Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Ahhhrgghhhhhh! Naming Conventions That Suck

Ahhhrgghhhhhh! Naming Conventions That Suck

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
30 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G grralph1

    Thanks Mark for the clarification. One would think that, someone with my intelligence, would have realised this immediately. I misread it and my brain mispronouced it and I got excited about a new word. I do like fusion words though. Your clarification has cleared the whole issue. ...and made me feel a bit dumb Thanks

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Brady Kelly
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Guys, there is a proper name for 'fusion words'. Ginormous is a portmanteau.

    M G 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • J jim lahey

      We've got people who insist on prefixing everything with the first letter of the company we work for, "so that we know what is ours and what isn't". Namespaces are not enough it seems.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Mark_Wallace
      wrote on last edited by
      #21

      Take advantage of it, e.g. if your company name starts with "W", use a lot of anchors.

      I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Brady Kelly

        Guys, there is a proper name for 'fusion words'. Ginormous is a portmanteau.

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Mark_Wallace
        wrote on last edited by
        #22

        <Turns up nose> Oh, you are so out of vogue... <Restores nose to its original shape>

        I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Mark_Wallace

          <Turns up nose> Oh, you are so out of vogue... <Restores nose to its original shape>

          I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

          B Offline
          B Offline
          Brady Kelly
          wrote on last edited by
          #23

          I know. Grumpy old man I am.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Rage

            This is brilliant on many levels.

            ~RaGE();

            I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Mark_Wallace
            wrote on last edited by
            #24

            It has to be, because when you chop a bit off one leg, it still wobbles, so you have to chop an bit off the other, but it'll still wobble, so you have to... etc.

            I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Mark_Wallace

              Take advantage of it, e.g. if your company name starts with "W", use a lot of anchors.

              I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

              J Offline
              J Offline
              jim lahey
              wrote on last edited by
              #25

              Unfortunately it doesn't, otherwise it's a genius idea. It's as good as the vandalised road sign in Tamworth that points to Ankerside. I think you know the rest. I'm trying to keep my ranting as anonymous as possible so unfortunately I can't tell you some of the odd and amusing things this naming convention has created, there are a few. Attempting to reason with this mentality is akin to trying to kick water up hill. I can get my revenge in other ways though. The same people who like to pointlessly prefix stuff are also allergic to anything development-related that is more recent than 1995. We've already integrated Dependency Injection, MVC, WCF, NHibernate, Moq and AOP into a couple of projects and these are the topics I use for my tech talk sessions so they are just going to have to sit there quietly for an hour at a time and listen to me talk about stuff they refuse to understand.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B Brady Kelly

                Guys, there is a proper name for 'fusion words'. Ginormous is a portmanteau.

                G Offline
                G Offline
                grralph1
                wrote on last edited by
                #26

                Excellent Brad I remember hearing this word before and now you have brought it back… Portmanteau That’s 3 things that I have learnt today Thanks

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Abhinav S

                  SockPuppeteer wrote:

                  Ahhhrgghhhhhh

                  That sounds like a good variable name.

                  WP7.5 Apps - XKCD | Calvin | SMBC | Sound Meter | Speed Dial

                  Richard DeemingR Offline
                  Richard DeemingR Offline
                  Richard Deeming
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #27

                  Is that the castle of Ahhhrgghhhhhh[^]? ;P


                  "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                  "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Mark_Wallace

                    It's a "fusion" (since that's the in word) of gigantic and enormous, and therefore a calculated and appropriate use of poor English for this thread, innit?

                    I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    jsc42
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    Mark Wallace wrote:

                    poor English

                    My standard reference of what is valid English (The Oxford Compact English Dictionary [1996 hard back edition]) has an entry for "ginormous" but marks it as adj. Brit. slang. So it is OK for use in ordinary parlance but not acceptable for Scrabble (although, I understand that in recent years the 'accepatbility' criteria for Scrabble has been relaxed); but using 'OK' is not acceptable as it is a mangled abbreviation.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S SockPuppeteer

                      We have a txt naming dev here at the coalface. So I am plagued with method names like AddChild2Parent and KeepUp2Date Jeez! it's one flaming character you're saving yourself! it drives me 2 distraction!

                      .\\axxx

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Rob Grainger
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      Ah yes, that along with B2B applications - obviously the work of a text kid. Get over it.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Mark_Wallace

                        It's a "fusion" (since that's the in word) of gigantic and enormous, and therefore a calculated and appropriate use of poor English for this thread, innit?

                        I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                        H Offline
                        H Offline
                        H Brydon
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        Mark Wallace wrote:

                        It's a "fusion" (since that's the in word) of gigantic and enormous, and therefore a calculated and appropriate use of poor English for this thread, innit?

                        Absatively. That kind of usage is posilutely underwhelming.

                        -- Harvey

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups