MPL License
-
Over the last few weeks I've been looking into Open Source Licenses, trying to find one that fits my desires. So far the best fit seems to be the MPL 2.0. However I'm curious as to how well it is received by Commercial developers who use proprietary code alongside code under the MPL. So for those of you who use Open Source code alongside proprietary code, how comfortable are you using code covered under the MPL?
-
Over the last few weeks I've been looking into Open Source Licenses, trying to find one that fits my desires. So far the best fit seems to be the MPL 2.0. However I'm curious as to how well it is received by Commercial developers who use proprietary code alongside code under the MPL. So for those of you who use Open Source code alongside proprietary code, how comfortable are you using code covered under the MPL?
MPL is fine, I generally don't modify open source code anyways, so being required to submit fixes is no problem. And honestly, as long as it isn't copyleft, I'm usually comfortable with it. (LGPL is fine, because of it's loopholes, as is GPL on whole applications, but otherwise GPL/AGPL is a red flag.)