Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Sorting pictures

Sorting pictures

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
algorithmsquestion
15 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Rage

    After 6 years of using a digital reflex camera, I've got about 270 GB of pictures to sort. Usually, sorting means : going through the pictures, make a selection, review, ditch what I did not select. Or going through the picture, copy some of them to another directory. Is there any decent piece of software that can do that easily ? e.g. If a picture is displayed and I hit a key, the picture is copied to a target directory and the next one is displayed ? Or the picture is selected, the next one is displayed and I can review the selection when I have been through all the files ?

    ~RaGE();

    I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb

    D Offline
    D Offline
    Dalek Dave
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    You're a programmer! JHC, get on and write it :)

    --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Jacquers

      Sounds like a pretty easy program to code... :)

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Rage
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Exactly what I was thinking. Maybe a way to finally get into the C# world. Thanks for confirming my intentions :-)

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Rage

        Exactly what I was thinking. Maybe a way to finally get into the C# world. Thanks for confirming my intentions :-)

        A Offline
        A Offline
        Andrei Straut
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Remember, if you get stuck, you can always use Q&A[^] :-D But, please, first read the Questions FAQ

        Full-fledged Java/.NET lover, full-fledged PHP hater. Full-fledged Google/Microsoft lover, full-fledged Apple hater. Full-fledged Skype lover, full-fledged YM hater.

        R 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Andrei Straut

          Remember, if you get stuck, you can always use Q&A[^] :-D But, please, first read the Questions FAQ

          Full-fledged Java/.NET lover, full-fledged PHP hater. Full-fledged Google/Microsoft lover, full-fledged Apple hater. Full-fledged Skype lover, full-fledged YM hater.

          R Offline
          R Offline
          Rage
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          As an earlier follower, I have the privilege to ask programming questions in the Lounge. And my mother does not want me to go in Q&A.

          A 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Rage

            After 6 years of using a digital reflex camera, I've got about 270 GB of pictures to sort. Usually, sorting means : going through the pictures, make a selection, review, ditch what I did not select. Or going through the picture, copy some of them to another directory. Is there any decent piece of software that can do that easily ? e.g. If a picture is displayed and I hit a key, the picture is copied to a target directory and the next one is displayed ? Or the picture is selected, the next one is displayed and I can review the selection when I have been through all the files ?

            ~RaGE();

            I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Maximilien
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            (as someone else's wrote it might be easy to code, except for dealing RAW images, probably easy, but I've not given it some thought) I use Lightroom to manage my collection. One of the best software buy in a long time. typical workflow : - import images (from camera/disk) (for me, it's "by date"), add keywords and tags. - go through the collection, discard bad images (out-of-focus, bad exposures, ... ), mark and rate images I want to absolutely keep (1-5, stars,colors,... ). - filter out discarded images to see only one I want to keep. ( you can set filtering while you work, so you only see the marked images) - create (smart) collection and drag all good images to collection. - go to collection, and edit/process images (export to flickr or facebook) I do not delete images from HDD unless really bad. Couple of months later, I go through the images again and review all the picked images and will them delete the ones I do not like ... (in general, I do this 2, 3 times and end up with 1%-4% images that I take in one "session". M.

            Watched code never compiles.

            R 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • M Maximilien

              (as someone else's wrote it might be easy to code, except for dealing RAW images, probably easy, but I've not given it some thought) I use Lightroom to manage my collection. One of the best software buy in a long time. typical workflow : - import images (from camera/disk) (for me, it's "by date"), add keywords and tags. - go through the collection, discard bad images (out-of-focus, bad exposures, ... ), mark and rate images I want to absolutely keep (1-5, stars,colors,... ). - filter out discarded images to see only one I want to keep. ( you can set filtering while you work, so you only see the marked images) - create (smart) collection and drag all good images to collection. - go to collection, and edit/process images (export to flickr or facebook) I do not delete images from HDD unless really bad. Couple of months later, I go through the images again and review all the picked images and will them delete the ones I do not like ... (in general, I do this 2, 3 times and end up with 1%-4% images that I take in one "session". M.

              Watched code never compiles.

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Rage
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Sounds pretty good :thumbsup:

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Maximilien

                (as someone else's wrote it might be easy to code, except for dealing RAW images, probably easy, but I've not given it some thought) I use Lightroom to manage my collection. One of the best software buy in a long time. typical workflow : - import images (from camera/disk) (for me, it's "by date"), add keywords and tags. - go through the collection, discard bad images (out-of-focus, bad exposures, ... ), mark and rate images I want to absolutely keep (1-5, stars,colors,... ). - filter out discarded images to see only one I want to keep. ( you can set filtering while you work, so you only see the marked images) - create (smart) collection and drag all good images to collection. - go to collection, and edit/process images (export to flickr or facebook) I do not delete images from HDD unless really bad. Couple of months later, I go through the images again and review all the picked images and will them delete the ones I do not like ... (in general, I do this 2, 3 times and end up with 1%-4% images that I take in one "session". M.

                Watched code never compiles.

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Rage
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Just checked, 100€. Ouch.

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Rage

                  After 6 years of using a digital reflex camera, I've got about 270 GB of pictures to sort. Usually, sorting means : going through the pictures, make a selection, review, ditch what I did not select. Or going through the picture, copy some of them to another directory. Is there any decent piece of software that can do that easily ? e.g. If a picture is displayed and I hit a key, the picture is copied to a target directory and the next one is displayed ? Or the picture is selected, the next one is displayed and I can review the selection when I have been through all the files ?

                  ~RaGE();

                  I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Write one .

                  ================================================== The greatest trick the U.S Govt ever played on the world was getting people to think that Satellite Torture was all about crazy people...

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Rage

                    As an earlier follower, I have the privilege to ask programming questions in the Lounge. And my mother does not want me to go in Q&A.

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Andrei Straut
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Rage wrote:

                    And my mother does not want me to go in Q&A.

                    I wish my mom told me that when I was young. Oh, The Horrors! THE HORRORS!

                    Full-fledged Java/.NET lover, full-fledged PHP hater. Full-fledged Google/Microsoft lover, full-fledged Apple hater. Full-fledged Skype lover, full-fledged YM hater.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Rage

                      Just checked, 100€. Ouch.

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Maximilien
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      100€ well spent. It just works and it works very well.

                      Watched code never compiles.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Rage

                        After 6 years of using a digital reflex camera, I've got about 270 GB of pictures to sort. Usually, sorting means : going through the pictures, make a selection, review, ditch what I did not select. Or going through the picture, copy some of them to another directory. Is there any decent piece of software that can do that easily ? e.g. If a picture is displayed and I hit a key, the picture is copied to a target directory and the next one is displayed ? Or the picture is selected, the next one is displayed and I can review the selection when I have been through all the files ?

                        ~RaGE();

                        I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Slacker007
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        ACDSee. I have used it for years and so should you. :) http://www.acdsee.com/[^]

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Rage

                          After 6 years of using a digital reflex camera, I've got about 270 GB of pictures to sort. Usually, sorting means : going through the pictures, make a selection, review, ditch what I did not select. Or going through the picture, copy some of them to another directory. Is there any decent piece of software that can do that easily ? e.g. If a picture is displayed and I hit a key, the picture is copied to a target directory and the next one is displayed ? Or the picture is selected, the next one is displayed and I can review the selection when I have been through all the files ?

                          ~RaGE();

                          I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Don M
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          If all you are concerned with is selection (not editing, etc.), then Pixort[^] is an excellent tool. The free version works fine (non commercial use). This gives you a one keystroke operation to dispatch a file to another folder and move to the next image. Pixort also lets you easily compare photos as you sort and select, which you may want to do to select the "best" shot. Another option is Irfanview [^]. Configure folders for the "Move" (F7) and "Copy" (F8) commands. This becomes 3 keystrokes to move a file to a specific folder and go to the next image. Sure you could write it, but why re-invent the wheel?

                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Don M

                            If all you are concerned with is selection (not editing, etc.), then Pixort[^] is an excellent tool. The free version works fine (non commercial use). This gives you a one keystroke operation to dispatch a file to another folder and move to the next image. Pixort also lets you easily compare photos as you sort and select, which you may want to do to select the "best" shot. Another option is Irfanview [^]. Configure folders for the "Move" (F7) and "Copy" (F8) commands. This becomes 3 keystrokes to move a file to a specific folder and go to the next image. Sure you could write it, but why re-invent the wheel?

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Rage
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Pixort seems to be what I was looking for, a thousand thanks !

                            Don M wrote:

                            Sure you could write it, but why re-invent the wheel?

                            Precisely why I posted here first.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups