Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Does reduced fat really prolong our lives?

Does reduced fat really prolong our lives?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
question
25 Posts 13 Posters 3 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    Fat is good for you. The problem is sugar, which gets added even more to 'lo-fat' food to improve the taste.

    Every man can tell how many goats or sheep he possesses, but not how many friends. Shed Petition[^]

    J Offline
    J Offline
    jim lahey
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    Very good point. Sugar/refined carbohydrate and hydrogenated fats are the problem. Even saturated fat isn't bad for you. The body has a maximum limit to the amount of non-hydrogenated fat that can be absorbed, the rest gets excreted.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Anna Jayne Metcalfe

      Treadmills don't tend to do hills very well. I also like to be able to vary my pace without pressing buttons.

      Anna :rose: Tech Blog | Visual Lint "Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"

      L Offline
      L Offline
      loctrice
      wrote on last edited by
      #17

      Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:

      Treadmills don't tend to do hills very well.

      The incline feature works great, though not all of them have it.

      Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:

      I also like to be able to vary my pace without pressing buttons

      I can agree with that. Pre-workout settings will vary your speed for you, but they are pre-set.

      If it moves, compile it

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L loctrice

        Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:

        Treadmills don't tend to do hills very well.

        The incline feature works great, though not all of them have it.

        Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:

        I also like to be able to vary my pace without pressing buttons

        I can agree with that. Pre-workout settings will vary your speed for you, but they are pre-set.

        If it moves, compile it

        A Offline
        A Offline
        Anna Jayne Metcalfe
        wrote on last edited by
        #18

        I'm a big fan of trail running. There's just something about running under the trees that you just can't get on a treadmill. One of my favourite bits is those fast, steep descents where you have to bounce all the way down to avoid going flying. You definitely can't do that on a treadmill - they can't replicate the uneven surfaces or the tree branches lying in ambush!

        Anna :rose: Tech Blog | Visual Lint "Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Anna Jayne Metcalfe

          I'm a big fan of trail running. There's just something about running under the trees that you just can't get on a treadmill. One of my favourite bits is those fast, steep descents where you have to bounce all the way down to avoid going flying. You definitely can't do that on a treadmill - they can't replicate the uneven surfaces or the tree branches lying in ambush!

          Anna :rose: Tech Blog | Visual Lint "Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"

          L Offline
          L Offline
          loctrice
          wrote on last edited by
          #19

          Trail running is one thing I want to do more of. However, you can't get me to a trail in time to work out before work. There just isn't time for it.

          If it moves, compile it

          A 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L loctrice

            Trail running is one thing I want to do more of. However, you can't get me to a trail in time to work out before work. There just isn't time for it.

            If it moves, compile it

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Anna Jayne Metcalfe
            wrote on last edited by
            #20

            We're a bit lucky there - we live a few minutes walk from the nearest park, and as we work for ourselves, we can choose what time of the day we run.

            Anna :rose: Tech Blog | Visual Lint "Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Slacker007

              or does it just make us think we are a little healthier when we eat something with no flavor?

              P Offline
              P Offline
              PIEBALDconsult
              wrote on last edited by
              #21

              Contrary to what Yogi Berra said -- fat tastes good. As has been said: moderation. And while we're on the subject of healthy(er) eating -- sugar may be bad, but the substitutes are worse.

              Slacker007 wrote:

              when we eat something with no flavor

              Yeah, I don't do that.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Slacker007

                or does it just make us think we are a little healthier when we eat something with no flavor?

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #22

                Slacker007 wrote:

                Does reduced fat really prolong our lives?

                No, the opposite[^] might be true. ..but the idea does feed a lot of mouths, since it produces income for the food-industry, the sport-schools, doctors, lawyers, pharma, dentists.. Your cells might prefer saturated fat as a primary building block. Sugar isn't evil either; but in large enough (read, "supersized") quantities, even water becomes poisonous.

                Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L loctrice

                  I run outside a lot, but I actually prefer a treadmill.

                  If it moves, compile it

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  Gary Wheeler
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  loctrice wrote:

                  I actually prefer a treadmill

                  Either the 'scenery' at your gym is truly exceptional, or the countryside where you live completely sucks. To my mind, the worst run outdoors is better than the best workout on the treadmill.

                  Software Zen: delete this;

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Anna Jayne Metcalfe

                    It depends. You can't be truly healthy unless you're also fit - and you won't be that unless your diet is balanced (which means appropriate levels of fat, sugar, carbs, protein etc.), and you exercise appropriately. 10 years or so back, I weighed about the same as I do now - but I'm now far fitter (I took up road/off-road running) and it shows whenever I'm doing anything that involves exertion. Back then, I'd struggle to run around the block - now I'm quite happy to run 4-5 miles every day. Statistically, that should mean I have a better chance of living longer, but of course you can never tell what will happen re lifespan on a person by person basis. Alone I'm not statistically significant, but across an entire population it certainly holds.

                    Anna :rose: Tech Blog | Visual Lint "Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mark_Wallace
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:

                    Back then, I'd struggle to run around the block

                    I never have to run around any blocks, so, given that building muscle groups into optimal shapes for doing things that you will never do is bad for you, I think I'll skip the running, ta very much.

                    I mean, do I look French?

                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Mark_Wallace

                      Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote:

                      Back then, I'd struggle to run around the block

                      I never have to run around any blocks, so, given that building muscle groups into optimal shapes for doing things that you will never do is bad for you, I think I'll skip the running, ta very much.

                      I mean, do I look French?

                      A Offline
                      A Offline
                      Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      I don't run around the block, but the park - 5 days a week, on average. It's a personal choice. Personally, I'd rather be fit than the alternative (which I've also experienced, and put me in a place I really don't want to go back to).

                      Anna :rose: Tech Blog | Visual Lint "Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups