does anyone of you misses the windows xp "up one level" button in windows seven explorer
-
yes we need it take this for example you make a search in the explorer then you find a folder and you enter to the folder, if you want to go up one level you cant because in the path is showed the search code.
I don't follow you.
Vasily Tserekh wrote:
you make a search in the explorer
I don't grok this.
-
i dont think a reasonable idea why they(ms) removed that button i miss him a lot :((
Press "alt+up" and done... Or any of the address bar fragments... It is muuuuch better than before... :thumbsup:
[www.tamautomation.com] Robots, CNC and PLC machines for grinding and polishing.
-
I did at first; but now I've been assimilated. :sigh: The new way is better.
The new way is hit and miss, and sometimes just shows the current folder, for some reason. Lots of times an "up" button would be easier.
-
i dont think a reasonable idea why they(ms) removed that button i miss him a lot :((
-
I don't follow you.
Vasily Tserekh wrote:
you make a search in the explorer
I don't grok this.
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
I don't grok this.
Allow a superior linguist to help here. He means he searched using the search toolbox in Windows Explorer. :-D
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
In the location bar, you can click one of the ancestor folders to navigate to it (including the direct parent). So they basically have ancestor buttons rather than a single parent button. Makes sense to me.
AspDotNetDev wrote:
ancestor buttons
I always referred to these as a breadcrumb trail...
Silence is golden... but duct tape is silver!! Booger Mobile - My bright green 1964 Ford Falcon - check out the blog here!! | If you feel generous - make a donation to Camp Quality!!
-
AspDotNetDev wrote:
ancestor buttons
I always referred to these as a breadcrumb trail...
Silence is golden... but duct tape is silver!! Booger Mobile - My bright green 1964 Ford Falcon - check out the blog here!! | If you feel generous - make a donation to Camp Quality!!
Indeed, that is a good label to apply to it. Though breadcrumbs sometimes show where you've been rather than just the hierarchy above where you are, and I wanted to make the point that the "button" didn't disappear... it just changed form.
-
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
I don't grok this.
Allow a superior linguist to help here. He means he searched using the search toolbox in Windows Explorer. :-D
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
Nish Sivakumar wrote:
the search toolbox in Windows Explorer
That's the part I don't grok. :sigh:
-
yes we need it take this for example you make a search in the explorer then you find a folder and you enter to the folder, if you want to go up one level you cant because in the path is showed the search code.
That's correct, but you can use the back arrow to go to the previous directory. And if you think about it a search result does not have an upper level directory.
-
Indeed, that is a good label to apply to it. Though breadcrumbs sometimes show where you've been rather than just the hierarchy above where you are, and I wanted to make the point that the "button" didn't disappear... it just changed form.
AspDotNetDev wrote:
Though breadcrumbs sometimes show where you've been rather than just the hierarchy
well said.
"the meat from that butcher is just the dogs danglies, absolutely amazing cuts of beef." - DaveAuld (2011)
"No, that is just the earthly manifestation of the Great God Retardon." - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "It is the celestial scrotum of good luck!" - Nagy Vilmos (2011) "But you probably have the smoothest scrotum of any grown man" - Pete O'Hanlon (2012) -
i dont think a reasonable idea why they(ms) removed that button i miss him a lot :((
Just click on the name of the directory folder in the address bar that is one up from where you are. With that technique, you aren't limited to going up one level at a time. Much quicker.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
-
Nish Sivakumar wrote:
the search toolbox in Windows Explorer
That's the part I don't grok. :sigh:
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
That's the part I don't grok. :sigh:
It's a Windows 7 feature I guess, and I assume you are on Vista or earlier?
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
That's the part I don't grok. :sigh:
It's a Windows 7 feature I guess, and I assume you are on Vista or earlier?
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
Nope, 7 at home and work. Maybe send a picture.
-
Nope, 7 at home and work. Maybe send a picture.
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
Maybe send a picture.
See http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/Uploads/20248/PIEBALDconsult.jpg[^] Look at the top-right side of the pic.
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
Maybe send a picture.
See http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/Uploads/20248/PIEBALDconsult.jpg[^] Look at the top-right side of the pic.
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
Yeah, I don't have that. And I wouldn't use it. Maybe I got rid of it somehow. :shrug:
-
Yeah, I don't have that. And I wouldn't use it. Maybe I got rid of it somehow. :shrug:
