grub

                            That's a well-known Windows issue... they overwrite the MBR and pretend they're the only OS on the machine. Although, they may have resolved this since WinXP (maybe? :doh: ).

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L lewax00

                              Considering the contributions Microsoft has made to the Linux kernel in the interest of making it run smoothly as a VM on their platforms, I doubt it's changing anytime soon.

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Albert Holguin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              Considering this has only happened within the last couple of years... it may change very soon. Depending on who's in charge at MS.

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Albert Holguin

                                Considering this has only happened within the last couple of years... it may change very soon. Depending on who's in charge at MS.

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                lewax00
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                At the very least I doubt MS would intentionally hinder VMs, because they have nothing to gain from doing so (and in fact would probably hurt them). Then again, parts of Windows 8 seems like terrible ideas, so maybe I'm assuming they're more rational than they actually are :doh:

                                A M B 3 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • L lewax00

                                  At the very least I doubt MS would intentionally hinder VMs, because they have nothing to gain from doing so (and in fact would probably hurt them). Then again, parts of Windows 8 seems like terrible ideas, so maybe I'm assuming they're more rational than they actually are :doh:

                                  A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  Albert Holguin
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  lewax00 wrote:

                                  At the very least I doubt MS would intentionally hinder VMs, because they have nothing to gain from doing so (and in fact would probably hurt them).

                                  Agree...

                                  lewax00 wrote:

                                  maybe I'm assuming they're more rational than they actually are

                                  :laugh:

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M M dHatter

                                    ubuntu os, windows xp virtual box vm <--- been using it for years without reinstall and no crash

                                    01101111 01100010 01101010 01100101 01100011 01110100 01110011 00100000 01101001 01101110 00100000 01101101 01101001 01110010 01110010 01101111 01110010 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100011 01101100 01101111 01110011 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 01111001 00100000 01100001 01110000 01110000 01100101 01100001 01110010

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    loctrice
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    I second that. This is what I used to do with Ubuntu, and now it's what I do with gentoo.

                                    If it moves, compile it

                                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Collin Biedenkapp

                                      Hi there guys, This is a question I have been dying to ask. I currently dual boot Ubuntu and Windows, but rebooting is a pain. So, my question is this: Of those of you that have used Windows (or use it still), if you've used Ubuntu, which did you like better and why? I am trying to decide if it is time to install Windows in a VBox from Ubuntu or vice-versa. I need a Linux environment regardless as I am developing a Linux server-side application. I like Ubuntu, and it is faster and safer than Windows, but it is less polished in some ways (IMO) than Windows. I have used Windows 8 and it seems that there are some drastic, less than idea (again, IMO) changes coming along. I am preparing to have to line myself up with another OS. Opinions everyone?

                                      Collin Biedenkapp

                                      M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mustafa Ismail Mustafa
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      I've been like that for near 3 years now, with Windows running from a VM. I personally rarely use windows these days. Microsoft lost me with Vista (what a dysmal failure that was). Windows 7 was quite good to be honest but by then I had moved on to better things (IMO :) ). I find this to be the perfect environment, but you do need something with a little oomph to it. I had to get an SSD drive and that really made a difference for my laptop. I'm going to be upgrading my laptop as soon as I'm properly settled in and see about getting an i5 with about 8GB of RAM.

                                      If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Quote worthy: I hereby claim this thread in the name of Drivel. Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]? Food

                                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • L lewax00

                                        At the very least I doubt MS would intentionally hinder VMs, because they have nothing to gain from doing so (and in fact would probably hurt them). Then again, parts of Windows 8 seems like terrible ideas, so maybe I'm assuming they're more rational than they actually are :doh:

                                        M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        Mustafa Ismail Mustafa
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        lewax00 wrote:

                                        Then again, parts of Windows 8 seems like terrible ideas, so maybe I'm assuming they're more rational than they actually are :doh:

                                        :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Classic!

                                        If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Quote worthy: I hereby claim this thread in the name of Drivel. Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]? Food

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G Gary Wheeler

                                          I'm currently dual-booting Win7 and Ubuntu, as I have a contract job that requires Ubuntu. I generally agree with your assessment. Ubuntu is faster and more responsive than Win7, but it has more rough edges than Windows. I wouldn't know about 'safer', other than to surmise that Ubuntu is safer chiefly because it is a far less prominent target. It sounds like Ubuntu is your normal working environment. My preference would be to definitely keep that as a 'native' boot. My suggestion is to buy a second computer, dedicate one to Ubuntu, the other to Windows. I've used enough virtual machines now that I prefer to test natively whenever possible. There always seems to be behavior differences between native boots and virtual machines that cause grief when testing.

                                          Software Zen: delete this;

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          jschell
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          Gary Wheeler wrote:

                                          There always seems to be behavior differences between native boots and virtual machines that cause grief when testing.

                                          With recent (version) VMs? If so could you provide an example of such a problem?

                                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups