Profanity in code
-
So I think the guy before me wanted to spell the word 'Assigned' in his C# method name but ended up saying
public int UpdateReasonNotAssgiggedFlag(IEnumerable downtimes)
{
// ...
}Excuse the profanity, but I wonder what it feels like to get "ass-gigged." Anyway, I corrected the "misspelling..."
Sincerely Yours, Brian Hart
-
So I think the guy before me wanted to spell the word 'Assigned' in his C# method name but ended up saying
public int UpdateReasonNotAssgiggedFlag(IEnumerable downtimes)
{
// ...
}Excuse the profanity, but I wonder what it feels like to get "ass-gigged." Anyway, I corrected the "misspelling..."
Sincerely Yours, Brian Hart
-
Sounds like a reporting method for use in a prison web service.
If (DropSoap && !A##Gi##ed){
Update....
}(please accept my appologies too - Just couldn't resist). :-O
So that's why they call it the "soapbox"...
-
Sounds like a reporting method for use in a prison web service.
If (DropSoap && !A##Gi##ed){
Update....
}(please accept my appologies too - Just couldn't resist). :-O
-
So I think the guy before me wanted to spell the word 'Assigned' in his C# method name but ended up saying
public int UpdateReasonNotAssgiggedFlag(IEnumerable downtimes)
{
// ...
}Excuse the profanity, but I wonder what it feels like to get "ass-gigged." Anyway, I corrected the "misspelling..."
Sincerely Yours, Brian Hart
-
So I think the guy before me wanted to spell the word 'Assigned' in his C# method name but ended up saying
public int UpdateReasonNotAssgiggedFlag(IEnumerable downtimes)
{
// ...
}Excuse the profanity, but I wonder what it feels like to get "ass-gigged." Anyway, I corrected the "misspelling..."
Sincerely Yours, Brian Hart
I've never cursed in my executable code, but I have in comments a number of times.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
I've never cursed in my executable code, but I have in comments a number of times.
Software Zen:
delete this;Gary Wheeler wrote:
I've never cursed in my executable code, but I have in comments a number of times.
Which is another good reason not to write comments.
-
Gary Wheeler wrote:
I've never cursed in my executable code, but I have in comments a number of times.
Which is another good reason not to write comments.
In the cases I recall, my cursing was an accurate technical description of the situation I was addressing. The point of a comment is to describe what your code cannot. If my code has to do something that looks unnecessary or stupid because someone else is an idiot, you bet damn Skippy I'm going to document it. If my language in the comment is a little 'colorful', it's because the circumstances were so outrageous it was warranted.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
In the cases I recall, my cursing was an accurate technical description of the situation I was addressing. The point of a comment is to describe what your code cannot. If my code has to do something that looks unnecessary or stupid because someone else is an idiot, you bet damn Skippy I'm going to document it. If my language in the comment is a little 'colorful', it's because the circumstances were so outrageous it was warranted.
Software Zen:
delete this;A few years ago I was so upset because of a problem that my variable declaration was string fick = "dich"; which is german for string f*** = "you"; unfortunately I forgot to change that back before checking in... o_O thank goodness my department chief had a lot of humor; there were no further consequencies... Lessons learned: Curse loud, not in source! :-D
-
In the cases I recall, my cursing was an accurate technical description of the situation I was addressing. The point of a comment is to describe what your code cannot. If my code has to do something that looks unnecessary or stupid because someone else is an idiot, you bet damn Skippy I'm going to document it. If my language in the comment is a little 'colorful', it's because the circumstances were so outrageous it was warranted.
Software Zen:
delete this;Gary Wheeler wrote:
The point of a comment is to describe what your code cannot.
Agree, that's IMO the only justifiable cause for a comment. However, IME, such situations are rare, and can almost always be avoided by rephrasing your code.
-
Gary Wheeler wrote:
The point of a comment is to describe what your code cannot.
Agree, that's IMO the only justifiable cause for a comment. However, IME, such situations are rare, and can almost always be avoided by rephrasing your code.
Hmm. My environment is process control (we make commercial ink-jet printing systems), where we manage a lot of diverse hardware. The API's we use often bear little resemblance to the actions taken by the machine. Hence, we document. We document a lot.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
I've never cursed in my executable code, but I have in comments a number of times.
Software Zen:
delete this;The trailblazing operating system MCP was approx 250k lines of Espol, a high-level language based on Algol with extra instructions like Halt and Heyu. Multi-processor, virtual memory, open source - this was around 40 years ago! Anyway, it had a process creation function called motherforker(); when executives realised the meaning of open source it was renamed to anabolism().
-- Richard Ross-Langley
-
The trailblazing operating system MCP was approx 250k lines of Espol, a high-level language based on Algol with extra instructions like Halt and Heyu. Multi-processor, virtual memory, open source - this was around 40 years ago! Anyway, it had a process creation function called motherforker(); when executives realised the meaning of open source it was renamed to anabolism().
-- Richard Ross-Langley
:laugh:
Software Zen:
delete this; -
I've never cursed in my executable code, but I have in comments a number of times.
Software Zen:
delete this;Gary Wheeler wrote:
I've never cursed in my executable code
Not even a
wtfvariable?Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
-
So I think the guy before me wanted to spell the word 'Assigned' in his C# method name but ended up saying
public int UpdateReasonNotAssgiggedFlag(IEnumerable downtimes)
{
// ...
}Excuse the profanity, but I wonder what it feels like to get "ass-gigged." Anyway, I corrected the "misspelling..."
Sincerely Yours, Brian Hart
Probably it had to deal with legacy undocumented code... :)
CEO at: - Rafaga Systems - Para Facturas - Modern Components for the moment...
-
I didn't even see it the first time. If you hadn't metioned I might not have noticed. However, now that I do, it is quite funny!
Its amazing how the human brain fills in what we think it should be when reading - I missed it the first time also.
-
Gary Wheeler wrote:
I've never cursed in my executable code
Not even a
wtfvariable?Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
It is safe to use profanity in a variable name, as long as it won’t ever be seen by someone who would find it objectionable. However, it is never safe to put any questionable content into a display string. Even though you have every intention of deleting the bad words, they can still make it into production. :sigh:
Just because the code works, it doesn't mean that it is good code.
-
So I think the guy before me wanted to spell the word 'Assigned' in his C# method name but ended up saying
public int UpdateReasonNotAssgiggedFlag(IEnumerable downtimes)
{
// ...
}Excuse the profanity, but I wonder what it feels like to get "ass-gigged." Anyway, I corrected the "misspelling..."
Sincerely Yours, Brian Hart
Although I have mentioned it before in another posting, I have seen the word "FUKU" used as a protocol identifier.
-
Gary Wheeler wrote:
I've never cursed in my executable code
Not even a
wtfvariable?Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
-
I use WTF functions all the time in debugging... WTF = WriteToFile(...) I get a kick out of it when someone sees it :) but it is a valid acronym
Sure sure.. thats what you claimed after your file writing abstraction finally was working and went straight to production ;)
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
