Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Dark matter bridge discovered

Dark matter bridge discovered

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
com
7 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Steve Mayfield
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    between Galaxy Clusters [^] :omg: :thumbsup:

    Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

    M R H P 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • S Steve Mayfield

      between Galaxy Clusters [^] :omg: :thumbsup:

      Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Mark_Wallace
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Extremely interesting. Ever since I was a kid, and first started thinking about this kind of stuff (bearing in mind that there were still believers in the steady state theory, at the time) I figured it made sense that, if the matter "suddenly" expanded ("suddenly" being according to clocks that we, at our gravity level, invented), there should be sort of a broken lattice of particulate matter between galaxies, but no-one i ever discussed the idea with thought it had legs (I was a Physics wallah, before the PC came along, so i had a lot of that kind of discussion). The closest analogy I came up with is the effect you see when you scatter a liquid with a specific surface tension across another liquid with a different surface tension -- but gravity is a lot weaker than surface tension, and the gradient is in temperature, rather than density, so the lattice effect should be more pronounced, out there in the black. That was according to me, at least. Everyone else seemed to be convinced that gravity wells would suck up all but the smallest amounts of particulate mass. But now it looks like I was right all along -- and that a lot of my corollary Ideas that went with it are more likely to be correct (or closer to the money, at least), too. Damn, but I wish I could go back and rub a few people's noses in it. I suppose a bunch of guys who are still in the field will now get famous by coming up with ideas that I had decades ago.

      I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

      D 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Steve Mayfield

        between Galaxy Clusters [^] :omg: :thumbsup:

        Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Rajesh R Subramanian
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Extremely interesting read. It's amazing how much stuff is out there, leading to the realisation of our insignificance. God particle's existence almost proved, and now dark matter's existence proved. The boffins can now start looking into tele-porting humans more seriously. :)

        "Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Mark_Wallace

          Extremely interesting. Ever since I was a kid, and first started thinking about this kind of stuff (bearing in mind that there were still believers in the steady state theory, at the time) I figured it made sense that, if the matter "suddenly" expanded ("suddenly" being according to clocks that we, at our gravity level, invented), there should be sort of a broken lattice of particulate matter between galaxies, but no-one i ever discussed the idea with thought it had legs (I was a Physics wallah, before the PC came along, so i had a lot of that kind of discussion). The closest analogy I came up with is the effect you see when you scatter a liquid with a specific surface tension across another liquid with a different surface tension -- but gravity is a lot weaker than surface tension, and the gradient is in temperature, rather than density, so the lattice effect should be more pronounced, out there in the black. That was according to me, at least. Everyone else seemed to be convinced that gravity wells would suck up all but the smallest amounts of particulate mass. But now it looks like I was right all along -- and that a lot of my corollary Ideas that went with it are more likely to be correct (or closer to the money, at least), too. Damn, but I wish I could go back and rub a few people's noses in it. I suppose a bunch of guys who are still in the field will now get famous by coming up with ideas that I had decades ago.

          I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dalek Dave
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Come off it Mark. When you were a kid people still thought the Sun went round the Earth :)

          --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] English League Tables - Live

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Steve Mayfield

            between Galaxy Clusters [^] :omg: :thumbsup:

            Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

            H Offline
            H Offline
            hairy_hats
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I don't think Dark Matter exists - at least in its current form of particles that only interact via gravity. I think that it's more likely that our models are flawed.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Dalek Dave

              Come off it Mark. When you were a kid people still thought the Sun went round the Earth :)

              --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^] English League Tables - Live

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Mark_Wallace
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Dalek Dave wrote:

              When you were a kid people still thought the Sun went round the Earth

              Look, I was right about the particulate mass, so I'm right about that, too! Bluddy idjits, building complex mathematical models to try to prove that the Earth goes around the Sun -- Fools, all of them!

              I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Steve Mayfield

                between Galaxy Clusters [^] :omg: :thumbsup:

                Steve _________________ I C(++) therefore I am

                P Offline
                P Offline
                Pierre Leclercq
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                10 :omg: :confused: X| :~ :wtf: 20 GOTO 10

                You can't turn lead into gold, unless you've built yourself a nuclear plant.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups