Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Illinois is becoming like most of Europe.

Illinois is becoming like most of Europe.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
htmlcomquestionannouncement
103 Posts 23 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Ennis Ray Lynch Jr

    When I did the research the AR style rifles are really kind of cool from an enthusiast perspective. You can keep all of the same hardware and swap out receivers/barrels, depending on what type of shooting you want to do. Want to plink or target shoot in they yard, swap in a .22 receiver, want to hunt, swap in the .223, want to do anything in between swap a few parts. Really, a very cool piece of machinery when you think about it. Of course, considering an 8 round .22 revolver is just as capable of killing kids as an assault rifle, we will all be safer with out the rifles, Not like a revolver fits concealed in your pocket while the rifle has to be visibly carried. But I digress. Ban all guns, all income should go to the government and then be redistributed based on need, cars that go over 60mph are to fast, and trucks are a waste, what we need is global public transit. Every one deserves free health care too; waiting 4 months to see a doctor so you can be denied surgery because you don't fit the right "category" is perfectly acceptable. Oh, and, ban, soccer, that game sucks. (This line is likely the most offensive line in my post)

    Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost "All users always want Excel" --Ennis Lynch

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    Don't forget to use your car accident stats. Form this day forth you must be under 50 and over 25 to drive and be able to stand and pee to get a driver's licence. Big brother loves you. That is all.

    Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • W wizardzz

      From my experience, Italian Americans are the most eager.

      J Offline
      J Offline
      jeron1
      wrote on last edited by
      #32

      Hey wassamaddayou!

      W 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J jeron1

        Hey wassamaddayou!

        W Offline
        W Offline
        wizardzz
        wrote on last edited by
        #33

        Yeah, it was a mafie joke, but in some seriousness. I know many people of Jewish and Italian dissent that have been raised with a distrust of governments, especially gungrabbers. I'm not playing Godwin's Law, just saying that people of this cultural background have been raised with certain values.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L lewax00

          LabVIEWstuff wrote:

          Flame-throwers - I'm guessing they'd be fine, shoot your deer and BBQ it at the same time?

          Flamethrowers are completely legal to make/own in the U.S., in fact I don't think they've ever been regulated. But let's look in the other direction too, should we ban all knives? Those are also weapons. Only criminals should be allowed to eat steak!

          T Offline
          T Offline
          Testing 1 2 uh 7
          wrote on last edited by
          #34

          Why stop at knives? Baseball bats and hammers can kill a person too. Cars kill more people than guns, as do poisons (accidentally ingested household cleaners, usually), so let's ban cars and cleaners! One death is one death too many!

          J L 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • T Testing 1 2 uh 7

            Why stop at knives? Baseball bats and hammers can kill a person too. Cars kill more people than guns, as do poisons (accidentally ingested household cleaners, usually), so let's ban cars and cleaners! One death is one death too many!

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jimmy Savile
            wrote on last edited by
            #35

            What you are forgetting is everything that you have mentioned has other predominate uses other than to kill people, and were designed to be, and are used in other ways than to kill people. Guns however are designed to kill people.

            W L J 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • T Testing 1 2 uh 7

              Why stop at knives? Baseball bats and hammers can kill a person too. Cars kill more people than guns, as do poisons (accidentally ingested household cleaners, usually), so let's ban cars and cleaners! One death is one death too many!

              L Offline
              L Offline
              LabVIEWstuff
              wrote on last edited by
              #36

              Maybe it's the speed at which they can kill that differentiates guns from the other things you mention, and possibly why some gun enthusiasts would think that putting even more powerful weapons into the hands of their fellow civilians might not be a good thing? A hammer, knife, generally you'd kill one person at a time, then have to move on to the next. With a car you could plough into a bus stop and get 3 or 4 at a time, but the car would be scrap or have to build speed back up again. This all takes time and reduces the rate at which the deaths can accumulate. A handgun, still one person at a time, but if you have a crowd then you could maybe kill someone every 2s or so??? You see where I'm going with this... As we climb the weapons ladder we increase the rate at which we can kill, which brings me back to the question - is there an acceptable rate? A helicopter gunship could wipe out a football stadium in double-quick time, should they be allowed in the hands of the public? I hasten to add that I don't think I have any answers here, I'm just interested in the thought processes that people go through when forming their opinions. Andy B

              T 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris C B

                Yup - safer - just like Switzerlend.[^]

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Marco Bertschi
                wrote on last edited by
                #37

                We don't have it this often. We have more people died in car crashs after speeding than killed by weapons. However, you can always discuss "Is it the weapon which kills people or the one who shoot the weapon is who kills people". Difficult thing... However, if you want to kill someone you can do it with a gun... or with your bare hands. Doesn't matter, the other guy is dead anyways.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jimmy Savile

                  What you are forgetting is everything that you have mentioned has other predominate uses other than to kill people, and were designed to be, and are used in other ways than to kill people. Guns however are designed to kill people.

                  W Offline
                  W Offline
                  wizardzz
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #38

                  Then what about alcohol?

                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L LabVIEWstuff

                    Very good point, although like cars knives have other uses whereas guns are designed for killing prey (human or otherwise). Maybe it's just the 'fighting chance' aspect of guns that make us lily-livered liberals queasy? This may be naive but I've always thought that if get a warning and you can run fast enough or hide somewhere you at least have a small chance against a knife attacker, or car, or baseball-bat, whereas against a gun you can't run, can't really hide so you are in essence an execution. Hmm, maybe I'm coming round to the arm-everyone argument, but then surely we'd have to ban alcohol or anything else that impares judgement? Andy B

                    W Offline
                    W Offline
                    wizardzz
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #39

                    Would you argue for the banning of "assault knives?" Also, anyone can get a car, regardless of criminal history, anyone can also buy booze, regardless of history. Do repeat offenders continue to drink and drive and murder innocent people who don't have a fighting chance? Yes, hundreds of times a year.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Jimmy Savile

                      What you are forgetting is everything that you have mentioned has other predominate uses other than to kill people, and were designed to be, and are used in other ways than to kill people. Guns however are designed to kill people.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      lewax00
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #40

                      That reasoning can be applied to other things as well: steak knives were designed primarily for cutting flesh. Sounds like a dangerous weapon to me.

                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • W wizardzz

                        Aside from being flat broke, they are also about to ban any semi automatic weapon. Rifle, shotgun, handgun, probably slingshot, that usb nerf dart launcher on your desk? Probably illegal soon. http://www.bizjournals.com/chicago/news/2013/01/03/illinois-assault-weapons-ban-passes.html

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        BobJanova
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #41

                        I don't really want to jump into the gun control debate en masse right now. But your post has a pretty ludicrous example of a slippery slope fallacy there. Banning assault weapons does not lead automatically to banning slingshots and nerf dart launchers.

                        E W 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • L LabVIEWstuff

                          I'm genuinely curious as to whether there is a line the gun enthusiasts would draw as to which weapons were and were not suitable for Joe Public? Handguns - fine Single-shot rifles - fine Assault Rifles - fine Flame-throwers - I'm guessing they'd be fine, shoot your deer and BBQ it at the same time? Tanks - ? Helicopter gunships - ? Chemical weapons - ? Nukes - ? Andy B

                          B Offline
                          B Offline
                          BobJanova
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #42

                          The sooner everyone agrees there is a line, and what is under discussion is where to draw it, the sooner sanity can prevail. I'm sure the most lily-livered liberal would say that safety knives are okay, and the most red-necked right winger would agree that letting people have anthrax or napalm isn't.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • W wizardzz

                            Then what about alcohol?

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            Jimmy Savile
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #43

                            Sorry don't think I'm understanding your point?

                            W 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L lewax00

                              That reasoning can be applied to other things as well: steak knives were designed primarily for cutting flesh. Sounds like a dangerous weapon to me.

                              J Offline
                              J Offline
                              Jimmy Savile
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #44

                              Yes, but it has the function of cutting up meat, which every house-hold will need. I cannot think of a situation where I would need a gun, apart from if I wanted to kill someone.

                              T L J 3 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • J Jimmy Savile

                                Yes, but it has the function of cutting up meat, which every house-hold will need. I cannot think of a situation where I would need a gun, apart from if I wanted to kill someone.

                                T Offline
                                T Offline
                                Testing 1 2 uh 7
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #45

                                There are a lot of households that supplement their diets with meat obtained by hunting. Yes, the point is still to kill something, but that is also true of bows and arrows, mousetraps and flypaper.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L LabVIEWstuff

                                  Maybe it's the speed at which they can kill that differentiates guns from the other things you mention, and possibly why some gun enthusiasts would think that putting even more powerful weapons into the hands of their fellow civilians might not be a good thing? A hammer, knife, generally you'd kill one person at a time, then have to move on to the next. With a car you could plough into a bus stop and get 3 or 4 at a time, but the car would be scrap or have to build speed back up again. This all takes time and reduces the rate at which the deaths can accumulate. A handgun, still one person at a time, but if you have a crowd then you could maybe kill someone every 2s or so??? You see where I'm going with this... As we climb the weapons ladder we increase the rate at which we can kill, which brings me back to the question - is there an acceptable rate? A helicopter gunship could wipe out a football stadium in double-quick time, should they be allowed in the hands of the public? I hasten to add that I don't think I have any answers here, I'm just interested in the thought processes that people go through when forming their opinions. Andy B

                                  T Offline
                                  T Offline
                                  Testing 1 2 uh 7
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #46

                                  Okay, we can look at this from a few different directions. Let's start with the ability to kill people quickly in large quantities. As was demonstrated some 12 years ago, airplanes have the ability to kill thousands of people in one go (given the right set of circumstances). Given that no one is advocating eliminating airplanes, why should we focus on ways of killing people that are orders of magnitude less efficient? If you want to scale it down a bit, I would argue that many places in the world can demonstrate the destructiveness of homemade explosives that are easy to make with a little research. No one is advocating restricting access to the necessary ingredients. So now let's try from the other side of the coin. Airplanes have other uses, as do cars and knives and hammers. Guns, on the other hand, are solely for destructive purposes, so let's ban them all. Now, that will affect hunting, which is a big thing in the U.S. States sell a lot of hunting licenses and use the seasons to control animal populations. But I suppose we can lose that revenue and pay specialists to kill the animals to control the population. Or let the populations grow unchecked. Of course, this only solves the issue of people who follow the law. Most of the gun violence in America is actually committed with illegal guns. Maybe making those guns more illegal will make people think twice. It also doesn't address the guns that our government gives to the drug cartels on the border, but since that's technically in Mexico I suppose there's no way that could come back to bite us. Maybe the issue is that it's better for the media to sensationalize things, and it's easier to sensationalize bigger things. So even though there are more handgun deaths than assault rifle deaths, we focus on assault rifles. And even though there are more deaths by bee stings, we choose to focus on shark attacks. Cars and alcohol are responsible for lots of deaths, but they don't drive viewer like the fear of violent crime.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L LabVIEWstuff

                                    I'm genuinely curious as to whether there is a line the gun enthusiasts would draw as to which weapons were and were not suitable for Joe Public? Handguns - fine Single-shot rifles - fine Assault Rifles - fine Flame-throwers - I'm guessing they'd be fine, shoot your deer and BBQ it at the same time? Tanks - ? Helicopter gunships - ? Chemical weapons - ? Nukes - ? Andy B

                                    E Offline
                                    E Offline
                                    Ennis Ray Lynch Jr
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #47

                                    Citizens should only be allowed to own and possess the same weapons there government is allowed to own an posses. We live in a world were the police are issued fully automatic assault rifles and civilians are told (in some cities) they are not even allowed to own a pistol. How can so many be so blind to the past as to think this is a good thing?

                                    Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost "All users always want Excel" --Ennis Lynch

                                    C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • B BobJanova

                                      I don't really want to jump into the gun control debate en masse right now. But your post has a pretty ludicrous example of a slippery slope fallacy there. Banning assault weapons does not lead automatically to banning slingshots and nerf dart launchers.

                                      E Offline
                                      E Offline
                                      Ennis Ray Lynch Jr
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #48

                                      Think of the children

                                      Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost "All users always want Excel" --Ennis Lynch

                                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • E Ennis Ray Lynch Jr

                                        Citizens should only be allowed to own and possess the same weapons there government is allowed to own an posses. We live in a world were the police are issued fully automatic assault rifles and civilians are told (in some cities) they are not even allowed to own a pistol. How can so many be so blind to the past as to think this is a good thing?

                                        Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost "All users always want Excel" --Ennis Lynch

                                        C Offline
                                        C Offline
                                        Colin Mullikin
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #49

                                        This is exactly my stance. I read an article the other day that was about a literal interpretation of the Second Amendment which pretty much came to the same conclusion. The People should be armed to a similar level as the government's military.

                                        The United States invariably does the right thing, after having exhausted every other alternative. -Winston Churchill America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between. -Oscar Wilde Wow, even the French showed a little more spine than that before they got their sh*t pushed in.[^] -Colin Mullikin

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J Jimmy Savile

                                          Civilised? Well Done Illinois.

                                          T Offline
                                          T Offline
                                          thrakazog
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #50

                                          With the OP now removed... I can only guess the food in Illinois just got worse.

                                          Play my game Gravity: IOS[^], Android[^], Windows Phone 7[^]

                                          W 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups