Spam
-
Once it gets to the point that they are all deleted in under a minute, quite plainly.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
Christian Graus wrote:
Once it gets to the point that they are all deleted in under a minute, quite plainly.
they will create another account because they have plainly gotten to you.
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
Have you seen the forums where they are not moderated, you move on as you cannot find anything but spam. I think you are mixing trolls and spammers! Spammers get nuked, trolls get ignored.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
Mycroft Holmes wrote:
Have you seen the forums where they are not moderated, you move on as you cannot find anything but spam. I think you are mixing trolls and spammers! Spammers get nuked, trolls get ignored.
No I am saying the same thing from before we had voting or reporting. If you ignore trolls they will go to forums where they will be validated, just as we are doing here,
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
Unfortunately, by recognizing these posts you are validating the spammer. It is you that is encouraging them to get another account and spam you some more. You have no one to blame but your righteous indignation. The only effective way to deal with a spammer is to ignore them. They are looking for validation and you are giving them that. I have been saying for years that if you do not validate their bad behavior they will go someplace else where they get a reaction, but some people cannot resist the urge to respond. Continue to validate them and they will continue to spam you. The choice is yours.
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopesWhat do you mean by "validating" spammers? Is deleting a form of validation (in your definition)? By *not* deleting them, we'd only be increasing their revenue, and they'd come back and post more and more spam once they find out nobody is deleting their posts.
-
Unfortunately, by recognizing these posts you are validating the spammer. It is you that is encouraging them to get another account and spam you some more. You have no one to blame but your righteous indignation. The only effective way to deal with a spammer is to ignore them. They are looking for validation and you are giving them that. I have been saying for years that if you do not validate their bad behavior they will go someplace else where they get a reaction, but some people cannot resist the urge to respond. Continue to validate them and they will continue to spam you. The choice is yours.
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopesCurrent system of "Reporting Spam" in CP is good. If some posts, that look like spam, I can report it here. I think it is good enough to handle these spammers.
___ ___ ___
|__ |_| |\ | | |_| \ /
__| | | | \| |__| | | / -
Christian Graus wrote:
you're wrong. They are spamming to advertise a service.
And if no one clicked on their link do you think they will persist?
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopesJimmyRopes wrote:
And if no one clicked on their link do you think they will persist?
yes its called back-link harvesting and search engines do care...
-
Unfortunately, by recognizing these posts you are validating the spammer. It is you that is encouraging them to get another account and spam you some more. You have no one to blame but your righteous indignation. The only effective way to deal with a spammer is to ignore them. They are looking for validation and you are giving them that. I have been saying for years that if you do not validate their bad behavior they will go someplace else where they get a reaction, but some people cannot resist the urge to respond. Continue to validate them and they will continue to spam you. The choice is yours.
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopesI can't help but think you are wrong - these seem to be spam farms - they don't care where they put the stuff, they are paid to post it as much as possible. They don't seem to care that they post the same cr@p as a question and as an answer - which makes the spam less visible since it is removed from the unanswered list, just that they have posted it twice. Commenting on it encourages people to look at the Spam forum, and hopefully means that it all gets nuked earlier - defeating the original purpose of the spam.
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
-
Mark_Wallace wrote:
That doesn't make sense. It's spam, not trolling.
If the spammer (probably a bot) from a few threads down had not had his membership cancelled, he would probably have continued to post messages every few minutes for hours.
i.e. the result of an "ignore and move on" policy would have necessitated everyone having to "move on" through numerous pages of the same spammed message.
No-one is responding to the spammers; they're just getting reported and deleted.I don't think these are bots. They are real people with fragile egos that will cease and desist when ignored. You are entitled to your opinion, but how has that been working out for you?
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopesJimmyRopes wrote:
You are entitled to your opinion, but how has that been working out for you?
Better than yours, apparently. Bd idea to stand up and shout "I'm smarter than everyone!" in a forum full of highly intelligent people.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Mycroft Holmes wrote:
Have you seen the forums where they are not moderated, you move on as you cannot find anything but spam. I think you are mixing trolls and spammers! Spammers get nuked, trolls get ignored.
No I am saying the same thing from before we had voting or reporting. If you ignore trolls they will go to forums where they will be validated, just as we are doing here,
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopesJimmyRopes wrote:
If you ignore trolls they will go to forums where they will be validated, just as we are doing here,
Again, the discussion is about spam, not trolling. If you allow spammed links to persist, they will continue to be posted. They should not be ignored.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
I can't help but think you are wrong - these seem to be spam farms - they don't care where they put the stuff, they are paid to post it as much as possible. They don't seem to care that they post the same cr@p as a question and as an answer - which makes the spam less visible since it is removed from the unanswered list, just that they have posted it twice. Commenting on it encourages people to look at the Spam forum, and hopefully means that it all gets nuked earlier - defeating the original purpose of the spam.
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
Good luck to you. How has it been working out so far?
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
Current system of "Reporting Spam" in CP is good. If some posts, that look like spam, I can report it here. I think it is good enough to handle these spammers.
___ ___ ___
|__ |_| |\ | | |_| \ /
__| | | | \| |__| | | /Sanjay K. Gupta wrote:
Current system of "Reporting Spam" in CP is good.
It makes you feel like you have power. :-D
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes -
What do you mean by "validating" spammers? Is deleting a form of validation (in your definition)? By *not* deleting them, we'd only be increasing their revenue, and they'd come back and post more and more spam once they find out nobody is deleting their posts.
Indivara wrote:
What do you mean by "validating" spammers? Is deleting a form of validation (in your definition)?
Yes it is. :doh:
The report of my death was an exaggeration - Mark Twain
Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs
Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems
I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes
