Shiva Lingam
-
Don't know, you could ask in "Site Bugs and Suggestions". You can't move it yourself.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]Thank's Keith. I will try to contact Siteadmin. Regards,
Prasad P. Khandekar Knowledge exists, man only discovers it.
-
I just thought of upvoting this! Not sure what force did this!
Quick Homepage - www.FaceLaptop.com
-
This it the wrong forum, I just wonder if you did want to post it here. This forum is for "Weird and Wonderful" programming stuff. What you have here is certainly weird, it looks lie nothing more than a stone sex toy or possibly a highly stylised penis penetrating an extremely stylised, well ladypart. It doesn't look like an efficient weapon to me, it is too compact for one thing.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]Quote:
it looks lie nothing more than a stone sex toy or possibly a highly stylised penis penetrating an extremely stylised, well ladypart.
Dear Keith can you please show little respect in here. Though it might be posted in wrong forum but comparing a sacred devotional thing (though for some communities) with a sex toy is really unnecessary.
Do not go where the path may lead. Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.
-
Quote:
it looks lie nothing more than a stone sex toy or possibly a highly stylised penis penetrating an extremely stylised, well ladypart.
Dear Keith can you please show little respect in here. Though it might be posted in wrong forum but comparing a sacred devotional thing (though for some communities) with a sex toy is really unnecessary.
Do not go where the path may lead. Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.
Tushar321 wrote:
Dear Keith can you please show little respect in here
Where do you get off telling me what to do? The right to free speech is more important the the right to not be offended, and it simply does look like a sex toy. In fact, when I first opened the article I thought it was a sex toy. I'm not commenting further as this will go downhill very quickly and we will never agree.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
Quote:
it looks lie nothing more than a stone sex toy or possibly a highly stylised penis penetrating an extremely stylised, well ladypart.
Dear Keith can you please show little respect in here. Though it might be posted in wrong forum but comparing a sacred devotional thing (though for some communities) with a sex toy is really unnecessary.
Do not go where the path may lead. Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.
Tushar321 wrote:
comparing a sacred devotional thing (though for some communities) with a sex toy is really unnecessary.
Why? The whole point to a free exchange of ideas in a public forum is that people express what they really think, not to censor their thoughts and words by what someone else may not agree with. Don't be so sensitive about stuff like this.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
-
Tushar321 wrote:
Dear Keith can you please show little respect in here
Where do you get off telling me what to do? The right to free speech is more important the the right to not be offended, and it simply does look like a sex toy. In fact, when I first opened the article I thought it was a sex toy. I'm not commenting further as this will go downhill very quickly and we will never agree.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]Keith Barrow wrote:
we will never agree.
Sure we will... we just did...
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
-
Tushar321 wrote:
Dear Keith can you please show little respect in here
Where do you get off telling me what to do? The right to free speech is more important the the right to not be offended, and it simply does look like a sex toy. In fact, when I first opened the article I thought it was a sex toy. I'm not commenting further as this will go downhill very quickly and we will never agree.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
Quote:
Where do you get off telling me what to do? The right to free speech
Oh, the irony. :)
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Shut up, right ;P
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
Shut up, right ;P
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]Fine. :sigh: It always cracks me up to see someone essentially tell someone else, "Don't you dare tell me what to do. I have free speech." The irony always kills me. I doubt you meant that but it could be viewed by some that way. :)
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Tushar321 wrote:
comparing a sacred devotional thing (though for some communities) with a sex toy is really unnecessary.
Why? The whole point to a free exchange of ideas in a public forum is that people express what they really think, not to censor their thoughts and words by what someone else may not agree with. Don't be so sensitive about stuff like this.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
Quote:
that people express what they really think
Which is what Tushar321 did. :)
Quote:
Don't be so sensitive about stuff like this.
Agreed. Anyone who cares what strangers on a public forum say need to reevaluate their priorities.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Fine. :sigh: It always cracks me up to see someone essentially tell someone else, "Don't you dare tell me what to do. I have free speech." The irony always kills me. I doubt you meant that but it could be viewed by some that way. :)
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Yeh, the irony isn't lost on me either, a bit like liberal opposition to extremist groups. I don't have problem him getting upset I what I said or expressing his view, more the expectation that I should modify my behaviour to suit.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
Yeh, the irony isn't lost on me either, a bit like liberal opposition to extremist groups. I don't have problem him getting upset I what I said or expressing his view, more the expectation that I should modify my behaviour to suit.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
"This forum is purely for amusement." I suppose your original post qualifies. :)
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Quote:
that people express what they really think
Which is what Tushar321 did. :)
Quote:
Don't be so sensitive about stuff like this.
Agreed. Anyone who cares what strangers on a public forum say need to reevaluate their priorities.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
ryanb31 wrote:
Which is what Tushar321 did. :)
All too correct. :doh:
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
-
Quote:
it looks lie nothing more than a stone sex toy or possibly a highly stylised penis penetrating an extremely stylised, well ladypart.
Dear Keith can you please show little respect in here. Though it might be posted in wrong forum but comparing a sacred devotional thing (though for some communities) with a sex toy is really unnecessary.
Do not go where the path may lead. Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.
Tushar321 wrote:
Dear Keith can you please show little respect in here.
You're in the wrong place - that is not going to happen.
Tushar321 wrote:
comparing a sacred devotional thing (though for some communities) with a sex toy is really unnecessary.
No, it's completely necessary: any religion or belief that is so fragile that it can't handle a little irreverence deserves all it gets. Besides, it does look like some sort of freaky sex toy.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
-
Hi, Came across an article about ShivaLinga. Is it just a symbol or more. Could it be a power source or compact but highly efficient weapon, which needs to be kept cool. Nuclear decay seems to generate lot of heat and for this reason depleted rods needs to be kept submerged in water for a very long period. Any thoughts.
Prasad P. Khandekar Knowledge exists, man only discovers it.
Prasad Khandekar wrote:
Any thoughts.
You need help?
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair. nils illegitimus carborundum me, me, me
-
Quote:
it looks lie nothing more than a stone sex toy or possibly a highly stylised penis penetrating an extremely stylised, well ladypart.
Dear Keith can you please show little respect in here. Though it might be posted in wrong forum but comparing a sacred devotional thing (though for some communities) with a sex toy is really unnecessary.
Do not go where the path may lead. Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.
As I'm not going to click the link, how else would I know what it looks like?
-
Hi, Came across an article about ShivaLinga. Is it just a symbol or more. Could it be a power source or compact but highly efficient weapon, which needs to be kept cool. Nuclear decay seems to generate lot of heat and for this reason depleted rods needs to be kept submerged in water for a very long period. Any thoughts.
Prasad P. Khandekar Knowledge exists, man only discovers it.
Wrong forum.
-
Tushar321 wrote:
Dear Keith can you please show little respect in here
Where do you get off telling me what to do? The right to free speech is more important the the right to not be offended, and it simply does look like a sex toy. In fact, when I first opened the article I thought it was a sex toy. I'm not commenting further as this will go downhill very quickly and we will never agree.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]