Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Weird and The Wonderful
  4. Now this is embarassing

Now this is embarassing

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Weird and The Wonderful
45 Posts 26 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Manfred Rudolf Bihy

    Nothing against them except perchance in, humm, let's say orally challenging situations. ;P

    "I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"

    Ron White, Comedian

    E Offline
    E Offline
    enhzflep
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    What a catch!

    Make it work. Then do it better - Andrei Straut

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G Gary Wheeler

      if (_Uptime != null)
      {
      _Uptime.Remove(TraCommon.Tokens.TraService_Speed);
      }
      {
      _Uptime = new Service.Message();
      _Uptime.Code = SysCommon.CommandCode.SysUptimeEvt;
      }

      I just found this in my code. It's been there for years.

      Software Zen: delete this;

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Shao Voon Wong
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      Add this comment before anyone notice your code!

      // This embarrassing code is definitely not written by Gary Wheeler!
      if (_Uptime != null)
      {
      _Uptime.Remove(TraCommon.Tokens.TraService_Speed);
      }
      {
      _Uptime = new Service.Message();
      _Uptime.Code = SysCommon.CommandCode.SysUptimeEvt;
      }

      :laugh:

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Shao Voon Wong

        Add this comment before anyone notice your code!

        // This embarrassing code is definitely not written by Gary Wheeler!
        if (_Uptime != null)
        {
        _Uptime.Remove(TraCommon.Tokens.TraService_Speed);
        }
        {
        _Uptime = new Service.Message();
        _Uptime.Code = SysCommon.CommandCode.SysUptimeEvt;
        }

        :laugh:

        B Offline
        B Offline
        BobJanova
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        Sadly, SVN will tell you that it really is ;(

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G Gary Wheeler

          if (_Uptime != null)
          {
          _Uptime.Remove(TraCommon.Tokens.TraService_Speed);
          }
          {
          _Uptime = new Service.Message();
          _Uptime.Code = SysCommon.CommandCode.SysUptimeEvt;
          }

          I just found this in my code. It's been there for years.

          Software Zen: delete this;

          V Offline
          V Offline
          V 0
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          Don't be too embarassed. It's quite normal[^]

          V.
          (MQOTD Rules and previous Solutions )

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G Gary Wheeler

            if (_Uptime != null)
            {
            _Uptime.Remove(TraCommon.Tokens.TraService_Speed);
            }
            {
            _Uptime = new Service.Message();
            _Uptime.Code = SysCommon.CommandCode.SysUptimeEvt;
            }

            I just found this in my code. It's been there for years.

            Software Zen: delete this;

            U Offline
            U Offline
            User 7894920
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            At the risk of starting a slashdot-style flame war I refuse to code an if without:

            if (condition) {
            consequence;
            } else {
            negative consequence;
            }

            Can't help it. Can't change it. 56 years old and too old to recover from it. But also pretty hard to miss an 'else'. Please don't hate me...

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • U User 7894920

              At the risk of starting a slashdot-style flame war I refuse to code an if without:

              if (condition) {
              consequence;
              } else {
              negative consequence;
              }

              Can't help it. Can't change it. 56 years old and too old to recover from it. But also pretty hard to miss an 'else'. Please don't hate me...

              G Offline
              G Offline
              Gary Wheeler
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              Part of my problem is that, due to changes in style guidelines in my group over time, I have a body of older code that uses K&R braces. My newer stuff, including the aforementioned C#, uses the brace-per-line style.

              Software Zen: delete this;

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G Gary Wheeler

                if (_Uptime != null)
                {
                _Uptime.Remove(TraCommon.Tokens.TraService_Speed);
                }
                {
                _Uptime = new Service.Message();
                _Uptime.Code = SysCommon.CommandCode.SysUptimeEvt;
                }

                I just found this in my code. It's been there for years.

                Software Zen: delete this;

                F Offline
                F Offline
                Fabio Franco
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                Gary Wheeler wrote:

                It's been there for years.

                Then it has been working for years too! Don't fix it!

                To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson ---- Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia

                G 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G Gary Wheeler

                  This[^] one? 'Tis quite similar. Mine was a sin of omission, while his was a sin of emission.

                  Software Zen: delete this;

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  KP Lee
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  Gary Wheeler wrote:

                  Mine was a sin of omission, while his was a sin of emission.

                  Someone mentioned in the other link that an empty statement shouldn't be allowed after an if statement. I think both should be allowed, but have warning messages. His would be "The conditional statement won't execute anything", yours "Extra brackets added for no apparent reason". Both may be a stretch for the compiler to see. On the other hand, people who like padded coding might not like that.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G Gary Wheeler

                    This[^] one? 'Tis quite similar. Mine was a sin of omission, while his was a sin of emission.

                    Software Zen: delete this;

                    K Offline
                    K Offline
                    KP Lee
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    Thought I said "The conditional (if-else) statement won't execute anything" but I used the special characters (@lt; @or; >) that hid it and didn't look at my preview. Great, only gt works as substitution letters.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G Gary Wheeler

                      if (_Uptime != null)
                      {
                      _Uptime.Remove(TraCommon.Tokens.TraService_Speed);
                      }
                      {
                      _Uptime = new Service.Message();
                      _Uptime.Code = SysCommon.CommandCode.SysUptimeEvt;
                      }

                      I just found this in my code. It's been there for years.

                      Software Zen: delete this;

                      U Offline
                      U Offline
                      User 3138470
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      This reminds me why i hate ppl who write code like if (x != y) doThis(); remember one time when somebody added some code --> if (x != y) doThis(); alsoDoThat(); Took a while in debugger to figure out what was reason :-p Cause not part of my code :-) I always write my code after that if (x != y) { doThis(); } Even if have to do only one thing :-p

                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N NormDroid

                        missing else? Don't you just love scoping braces.

                        Software Kinetics - Dependable Software news

                        A Offline
                        A Offline
                        Adriaan Davel
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        I did this once in c++, took very long to figure out:

                        if (condition);
                        {

                        }

                        ____________________________________________________________ Be brave little warrior, be VERY brave

                        G F 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • G Gary Wheeler

                          if (_Uptime != null)
                          {
                          _Uptime.Remove(TraCommon.Tokens.TraService_Speed);
                          }
                          {
                          _Uptime = new Service.Message();
                          _Uptime.Code = SysCommon.CommandCode.SysUptimeEvt;
                          }

                          I just found this in my code. It's been there for years.

                          Software Zen: delete this;

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Michael Kingsford Gray
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #25

                          Would have been obvious in VB.NET.

                          A G 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • M Michael Kingsford Gray

                            Would have been obvious in VB.NET.

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            AspDotNetDev
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #26

                            Every line of code in VB.Net is obviously a mistake. ;P

                            Thou mewling ill-breeding pignut!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Adriaan Davel

                              I did this once in c++, took very long to figure out:

                              if (condition);
                              {

                              }

                              ____________________________________________________________ Be brave little warrior, be VERY brave

                              G Offline
                              G Offline
                              greldak
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #27

                              I'd be more concerned if there was something between the braces to get unexpectedly executed irrespective of the intended condition.

                              A 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • G greldak

                                I'd be more concerned if there was something between the braces to get unexpectedly executed irrespective of the intended condition.

                                A Offline
                                A Offline
                                Adriaan Davel
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #28

                                That's exactly what happened, irrespective of the condition the code block always executed...

                                ____________________________________________________________ Be brave little warrior, be VERY brave

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Adriaan Davel

                                  I did this once in c++, took very long to figure out:

                                  if (condition);
                                  {

                                  }

                                  ____________________________________________________________ Be brave little warrior, be VERY brave

                                  F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  Frans_55129
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #29

                                  And I did this once in C, also took me long to figure it out: for (i=0; i <= ....; i ++); { }

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • B BobJanova

                                    Sadly, SVN will tell you that it really is ;(

                                    G Offline
                                    G Offline
                                    Gary R Wheeler
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #30

                                    Embarassing2A: We use SourceSafe. Embarassing2B: It would still tell you that it really is.

                                    Software Zen: delete this;

                                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U User 3138470

                                      This reminds me why i hate ppl who write code like if (x != y) doThis(); remember one time when somebody added some code --> if (x != y) doThis(); alsoDoThat(); Took a while in debugger to figure out what was reason :-p Cause not part of my code :-) I always write my code after that if (x != y) { doThis(); } Even if have to do only one thing :-p

                                      G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      Gary R Wheeler
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #31

                                      That's usually the case for me as well.

                                      Software Zen: delete this;

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • F Fabio Franco

                                        Gary Wheeler wrote:

                                        It's been there for years.

                                        Then it has been working for years too! Don't fix it!

                                        To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson ---- Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia

                                        G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        Gary R Wheeler
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #32

                                        Actually, it's not. In the code you don't see, it ends up replacing existing information when it should be adding it. The existing information gets lost.

                                        Software Zen: delete this;

                                        F 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G Gary R Wheeler

                                          Actually, it's not. In the code you don't see, it ends up replacing existing information when it should be adding it. The existing information gets lost.

                                          Software Zen: delete this;

                                          F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          Fabio Franco
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #33

                                          I did notice that. What I meant is that the application was obviously working for years with that code, unless it's been abandoned. If it was behaving incorrectly it would've been noticed before. I'm not saying that what the code was doing was correct, just that the application was behaving as expected.

                                          To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems - Homer Simpson ---- Our heads are round so our thoughts can change direction - Francis Picabia

                                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups