Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Government involved in protest marches

Government involved in protest marches

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
question
14 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    Paul Watson
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Today the ANC, the majority party in SA, has organised a rally/protest/march/toy-toy outside the US consulate against Bush's Go To War policy. Now the major opposition party has come out saying that the government should not get involved in organising rallies and protest marches. At first blush I agreed. Then I started thinking and have now changed my mind. Surely the majority party represents the majority of the people (please remember: We are talking ideals here. How it should be, not how it is) and so is perfectly right in being allowed to organise a march like this? Also this march just reinforces the official stance of South Africa towards the war. If nobody attends the rally, then we can see that the majority parties views on the matter do not represent the people. If it is attended well then they are. What is wrong with it? * This is not a war post, m'kay? Don't yell at me because SA is against the war.

    Paul Watson
    Bluegrass
    Cape Town, South Africa

    Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

    L K A R M 7 Replies Last reply
    0
    • P Paul Watson

      Today the ANC, the majority party in SA, has organised a rally/protest/march/toy-toy outside the US consulate against Bush's Go To War policy. Now the major opposition party has come out saying that the government should not get involved in organising rallies and protest marches. At first blush I agreed. Then I started thinking and have now changed my mind. Surely the majority party represents the majority of the people (please remember: We are talking ideals here. How it should be, not how it is) and so is perfectly right in being allowed to organise a march like this? Also this march just reinforces the official stance of South Africa towards the war. If nobody attends the rally, then we can see that the majority parties views on the matter do not represent the people. If it is attended well then they are. What is wrong with it? * This is not a war post, m'kay? Don't yell at me because SA is against the war.

      Paul Watson
      Bluegrass
      Cape Town, South Africa

      Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      You could call it democracy in action..... The tigress is here :-D

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P Paul Watson

        Today the ANC, the majority party in SA, has organised a rally/protest/march/toy-toy outside the US consulate against Bush's Go To War policy. Now the major opposition party has come out saying that the government should not get involved in organising rallies and protest marches. At first blush I agreed. Then I started thinking and have now changed my mind. Surely the majority party represents the majority of the people (please remember: We are talking ideals here. How it should be, not how it is) and so is perfectly right in being allowed to organise a march like this? Also this march just reinforces the official stance of South Africa towards the war. If nobody attends the rally, then we can see that the majority parties views on the matter do not represent the people. If it is attended well then they are. What is wrong with it? * This is not a war post, m'kay? Don't yell at me because SA is against the war.

        Paul Watson
        Bluegrass
        Cape Town, South Africa

        Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

        K Offline
        K Offline
        KaRl
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Paul Watson wrote: the government should not get involved in organising rallies and protest marches. :wtf: why not ? Paul Watson wrote: What is wrong with it? Nothing IMO.


        Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Paul Watson

          Today the ANC, the majority party in SA, has organised a rally/protest/march/toy-toy outside the US consulate against Bush's Go To War policy. Now the major opposition party has come out saying that the government should not get involved in organising rallies and protest marches. At first blush I agreed. Then I started thinking and have now changed my mind. Surely the majority party represents the majority of the people (please remember: We are talking ideals here. How it should be, not how it is) and so is perfectly right in being allowed to organise a march like this? Also this march just reinforces the official stance of South Africa towards the war. If nobody attends the rally, then we can see that the majority parties views on the matter do not represent the people. If it is attended well then they are. What is wrong with it? * This is not a war post, m'kay? Don't yell at me because SA is against the war.

          Paul Watson
          Bluegrass
          Cape Town, South Africa

          Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

          A Offline
          A Offline
          Anna Jayne Metcalfe
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Paul Watson wrote: Today the ANC, the majority party in SA, has organised a rally/protest/march/toy-toy outside the US consulate against Bush's Go To War policy. That's novel. Heck, why not? Can you imagine if that happened in the UK? I can just see the headlines "Government organises Protest against rising Taxes". Hang on a sec... :laugh: On second thoughts, it'll probably never happen here. We're just too apathetic in this country. :rolleyes: Anna :rose: www.annasplace.me.uk

          "Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
          - Marcia Graesch

          Trouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++

          D 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Paul Watson

            Today the ANC, the majority party in SA, has organised a rally/protest/march/toy-toy outside the US consulate against Bush's Go To War policy. Now the major opposition party has come out saying that the government should not get involved in organising rallies and protest marches. At first blush I agreed. Then I started thinking and have now changed my mind. Surely the majority party represents the majority of the people (please remember: We are talking ideals here. How it should be, not how it is) and so is perfectly right in being allowed to organise a march like this? Also this march just reinforces the official stance of South Africa towards the war. If nobody attends the rally, then we can see that the majority parties views on the matter do not represent the people. If it is attended well then they are. What is wrong with it? * This is not a war post, m'kay? Don't yell at me because SA is against the war.

            Paul Watson
            Bluegrass
            Cape Town, South Africa

            Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

            R Offline
            R Offline
            Rohit Sinha
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Also remember that the government did not participate in the rally, technically. The members of the party currently running the government did. People often fail to distinguish between the government and the party running it. If tomorrow the government changes, ANC will still protest the war. But the stance of the government may change depending on the new party in power now. The people who rallied also have a right to their opinions, and the right to rally and protest, so what if they are currently in office? They are a political party, and citizens of the country, so have the same rights as everyone else. If the government wants to protest, it can write letters, issue memos, take official stances, and so forth. But a government can't rally. LOL! What am I saying? Does that make sense even to me? Guess I'm too messed up in the head right now.
            Regards,

            Rohit Sinha

            Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
            - Abraham Lincoln

            The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
            - Anonymous

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Paul Watson

              Today the ANC, the majority party in SA, has organised a rally/protest/march/toy-toy outside the US consulate against Bush's Go To War policy. Now the major opposition party has come out saying that the government should not get involved in organising rallies and protest marches. At first blush I agreed. Then I started thinking and have now changed my mind. Surely the majority party represents the majority of the people (please remember: We are talking ideals here. How it should be, not how it is) and so is perfectly right in being allowed to organise a march like this? Also this march just reinforces the official stance of South Africa towards the war. If nobody attends the rally, then we can see that the majority parties views on the matter do not represent the people. If it is attended well then they are. What is wrong with it? * This is not a war post, m'kay? Don't yell at me because SA is against the war.

              Paul Watson
              Bluegrass
              Cape Town, South Africa

              Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Megan Forbes
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Paul Watson wrote: toy-toy :) Seriously, it's nice to see them standing up for what they believe in against someone so much bigger than us. Any links? Perhaps we could organise a simultaneous one here, outside SA House in Trafalgar Sq :cool:


              A pack of geeks, pale and skinny, feeling a bit pumped and macho after a morning of strenuous mouse clicking and dragging, arriving en masse at the gym. They carefully reset the machines to the lowest settings, offer to spot for each other on the 5 lb dumbells, and rediscover the art of macrame while attempting to jump rope. -Roger Wright on my colleagues and I going to gym each day at lunch

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Paul Watson

                Today the ANC, the majority party in SA, has organised a rally/protest/march/toy-toy outside the US consulate against Bush's Go To War policy. Now the major opposition party has come out saying that the government should not get involved in organising rallies and protest marches. At first blush I agreed. Then I started thinking and have now changed my mind. Surely the majority party represents the majority of the people (please remember: We are talking ideals here. How it should be, not how it is) and so is perfectly right in being allowed to organise a march like this? Also this march just reinforces the official stance of South Africa towards the war. If nobody attends the rally, then we can see that the majority parties views on the matter do not represent the people. If it is attended well then they are. What is wrong with it? * This is not a war post, m'kay? Don't yell at me because SA is against the war.

                Paul Watson
                Bluegrass
                Cape Town, South Africa

                Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jason Henderson
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Kind of reminds me of a George Orwell story I read once.

                Jason Henderson
                "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

                articles profile

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jason Henderson

                  Kind of reminds me of a George Orwell story I read once.

                  Jason Henderson
                  "You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Gandhi

                  articles profile

                  P Offline
                  P Offline
                  Paul Watson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Jason Henderson wrote: Kind of reminds me of a George Orwell story I read once. In other words: This is not a good thing. :) thanks for the reply.

                  Paul Watson
                  Bluegrass
                  Cape Town, South Africa

                  Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Anna Jayne Metcalfe

                    Paul Watson wrote: Today the ANC, the majority party in SA, has organised a rally/protest/march/toy-toy outside the US consulate against Bush's Go To War policy. That's novel. Heck, why not? Can you imagine if that happened in the UK? I can just see the headlines "Government organises Protest against rising Taxes". Hang on a sec... :laugh: On second thoughts, it'll probably never happen here. We're just too apathetic in this country. :rolleyes: Anna :rose: www.annasplace.me.uk

                    "Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
                    - Marcia Graesch

                    Trouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    Dy
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote: We're just too apathetic in this country Hang on a sec Anna, I'd contest that. I was at the last don't-attack-Iraq demo, and there were over 200,000 people there, hardly apathey (sp?). I'll be at the next one on the 15th too, and we're looking forward to a (hopefully) huge turn out, despite the UK weather in Febuary. I don't think it's true that us brits are apathetic, okay, it's a little easier for me because I live in London, but I would still get there if I lived in the Shetland Isles! Does this mean we won't be seeing you there? (Hint, hint)


                    Dylan
                    Boycott Bush
                    Punch GWB

                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Dy

                      Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote: We're just too apathetic in this country Hang on a sec Anna, I'd contest that. I was at the last don't-attack-Iraq demo, and there were over 200,000 people there, hardly apathey (sp?). I'll be at the next one on the 15th too, and we're looking forward to a (hopefully) huge turn out, despite the UK weather in Febuary. I don't think it's true that us brits are apathetic, okay, it's a little easier for me because I live in London, but I would still get there if I lived in the Shetland Isles! Does this mean we won't be seeing you there? (Hint, hint)


                      Dylan
                      Boycott Bush
                      Punch GWB

                      A Offline
                      A Offline
                      Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Fair cop guvnor. :rolleyes: Whilst I know we are capable of getting off our bums and doing something, I think it takes a lot more to get us to do so than the population of many countries. Let's face it, when the British population do a demo, it usually means they're seriously pissed about something! Anna :rose: www.annasplace.me.uk

                      "Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
                      - Marcia Graesch

                      Trouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P Paul Watson

                        Today the ANC, the majority party in SA, has organised a rally/protest/march/toy-toy outside the US consulate against Bush's Go To War policy. Now the major opposition party has come out saying that the government should not get involved in organising rallies and protest marches. At first blush I agreed. Then I started thinking and have now changed my mind. Surely the majority party represents the majority of the people (please remember: We are talking ideals here. How it should be, not how it is) and so is perfectly right in being allowed to organise a march like this? Also this march just reinforces the official stance of South Africa towards the war. If nobody attends the rally, then we can see that the majority parties views on the matter do not represent the people. If it is attended well then they are. What is wrong with it? * This is not a war post, m'kay? Don't yell at me because SA is against the war.

                        Paul Watson
                        Bluegrass
                        Cape Town, South Africa

                        Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Just out of curiosity: If the current US/UK threats against Iraq somehow manage to disarm Saddam without war will the anti-war protestors give us any credit at all? My guess is no. Instead they'll claim victory "See, we didn't need to go to war!" while ignoring the power/pressure of the threat of war. In the end we are in a "no win" situation. Mike Mullikin :beer:

                        Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps. - Emo Philips

                        A R P 3 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Just out of curiosity: If the current US/UK threats against Iraq somehow manage to disarm Saddam without war will the anti-war protestors give us any credit at all? My guess is no. Instead they'll claim victory "See, we didn't need to go to war!" while ignoring the power/pressure of the threat of war. In the end we are in a "no win" situation. Mike Mullikin :beer:

                          Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps. - Emo Philips

                          A Offline
                          A Offline
                          Anna Jayne Metcalfe
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Somehow I doubt it Mike. :confused: Some people never want to give any credit to anyone but themselves. Anna :rose: www.annasplace.me.uk

                          "Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
                          - Marcia Graesch

                          Trouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            Just out of curiosity: If the current US/UK threats against Iraq somehow manage to disarm Saddam without war will the anti-war protestors give us any credit at all? My guess is no. Instead they'll claim victory "See, we didn't need to go to war!" while ignoring the power/pressure of the threat of war. In the end we are in a "no win" situation. Mike Mullikin :beer:

                            Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps. - Emo Philips

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Rohit Sinha
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Mike Mullikin wrote: If the current US/UK threats against Iraq somehow manage to disarm Saddam without war will the anti-war protestors give us any credit at all? Many, if not all of them will, I believe. I myself am personally against a war, but then I am against any war, but let that be, that's just me. But if Iraq is disarmed, I realise fully well that it'll only be because of the war threat. And kudos to US/UK. Some things cannot simply be achieved without some arm twisting.
                            Regards,

                            Rohit Sinha

                            Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
                            - Abraham Lincoln

                            The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
                            - Anonymous

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              Just out of curiosity: If the current US/UK threats against Iraq somehow manage to disarm Saddam without war will the anti-war protestors give us any credit at all? My guess is no. Instead they'll claim victory "See, we didn't need to go to war!" while ignoring the power/pressure of the threat of war. In the end we are in a "no win" situation. Mike Mullikin :beer:

                              Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps. - Emo Philips

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              Paul Watson
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              Mike Mullikin wrote: If the current US/UK threats against Iraq somehow manage to disarm Saddam without war will the anti-war protestors give us any credit at all? No, you are right most won't. Hopefully though we can progress towards not even needing to threaten people. War is an ugly stick to use.

                              Paul Watson
                              Bluegrass
                              Cape Town, South Africa

                              Roger Wright wrote: Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups