Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. They Ain't Gonna Fix It

They Ain't Gonna Fix It

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helplounge
44 Posts 17 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • W wizardzz

    When SocSec checks bounce, time to bug out.

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Mike Hankey
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    And I got a felling that ain't to far off.

    VS2010/Atmel Studio 6.0 ToDo Manager Extension
    Version 3.0 now available. There is no place like 127.0.0.1

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • W wizardzz

      I agree with you here. $240bn? We went through 10% of that the day after Thanksgiving. http://rt.com/usa/news/day-thanksgiving-debt-us-741/[^] From my understanding, isn't a disproportionate amount of the budget dedicate to defense spending? Wouldn't pulling out of countries that only Israel wants us in save quite a bit?

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #23

      wizardzz wrote:

      Wouldn't pulling out of countries that only Israel wants us in save quite a bit?

      If Israel were guiding our foreign policy that would be a relief. At least someone would be at the helm. I'm a bit of an isolationist - I see no reason to have our military anywhere but within our own territories: The 50 states, Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Canada.

      C W 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • C Colin Mullikin

        wizardzz wrote:

        From my understanding, isn't a disproportionate amount of the budget dedicate to defense spending? Wouldn't pulling out of countries that only Israel wants us in save quite a bit?

        That has always been my opinion as well. We feel like we have this moral duty to police the whole world for fear of "the dirty Communists" taking over. The Cold War ended 20 years ago. Someone needs to tell the DoD...

        The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin

        W Offline
        W Offline
        wizardzz
        wrote on last edited by
        #24

        I have no problem spending money to defend our country on our soil and our allies soil (missile defense, early warning, subs that provide MAD), but defending Israel from every big bad neighbor is not a moral duty our soldiers and tax payers have.

        L C 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • C Colin Mullikin

          Is that what they were talking about in 'The Lion King' with the whole "Circle of Life" thing...? :doh:

          The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #25

          Colin Mullikin wrote:

          "Circle of Life" thing...?

          ..or circling the drain, whatever.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            wizardzz wrote:

            Wouldn't pulling out of countries that only Israel wants us in save quite a bit?

            If Israel were guiding our foreign policy that would be a relief. At least someone would be at the helm. I'm a bit of an isolationist - I see no reason to have our military anywhere but within our own territories: The 50 states, Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Canada.

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Colin Mullikin
            wrote on last edited by
            #26

            MehGerbil wrote:

            Canada

            :thumbsup: :laugh:

            The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              wizardzz wrote:

              Wouldn't pulling out of countries that only Israel wants us in save quite a bit?

              If Israel were guiding our foreign policy that would be a relief. At least someone would be at the helm. I'm a bit of an isolationist - I see no reason to have our military anywhere but within our own territories: The 50 states, Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Canada.

              W Offline
              W Offline
              wizardzz
              wrote on last edited by
              #27

              MehGerbil wrote:

              At least someone would be at the helm.

              Pffft, don't say that, the UN might get some ideas.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • W wizardzz

                I have no problem spending money to defend our country on our soil and our allies soil (missile defense, early warning, subs that provide MAD), but defending Israel from every big bad neighbor is not a moral duty our soldiers and tax payers have.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #28

                I'm gonna take a shot in the dark and guess the reason we defend Israel is so that they don't, because quite frankly, I think they'd use the nuclear option since they don't have the man power for a ground war. Our current way of doing it is giving Arabs a break, I think. It's still stupid.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • W wizardzz

                  I have no problem spending money to defend our country on our soil and our allies soil (missile defense, early warning, subs that provide MAD), but defending Israel from every big bad neighbor is not a moral duty our soldiers and tax payers have.

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Colin Mullikin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #29

                  wizardzz wrote:

                  and our allies soil

                  That's the problem. We spend more money defending our allies than they spend defending themselves...

                  The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin

                  W C 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • C Colin Mullikin

                    I think the point he was making is that "Technocrats" will debate things into the ground more than the current politicians do...

                    The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Andrew Rissing
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #30

                    Yes, but at least us (aka those that read CodeProject) would be the ones in power. :D

                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Colin Mullikin

                      wizardzz wrote:

                      and our allies soil

                      That's the problem. We spend more money defending our allies than they spend defending themselves...

                      The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin

                      W Offline
                      W Offline
                      wizardzz
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #31

                      Aside from my bad previous grammar, yes, totally correct. Quite sad actually. The military industrial complex is alive and well. Thank you for the warning Mr. Eisenhower, unfortunately, nobody heeded it.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Andrew Rissing

                        Yes, but at least us (aka those that read CodeProject) would be the ones in power. :D

                        C Offline
                        C Offline
                        CafedeJamaica
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #32

                        Call me when the melle starts, I'll be sharpening my axe until

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          I was listening to the radio this morning and the conversation was about the coming tax increases here in America. Evidently President Obama wants to raise the tax on dividends from 15% to 20%. The analyst said this would raise 240 billion dollars over the next decade. That is when it hit me: They ain't gonna fix it. Set aside the partisanship for a moment. Set aside your views on taxes (or lack thereof) for a moment. Set aside the whole conservative/liberal thing for a moment. The 240 billion over 10 years is a drop in the bucket. We've been running 1000 billion per year in deficits alone - so that huge, earth shattering tax hike would only cover the deficit for 3 months of out the 120 months total. We're at about 2.5% of the deficit - not even regular spending. We've the same problem on the other side of the aisle. If you completely cut all social spending - if you managed to realize the totality of some conservatives wildest dream - you'd still be running deficits that Obamas wildest tax increases wouldn't cover. In short, I think you could give Obama carte blanche to raise taxes and give the other side carte blanche to cut spending and I still think we'd crater this thing. People keep talking about cutting this or raising that and then they throw around these figures that represent only the smallest fraction of the overall problem. We really have reached the "rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic" phase.

                          W Offline
                          W Offline
                          Wjousts
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #33

                          The economy tanking is what made the hole so deep and only the economy growing again will get us out. This is why all the gnashing off teeth over the deceit is silly. We should do whatever it takes to grow the economy (e.g. capital spending) and we can grow out of it.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Andrew Rissing

                            Is this a page out of the EU's guidebook on how to run a country? :D

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            Corporal Agarn
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #34

                            You beat me to the punch (line).

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Lost User

                              I think the democracy experiment is teaching us that the mob can be just as oppressive and irresponsible as a monarch. Anyone have any ideas as to what we should try next?

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              charlieg
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #35

                              It's called a Republic based on the rule of law. What we have now is a democracy degrading into feudalism. Choose your Duke wisely. But, you are correct, they are not going to fix it. Every nation, and I mean EVERY nation, when they get to this point they just default. I wonder how much money China still has in US treasury notes.

                              Charlie Gilley You're going to tell me what I want to know, or I'm going to beat you to death in your own house. "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759

                              K 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • C Colin Mullikin

                                wizardzz wrote:

                                and our allies soil

                                That's the problem. We spend more money defending our allies than they spend defending themselves...

                                The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                charlieg
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #36

                                amen to that

                                Charlie Gilley You're going to tell me what I want to know, or I'm going to beat you to death in your own house. "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Mike Hankey

                                  Wasn't his biggest argument against Romney, "The math just doesn't add up"? [rant] He's taken us to the fiscal cliff now throw us off and let the revolution begin. [/rant]

                                  VS2010/Atmel Studio 6.0 ToDo Manager Extension
                                  Version 3.0 now available. There is no place like 127.0.0.1

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mark H2
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #37

                                  By "He" I assume you mean Obama. How is it his fault? Pretty much everyone post Eisenhower has run the US ecomomy in deficit, both Democrat & Republican...

                                  If your neighbours don't listen to The Ramones, turn it up real loud so they can.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L Lost User

                                    I was listening to the radio this morning and the conversation was about the coming tax increases here in America. Evidently President Obama wants to raise the tax on dividends from 15% to 20%. The analyst said this would raise 240 billion dollars over the next decade. That is when it hit me: They ain't gonna fix it. Set aside the partisanship for a moment. Set aside your views on taxes (or lack thereof) for a moment. Set aside the whole conservative/liberal thing for a moment. The 240 billion over 10 years is a drop in the bucket. We've been running 1000 billion per year in deficits alone - so that huge, earth shattering tax hike would only cover the deficit for 3 months of out the 120 months total. We're at about 2.5% of the deficit - not even regular spending. We've the same problem on the other side of the aisle. If you completely cut all social spending - if you managed to realize the totality of some conservatives wildest dream - you'd still be running deficits that Obamas wildest tax increases wouldn't cover. In short, I think you could give Obama carte blanche to raise taxes and give the other side carte blanche to cut spending and I still think we'd crater this thing. People keep talking about cutting this or raising that and then they throw around these figures that represent only the smallest fraction of the overall problem. We really have reached the "rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic" phase.

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Sasha Laurel
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #38

                                    Maybe we should start learning to speak chinese?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L Lost User

                                      I was listening to the radio this morning and the conversation was about the coming tax increases here in America. Evidently President Obama wants to raise the tax on dividends from 15% to 20%. The analyst said this would raise 240 billion dollars over the next decade. That is when it hit me: They ain't gonna fix it. Set aside the partisanship for a moment. Set aside your views on taxes (or lack thereof) for a moment. Set aside the whole conservative/liberal thing for a moment. The 240 billion over 10 years is a drop in the bucket. We've been running 1000 billion per year in deficits alone - so that huge, earth shattering tax hike would only cover the deficit for 3 months of out the 120 months total. We're at about 2.5% of the deficit - not even regular spending. We've the same problem on the other side of the aisle. If you completely cut all social spending - if you managed to realize the totality of some conservatives wildest dream - you'd still be running deficits that Obamas wildest tax increases wouldn't cover. In short, I think you could give Obama carte blanche to raise taxes and give the other side carte blanche to cut spending and I still think we'd crater this thing. People keep talking about cutting this or raising that and then they throw around these figures that represent only the smallest fraction of the overall problem. We really have reached the "rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic" phase.

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Lost User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #39

                                      MehGerbil wrote:

                                      We've been running 1000 billion per year in deficits alone

                                      How much more till it's a Trillion?

                                      Michael Martin Australia "I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • D Dalek Dave

                                        You need to kill the unemployed and then fire nearly all those on a public payroll. Tax all earnings over $500,000 pa at 99% and all the rest at 50%. Corporation Tax to 75% and Sales Tax to 30%. Then, before announcing it, buy shares in a Gun Company.

                                        --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]

                                        K Offline
                                        K Offline
                                        KP Lee
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #40

                                        Dalek Dave wrote:

                                        You need to kill the unemployed and then fire nearly all those on a public payroll.

                                        You got the order wrong. Talk about killing two birds...

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C charlieg

                                          It's called a Republic based on the rule of law. What we have now is a democracy degrading into feudalism. Choose your Duke wisely. But, you are correct, they are not going to fix it. Every nation, and I mean EVERY nation, when they get to this point they just default. I wonder how much money China still has in US treasury notes.

                                          Charlie Gilley You're going to tell me what I want to know, or I'm going to beat you to death in your own house. "Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783 “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759

                                          K Offline
                                          K Offline
                                          KP Lee
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #41

                                          charlieg wrote:

                                          What we have now is a democracy degrading into feudalism.

                                          We've never had a democracy in America except in one of the first colonies that was starving to death until a dictator took over and imposed law. I won't argue that what we have now isn't degrading into feudalism. (Does that count as a double negative?)

                                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups