Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Curiosity - Which Linux brand/version do you prefer?

Curiosity - Which Linux brand/version do you prefer?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
linuxquestionannouncement
16 Posts 14 Posters 19 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • I Iceman

    Just wondering what your preferences are as to stability/ease of use/support/features, etc.

    A Offline
    A Offline
    Anders Molin
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    Iceman wrote: Which Linux brand/version do you prefer? NULL ;) - Anders Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"

    M M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • I Iceman

      Just wondering what your preferences are as to stability/ease of use/support/features, etc.

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Richard Melton
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      RedHat. Stability is pretty similar among all distros, but redhat has the best support and I believe the best patch system, but I haven't tried others.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I Iceman

        Just wondering what your preferences are as to stability/ease of use/support/features, etc.

        V Offline
        V Offline
        Vikram A Punathambekar
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Go for RedHat. v 8.0 rocks! Questions should be mailed to binarybandit@operamail.com . Do not put off until runtime what you can do at compile-time.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Iceman

          Just wondering what your preferences are as to stability/ease of use/support/features, etc.

          G Offline
          G Offline
          Giles
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          I've only used and old verion of Red Hat, and a various versions of Mandrake. Personally I use Mandrake, as I prefer KDE, and its seems Redhat have abandoned it to keep Sun happy. I was considering a move to Suse though, and will probably move if Mandrake does not make it out of administration. Quote from a clever bloke : "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." - Albert Einstein

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • I Iceman

            Just wondering what your preferences are as to stability/ease of use/support/features, etc.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Josh Knox
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            Slackware is all I've ever used. Has every thing I need. Dropline Gnome is a great desktop package for Slackware. Makes it easy to get up and running and stay updated. I use RedHat at werk. Josh Knox

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • I Iceman

              Just wondering what your preferences are as to stability/ease of use/support/features, etc.

              J Offline
              J Offline
              John A Davis
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              I currently use Gentoo which is the best Linux I have used over the past 10 years. You only have to install the software you require and all this software is compiled using the optimizations you specify. Not for the faint hearted but a great way to learn the inner workings of a Linux system. If you want a point and click install stick with something like Redhat otherwise head over to www.gentoo.org[^]

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Iceman

                Just wondering what your preferences are as to stability/ease of use/support/features, etc.

                T Offline
                T Offline
                Tim Smith
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                FreeBSD *snicker* Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Tim Smith

                  FreeBSD *snicker* Tim Smith I'm going to patent thought. I have yet to see any prior art.

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jorgen Sigvardsson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  Tim Smith wrote: FreeBSD *snicker* Now that's a statement which pisses Linux and FreeBSD users off. :rolleyes: -- Ihre ganze Unterseite sind gehören uns.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Anders Molin

                    Iceman wrote: Which Linux brand/version do you prefer? NULL ;) - Anders Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Masaaki Onishi
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Hello, the CPians around the world.;) I am surprised that you seem not to know Linux at all.:wtf: I believe that connecting to Linux must improve our programming skill as well as change the idea of Windows. As the main poster asks us: I installed RedHat Linux 6.1 and 7.2. How do you want to Linux as the workstation or server? If you want to use Linux as the workstation, RedHat 8.0 seems to be the excellent GUI. If you want to use Linux as the server, the version of Linux may not matter so much because we can download the new Apache server and the others for free. RedHat has rpm file extention for us to install the program easily. We have to use make command to install the program on other Linux OS, and I feel that this is so weried to me. X| Last, RedHat 7.2 has the bug of cc or gcc (?) linker, and we can't link to the kernel library very well.:~ RedHat 7.3 is fixed for this bug. -Masaaki Onishi (eCoolSoft)- ASP.NET and Windows Development by C# and MFC. http://www.ecoolsoft.com

                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • I Iceman

                      Just wondering what your preferences are as to stability/ease of use/support/features, etc.

                      B Offline
                      B Offline
                      Brian Delahunty
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Iceman wrote: Just wondering what your preferences are as to stability/ease of use/support/features, etc. For ease of instalation and use and so on I'd go for mandrake but I just prefer SuSE myself... It has a very good control system and it's easy enough to use and install. Regards, Brian Dela :-)
                      Run naked in the snow until you're sweating like a stuck pig and can't seem to catch your breath. When the flu becomes pneumonia, they can cure that with a shot. - Roger Wright

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Masaaki Onishi

                        Hello, the CPians around the world.;) I am surprised that you seem not to know Linux at all.:wtf: I believe that connecting to Linux must improve our programming skill as well as change the idea of Windows. As the main poster asks us: I installed RedHat Linux 6.1 and 7.2. How do you want to Linux as the workstation or server? If you want to use Linux as the workstation, RedHat 8.0 seems to be the excellent GUI. If you want to use Linux as the server, the version of Linux may not matter so much because we can download the new Apache server and the others for free. RedHat has rpm file extention for us to install the program easily. We have to use make command to install the program on other Linux OS, and I feel that this is so weried to me. X| Last, RedHat 7.2 has the bug of cc or gcc (?) linker, and we can't link to the kernel library very well.:~ RedHat 7.3 is fixed for this bug. -Masaaki Onishi (eCoolSoft)- ASP.NET and Windows Development by C# and MFC. http://www.ecoolsoft.com

                        A Offline
                        A Offline
                        Anders Molin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Oh, I know Linux. I have used it a lot, but I still hate it. That's why I said my prefered distro is "NULL" (no linux at all) :-D - Anders Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • I Iceman

                          Just wondering what your preferences are as to stability/ease of use/support/features, etc.

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Matt Newman
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Debian has a great package system, however the packages are usually behind in version, for example KDE 3 is something never seen on a debian system without a lot of work. My preference is FreeBSD if I have to use a *nix based system because it runs more effeciently as a server. -:suss:Matt Newman / Windows XP Activist:suss:
                          "Well, the guy that's giving you a hard time is a f***in moron, and you can tell him thats straight from another Linux user." - John Simmons on Linux Users
                          Just do the American thing and shoot him... - Jim Crafton on Linux Users
                          ...no matter where you wear your towel, the law is the law... - Christian Graus on the law

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Anders Molin

                            Iceman wrote: Which Linux brand/version do you prefer? NULL ;) - Anders Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            markkuk
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            You should upgrade to the final release of Red Hat 8 ;P (The beta test version was called "(null)")

                            A 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M markkuk

                              You should upgrade to the final release of Red Hat 8 ;P (The beta test version was called "(null)")

                              A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Anders Molin
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              LOL :laugh: - Anders Money talks, but all mine ever says is "Goodbye!"

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups