Why wait to be outsourced when you can do it yourself?
-
From the Article:
The scheme worked very well for Bob. In his performance assessments by the firm's human resources department, he was the firm's top coder for many quarters and was considered expert in C, C++, Perl, Java, Ruby, PHP, and Python.
From the Article:
Further investigation found that the enterprising Bob had actually taken jobs with other firms and had outsourced that work too, netting him hundreds of thousands of dollars in profit as well as lots of time...
Bob is my hero! :cool:
My programming get away... The Blog... Taking over the world since 1371!
-
Yeah, I think Leslie Nielson did that too. Working from home via VPN - what a great idea![^]
-
Stumbled on this article[^], apparently the guy outsourced his own work at a fraction of his pay...I wish I had thought of that! :laugh:
Since he had already built a productive relationship with the outsource "partners", they should have kept him on to manage outsourcing.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Stumbled on this article[^], apparently the guy outsourced his own work at a fraction of his pay...I wish I had thought of that! :laugh:
-
From the Article:
The scheme worked very well for Bob. In his performance assessments by the firm's human resources department, he was the firm's top coder for many quarters and was considered expert in C, C++, Perl, Java, Ruby, PHP, and Python.
From the Article:
Further investigation found that the enterprising Bob had actually taken jobs with other firms and had outsourced that work too, netting him hundreds of thousands of dollars in profit as well as lots of time...
Bob is my hero! :cool:
My programming get away... The Blog... Taking over the world since 1371!
Super Lloyd wrote:
Bob is my hero!
Mine too - Why the hell didn't I think of that?
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932 -
Stumbled on this article[^], apparently the guy outsourced his own work at a fraction of his pay...I wish I had thought of that! :laugh:
Dang, I would 5 that find (even though it is a repost) if I could, but I can't, so I won't... Why can't I btw? For how friggin' long is the voting gonna remain turned off??? Can't Chris just buy more hamsters? (Or outsource it to China?)
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932 -
From the Article:
The scheme worked very well for Bob. In his performance assessments by the firm's human resources department, he was the firm's top coder for many quarters and was considered expert in C, C++, Perl, Java, Ruby, PHP, and Python.
From the Article:
Further investigation found that the enterprising Bob had actually taken jobs with other firms and had outsourced that work too, netting him hundreds of thousands of dollars in profit as well as lots of time...
Bob is my hero! :cool:
My programming get away... The Blog... Taking over the world since 1371!
Bear in mind that Bob is no longer with the company, and that Bob's workmates have probably found their jobs outsourced to China as well...
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
-
Stumbled on this article[^], apparently the guy outsourced his own work at a fraction of his pay...I wish I had thought of that! :laugh:
I've been surprised at how mildly everyone is viewing this. It's like folks think he's clever for gaming the system. If this guy had worked for me, there would be a black, glassy crater where his cubicle used to be. The lazy motherfucker defrauded me in the most basic terms of his employment contract. Worse, he opened my internal network to an outside agency. Not only would I have terminated his employment, I would have filed a criminal complaint against him and sought civil penalties as well.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
I've been surprised at how mildly everyone is viewing this. It's like folks think he's clever for gaming the system. If this guy had worked for me, there would be a black, glassy crater where his cubicle used to be. The lazy motherfucker defrauded me in the most basic terms of his employment contract. Worse, he opened my internal network to an outside agency. Not only would I have terminated his employment, I would have filed a criminal complaint against him and sought civil penalties as well.
Software Zen:
delete this;Gary R. Wheeler wrote:
The lazy mother****** defrauded me in the most basic terms of his employment contract.
I wouldn't say that. You give him money, he gets the work done. That's like saying someone defrauded you because they used some code from CP instead of writing it themselves.
Gary R. Wheeler wrote:
Worse, he opened my internal network to an outside agency.
That, on the other hand, I can see as a problem.
-
Since he had already built a productive relationship with the outsource "partners", they should have kept him on to manage outsourcing.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
That's what I thought. He got better work done at a fraction of the cost, the guy should clearly be moved into management instead of development. Then again, since they had access to all the invoices, I guess they don't need him to hire the guys he was outsourcing to now...
-
Gary R. Wheeler wrote:
The lazy mother****** defrauded me in the most basic terms of his employment contract.
I wouldn't say that. You give him money, he gets the work done. That's like saying someone defrauded you because they used some code from CP instead of writing it themselves.
Gary R. Wheeler wrote:
Worse, he opened my internal network to an outside agency.
That, on the other hand, I can see as a problem.
lewax00 wrote:
You give him money, he gets the work done.
I hired him for the skills he advertised in his resume/CV and presented during his interview. Having another person/company do the work, without explicitly stating that up front, is misrepresentation and fraudulent.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
lewax00 wrote:
You give him money, he gets the work done.
I hired him for the skills he advertised in his resume/CV and presented during his interview. Having another person/company do the work, without explicitly stating that up front, is misrepresentation and fraudulent.
Software Zen:
delete this;Gary R. Wheeler wrote:
Having another person/company do the work, without explicitly stating that up front, is misrepresentation and fraudulent.
So I go back to my example, wouldn't getting code from somewhere like CP then also be fraud? (Unless I were to specifically state during the interview that I would do it at a later date?)
-
Gary R. Wheeler wrote:
Having another person/company do the work, without explicitly stating that up front, is misrepresentation and fraudulent.
So I go back to my example, wouldn't getting code from somewhere like CP then also be fraud? (Unless I were to specifically state during the interview that I would do it at a later date?)
I think there's a subtle difference here. The guy in this case isn't doing the work at all. His employer agreed to pay him for his skills and his time, not some third party of unproven capability. Presumably when you obtain code from CP to do your job, you're also assuming responsibility for that code meeting all the considerations involved. Somehow, I doubt this guy cared about that.
Software Zen:
delete this; -
I think there's a subtle difference here. The guy in this case isn't doing the work at all. His employer agreed to pay him for his skills and his time, not some third party of unproven capability. Presumably when you obtain code from CP to do your job, you're also assuming responsibility for that code meeting all the considerations involved. Somehow, I doubt this guy cared about that.
Software Zen:
delete this;Fair enough, but then would you have a problem if the guy took the time to verify everything then? I just guess personally, I don't think I'd care as long as the work was getting done correctly and in a timely fashion for the amount of money I was willing to pay. Issues of security (opening the VPN to a third party) and IP (presumably he gave them complete access to the product's source code to do the work...especially in a country like China that tends to disregard foreign IP as it sees fit) would be concerning though.
-
Fair enough, but then would you have a problem if the guy took the time to verify everything then? I just guess personally, I don't think I'd care as long as the work was getting done correctly and in a timely fashion for the amount of money I was willing to pay. Issues of security (opening the VPN to a third party) and IP (presumably he gave them complete access to the product's source code to do the work...especially in a country like China that tends to disregard foreign IP as it sees fit) would be concerning though.
Agreed, the contract is I pay you and this gets done to an acceptable quality. So long as that's being met it doesn't matter if you outsource or not. It's similar to a company outsourcing, then finding that the company they outsourced to uses contractors - not a problem so long as the inputs and outputs of the black box meet the requirements of the contract. The security argument is valid and probably goes against the company's guidelines so gives them a good case for fair dismissal. The guy losing his job isn't so bad; sounds like he's earnt enough to do OK for himself and he'll now probably set up a software development company of his own.
-
Stumbled on this article[^], apparently the guy outsourced his own work at a fraction of his pay...I wish I had thought of that! :laugh:
Seems to me bob would have done well to clone the work to a private source tree, then after merging commits made by his outsourced workers, made the commits to the company repo himself. Or something along those line (would depend somewhat on how the employer's source control was set up). Does not address the NDA concerns, but overall, his mistake was allowing the network footprints to reveal his scheme.
-
I've been surprised at how mildly everyone is viewing this. It's like folks think he's clever for gaming the system. If this guy had worked for me, there would be a black, glassy crater where his cubicle used to be. The lazy motherfucker defrauded me in the most basic terms of his employment contract. Worse, he opened my internal network to an outside agency. Not only would I have terminated his employment, I would have filed a criminal complaint against him and sought civil penalties as well.
Software Zen:
delete this;You get this in all walks of employment. Hiring a construction company to do work will get you a contractor with some of his own workers and specialties, and several sub contractors he hires. Many times the people you hire never do any actual work, it's all subs.
If it moves, compile it
-
Stumbled on this article[^], apparently the guy outsourced his own work at a fraction of his pay...I wish I had thought of that! :laugh:
The whole story sounds very fishy to me. Even with daily scrum meetings, face to face talks and discussions (in English), it's time consuming to manage complex projects. Some guy in some remote province of China, barely speaking engrish can do a perfect job?? I don't think so. Check the source of the aricle. It the bottom is probably some clever asian trying to make a case for outsourcing. http://www.engrish.com/wp-content/uploads//2012/12/freshness-you-can-taste.jpg[^]
-
That's what I thought. He got better work done at a fraction of the cost, the guy should clearly be moved into management instead of development. Then again, since they had access to all the invoices, I guess they don't need him to hire the guys he was outsourcing to now...
LOL but wait, there's more... Apparently Bob was working on "critical applications" which clearly was intended to mean "classified applications." He could be in violation of the OSA or one of its derivatives; certainly having a resident of a foreign country, much less China with its general lack of respect for other people's technical secrets, working on anything that could be classified as "critical" without even the tacit consent of his management makes his termination from employment the LEAST of the consequences of this stupidity. I expect the security establishment will be very busy ruining his peace of mind for some time to come.
"Seize the day" - Horace "It's not what he doesn't know that scares me; it's what he knows for sure that just ain't so!" - Will Rogers, said by him about Herbert Hoover
-
Since he had already built a productive relationship with the outsource "partners", they should have kept him on to manage outsourcing.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
Only problem is that he was fundamentally lying to his company. He let unknown foreign hackers have his login credentials, even shipping them a hardware security token. It's not a surprise the company were miffed to find unknown people on their network, looking at their proprietary code (and who knows what else). C'mon, this was an outrageous breach of trust. This guy ought to go to jail. Even if you think Bob was a hero, if anything had gone wrong (foreign hackers being what they are) Bob would have been in some deep legal doo-doo.
