I'm glad I don't work in Intelligence
-
Personnel will be subject to lie detector testing whenever a leak occurs [^] :sigh:
Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am
-
Personnel will be subject to lie detector testing whenever a leak occurs [^] :sigh:
Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am
Article states:
These new rules do not apply to U.S. military with security clearances not assigned to an intelligence agency, or to White House officials or members of Congress.
It seems the inner party members get to turn of their telescreens, and the proles are too ignorant to monitor. :|
-
Personnel will be subject to lie detector testing whenever a leak occurs [^] :sigh:
Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am
Steve Mayfield wrote:
I'm glad I don't work in Intelligence
Yes, work in ignorance is a much better alternative, you will never be subject to lie detector because nobody believes you are smart enough to lie. :-D
-
Personnel will be subject to lie detector testing whenever a leak occurs [^] :sigh:
Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am
I'm surprised they didn't do this before... :doh: ...although I'm not sure they would admit to anything specific they do or not do ("I did not have s... relations with that woman..."). :suss: Would this work to plug the leaks --> :thumbsup:
-
Personnel will be subject to lie detector testing whenever a leak occurs [^] :sigh:
Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am
The current justice department will just ignore any findings and refuse to prosecute. Dave.
-
Steve Mayfield wrote:
I'm glad I don't work in Intelligence
Yes, work in ignorance is a much better alternative, you will never be subject to lie detector because nobody believes you are smart enough to lie. :-D
So, if we hire only exceptionally stupid people, the leaks won't occur?
FILETIME to time_t
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | WhoIncludes - Analyzing C++ include file hierarchy
