WTF-OTD -
-
Shirley you don't think so? :confused:
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932 -
Yes, very interesting when it was posted before. Pete O'Neilsen[^]
--------------------------------- Obscurum per obscurius. Ad astra per alas porci. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. CCC Link[^] Can you Help?
Meh, different link. ;P
Reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol
-
I'm for saving the planet, however, if your idea of saving the planet is forcing me to drive 10mph below the speed limit while torturing me with an eye level view of your fat, spandex wrapped ass furiously working to keep your bike up to speed then I'd rather the planet be consumed in a ball of toxic fumes and fire. I side with the lady in the OP. I'm for thinning the herd.
-
I must say that apart from the road tax thing, I think that Emma does have a point: Here in Sweden, people ride bikes like I don't know what and totally ignore all traffic rules - because they know that if something happens, they're not the ones who get the blame even though it may be their fault. They don't only put themselves in danger, but also everybody around them. In my opinion, bikers should follow the same traffic rules that apply to everybody else in the traffic and take responsibility for their actions. That doesn't mean that I'm gonna go out and run down a few bikers, though (at least not until the law has been changed :rolleyes:)
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932No, she doesn't have a point: motorists do not own the roads. And cyclists are expected to obey the law just the same as motorists. It's strange how no one seems to complain when cars make illegal turns, drive on the wrong side of the road, exceed the speed limit, jump red lights, etc., etc. But just see one cyclist do it and all hell breaks loose.
Use the best guess
-
No, she doesn't have a point: motorists do not own the roads. And cyclists are expected to obey the law just the same as motorists. It's strange how no one seems to complain when cars make illegal turns, drive on the wrong side of the road, exceed the speed limit, jump red lights, etc., etc. But just see one cyclist do it and all hell breaks loose.
Use the best guess
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
motorists do not own the roads
Neither do the cyclists
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
And cyclists are expected to obey the law just the same as motorists
Maybe, but they don't see it like that, and they're not treated egally according to the law either.
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
But just see one cyclist do it and all hell breaks loose.
It's not just ONE cyclist - it's all of them!
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932 -
I'm subjected to rude cyclists from both ends. I get the enormous and dangerous slow downs in traffic when I'm in my car AND I get clipped by cyclists when I'm out on my walks. Add to that the unnecessary and goofy spandex pants, the self-righteous tirades, and near universal dis-regard for the law and yeah, I'm pretty much for open season on cyclists. I didn't start out detesting these guys. They earned it.
-
I must say that apart from the road tax thing, I think that Emma does have a point: Here in Sweden, people ride bikes like I don't know what and totally ignore all traffic rules - because they know that if something happens, they're not the ones who get the blame even though it may be their fault. They don't only put themselves in danger, but also everybody around them. In my opinion, bikers should follow the same traffic rules that apply to everybody else in the traffic and take responsibility for their actions. That doesn't mean that I'm gonna go out and run down a few bikers, though (at least not until the law has been changed :rolleyes:)
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932Johnny J. wrote:
In my opinion, bikers should follow the same traffic rules that apply to everybody else in the traffic and take responsibility for their actions.
If people could get behind the steering wheel of a car without getting the overpowering belief that they own the road and all on it, there would be no need for laws. The fact that you are in a car does not give you any special rights, and does not allow you to exclude yourself from meeting the requirements of civilised society. People want to get from A to B. Cyclists do so without damaging anything, spoiling the environment, or costing us all billions in taxes. So, in my opinion, the sooner drivers realise that they are not gods of the road, and interact with other people going from A to B, rather than attempt to dominate them, the better.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Johnny J. wrote:
In my opinion, bikers should follow the same traffic rules that apply to everybody else in the traffic and take responsibility for their actions.
If people could get behind the steering wheel of a car without getting the overpowering belief that they own the road and all on it, there would be no need for laws. The fact that you are in a car does not give you any special rights, and does not allow you to exclude yourself from meeting the requirements of civilised society. People want to get from A to B. Cyclists do so without damaging anything, spoiling the environment, or costing us all billions in taxes. So, in my opinion, the sooner drivers realise that they are not gods of the road, and interact with other people going from A to B, rather than attempt to dominate them, the better.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
Mark_Wallace wrote:
The fact that you are in a car does not give you any special rights, and does not allow you to exclude yourself from meeting the requirements of civilised society.
Same goes for you on your bike! And I maintain that the actions of the cyclist are more likely to put other peoples lives in danger than the actions of the car drivers...
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932 -
I'm subjected to rude cyclists from both ends. I get the enormous and dangerous slow downs in traffic when I'm in my car AND I get clipped by cyclists when I'm out on my walks. Add to that the unnecessary and goofy spandex pants, the self-righteous tirades, and near universal dis-regard for the law and yeah, I'm pretty much for open season on cyclists. I didn't start out detesting these guys. They earned it.
-
Mark_Wallace wrote:
The fact that you are in a car does not give you any special rights, and does not allow you to exclude yourself from meeting the requirements of civilised society.
Same goes for you on your bike! And I maintain that the actions of the cyclist are more likely to put other peoples lives in danger than the actions of the car drivers...
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932Johnny J. wrote:
And I maintain that the actions of the cyclist are more likely to put other peoples lives in danger than the actions of the car drivers...
Oh, absolutely. You only have to look at the figures. :zzz:
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Johnny J. wrote:
And I maintain that the actions of the cyclist are more likely to put other peoples lives in danger than the actions of the car drivers...
Oh, absolutely. You only have to look at the figures. :zzz:
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
Mark_Wallace wrote:
You only have to look at the figures.
Can't - there ARE no figures for accidents/fatalities/damages caused by cyclists because they never get any blame no matter what they do!
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932 -
“I knocked a cyclist off his bike. I have right of way, he doesn’t even pay road tax”
Yup a genuine real tweet from a lovely lass by the twitter name
@emmaway20; though her account has mysteriously disappeared. Apparently the police sent her a very nice message telling her she had committed an offence and needed to notify them PDQ. They really should introduce an Common Sense part to the driving test.Reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol
Aside from the obvious issue that she knocked down a cyclist and that having right of way doesn't mean you should drive into things, the thing that annoys me is the 'Road Tax' excuse. You see there is no road tax, you pay tax on your car. Your council tax is what pays for roads. And besides what going to damage the roads more, 90kg of bike and rider or many tons of car? Cyclists and drivers would all get along a little better if both would obey the rules. Cyclists cutting across lanes and running red lights, motorists cutting off cyclists and generally being ignorant of other road users. Then again maybe the problem is that some people just shouldn't be allowed out - I bet they're also the kinds of people that stand in the middle of the isle at the supermarket so nobody else can get past, or walk 4 abreast through crowded areas like some kind of rolling road block.
-SK Genius
Vehicle Simulation Demo - New and Improved!
-
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
motorists do not own the roads
Neither do the cyclists
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
And cyclists are expected to obey the law just the same as motorists
Maybe, but they don't see it like that, and they're not treated egally according to the law either.
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
But just see one cyclist do it and all hell breaks loose.
It's not just ONE cyclist - it's all of them!
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932Johnny J. wrote:
Maybe, but they don't see it like that, and they're not treated egally according to the law either.
Yes, they do see it like that. You are falling into this too common trap of seeing a few cyclists break the law, and concluding that they all do it. I see motorists breaking the law every day, am I to conclude that all motorists do the same? And on the second point they are treated exactly the same, according to the offence. In the UK you can even get penalty points on your driving licence for cycling offences.
Johnny J. wrote:
It's not just ONE cyclist - it's all of them!
That just is not true, and you know it.
Use the best guess
-
I can see how someone might be confused by my previous statements. I'm not advocating violence against cyclists. I'm for running them over if you can manage to get away with it. I hope that clears things up. :-D
-
Johnny J. wrote:
Maybe, but they don't see it like that, and they're not treated egally according to the law either.
Yes, they do see it like that. You are falling into this too common trap of seeing a few cyclists break the law, and concluding that they all do it. I see motorists breaking the law every day, am I to conclude that all motorists do the same? And on the second point they are treated exactly the same, according to the offence. In the UK you can even get penalty points on your driving licence for cycling offences.
Johnny J. wrote:
It's not just ONE cyclist - it's all of them!
That just is not true, and you know it.
Use the best guess
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
That just is not true, and you know it.
I admit it might be a generalisation, but I can say that for every time I see one car driver breaking the traffic rules, I see 10 bikers doing the same. Car drivers are generally more aware of the traffic rules (even though some choose to neglect them), and they are also more aware of their potential power to do damage in the traffic than the biker. If you had to pass a test and have a bikers license to be allowed to ride a bike, I think it it would be a great improvement. Because that would make the bikers more aware that there ARE rules to follow - it's not just getting on the bike and going as fast as possible with no regards to others (including pedestrians).
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932 -
MehGerbil wrote:
I'm for running them over if you can manage to get away with it.
That's even more stupid than your first comment. You think deliberately injuring or killing someone is acceptable?
Use the best guess
-
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
That just is not true, and you know it.
I admit it might be a generalisation, but I can say that for every time I see one car driver breaking the traffic rules, I see 10 bikers doing the same. Car drivers are generally more aware of the traffic rules (even though some choose to neglect them), and they are also more aware of their potential power to do damage in the traffic than the biker. If you had to pass a test and have a bikers license to be allowed to ride a bike, I think it it would be a great improvement. Because that would make the bikers more aware that there ARE rules to follow - it's not just getting on the bike and going as fast as possible with no regards to others (including pedestrians).
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932Johnny J. wrote:
can say that for every time I see one car driver breaking the traffic rules, I see 10 bikers doing the same.
I doubt that very much, especially considering the number of cyclists on the roads relative to the number of cars.
Johnny J. wrote:
Car drivers are generally more aware of the traffic rules
Another generalisation; I suspect in relative terms just as many cyclists are aware of the rules.
Johnny J. wrote:
If you had to pass a test and have a bikers license to be allowed to ride a bike, I think it it would be a great improvement.
I agree entirely.
Use the best guess
-
Richard MacCutchan wrote:
You think deliberately injuring or killing someone is acceptable?
It's the only way they'll learn. :-D <-- important clue.
-
I can see how someone might be confused by my previous statements. I'm not advocating violence against cyclists. I'm for running them over if you can manage to get away with it. I hope that clears things up. :-D
Quote:
I'm not advocating violence against cyclists. I'm for running them over if you can manage to get away with it.
Good call. It's not violence unless you get caught. :)
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
MehGerbil wrote:
It's the only way they'll learn.
:-D <-- important clue.Yes, and that girl in Norfolk thinks it's just a joke.
Use the best guess