Any utility in limiting access of a web app to a country?
-
Web application has no use outside of US. I'm thinking of getting a firewall rule in place to restrict it to just US access. Couldn't hurt to reduce attack surface I'm thinking, and it doesn't cost me anything [assumption]. Any utility in doing this?
"Sanity is not statistical." - Eric Blair, 1984, Chapter 9
-
Web application has no use outside of US. I'm thinking of getting a firewall rule in place to restrict it to just US access. Couldn't hurt to reduce attack surface I'm thinking, and it doesn't cost me anything [assumption]. Any utility in doing this?
"Sanity is not statistical." - Eric Blair, 1984, Chapter 9
-
Web application has no use outside of US. I'm thinking of getting a firewall rule in place to restrict it to just US access. Couldn't hurt to reduce attack surface I'm thinking, and it doesn't cost me anything [assumption]. Any utility in doing this?
"Sanity is not statistical." - Eric Blair, 1984, Chapter 9
Why ? At least let us have a look at it, and after that, if there is something that is really localized, just block it at that level.
Nihil obstat
-
I don't think I can stop people using a proxy, in the special case of a DOS attack they would be limited to a proxy(s) or bots in the country of origin, and the logic of the firewall should also provide coverage. In the case of the "great unwashed" don't need to use it so why provide an access? Reducing attack surface is the goal.
"Sanity is not statistical." - Eric Blair, 1984, Chapter 9
-
Web application has no use outside of US. I'm thinking of getting a firewall rule in place to restrict it to just US access. Couldn't hurt to reduce attack surface I'm thinking, and it doesn't cost me anything [assumption]. Any utility in doing this?
"Sanity is not statistical." - Eric Blair, 1984, Chapter 9
+1 for knowing there is an "outside of the US"! :)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
Why ? At least let us have a look at it, and after that, if there is something that is really localized, just block it at that level.
Nihil obstat
-
+1 for knowing there is an "outside of the US"! :)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
+1 for knowing there is an "outside of the US"! :)
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
how do I vote '10' for that comment ? :-) you'll have to do with a '5', sorry
-
Web application has no use outside of US. I'm thinking of getting a firewall rule in place to restrict it to just US access. Couldn't hurt to reduce attack surface I'm thinking, and it doesn't cost me anything [assumption]. Any utility in doing this?
"Sanity is not statistical." - Eric Blair, 1984, Chapter 9
-
Web application has no use outside of US. I'm thinking of getting a firewall rule in place to restrict it to just US access. Couldn't hurt to reduce attack surface I'm thinking, and it doesn't cost me anything [assumption]. Any utility in doing this?
"Sanity is not statistical." - Eric Blair, 1984, Chapter 9
Lemme guess, you're working on a fix for the problem of European countries complaining that the US government has been warehousing and processing information about their citizens. (The one thing the Lounge is missing is its own, internal conspiracy theory.)
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
Lemme guess, you're working on a fix for the problem of European countries complaining that the US government has been warehousing and processing information about their citizens. (The one thing the Lounge is missing is its own, internal conspiracy theory.)
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
Mark_Wallace wrote:
The one thing the Lounge is missing is its own, internal conspiracy theory
Why do you think message previews are sent to the server AJAX-style rather than just doing everything in JavaScript? Whenever somebody posts something he doesn't like, Maunder is notified of the post and
-
Mark_Wallace wrote:
The one thing the Lounge is missing is its own, internal conspiracy theory
Why do you think message previews are sent to the server AJAX-style rather than just doing everything in JavaScript? Whenever somebody posts something he doesn't like, Maunder is notified of the post and
Dang you, Maunder! I just wanted to tell everybody that you
-
Dang you, Maunder! I just wanted to tell everybody that you
And there is is, brothers and sisters! Incontrovertible proof that Maunder is
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
And there is is, brothers and sisters! Incontrovertible proof that Maunder is
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
Oh come on you pair, it's not like Chris is really
Quad skating his way through the world since the early 80's... Booger Mobile - My bright green 1964 Ford Falcon - check out the blog here!! | If you feel generous - make a donation to Camp Quality!!
-
Mark_Wallace wrote:
The one thing the Lounge is missing is its own, internal conspiracy theory
Why do you think message previews are sent to the server AJAX-style rather than just doing everything in JavaScript? Whenever somebody posts something he doesn't like, Maunder is notified of the post and
-
Web application has no use outside of US. I'm thinking of getting a firewall rule in place to restrict it to just US access. Couldn't hurt to reduce attack surface I'm thinking, and it doesn't cost me anything [assumption]. Any utility in doing this?
"Sanity is not statistical." - Eric Blair, 1984, Chapter 9
Geocoding baby! :laugh:
-
:confused: what?
It's a joke mate. (I hate explaining them, almost as much as I hate seeing someone miss-out on a funny one) The inference is that Chris monitors all posts as they are made, NSA style. The posts were deliberately cut-off mid sentence as a way of saying "see, look - Chris even censored this post, he _must_ have the ability to monitor posts in real-time" :-D
Make it work. Then do it better - Andrei Straut
-
It's a joke mate. (I hate explaining them, almost as much as I hate seeing someone miss-out on a funny one) The inference is that Chris monitors all posts as they are made, NSA style. The posts were deliberately cut-off mid sentence as a way of saying "see, look - Chris even censored this post, he _must_ have the ability to monitor posts in real-time" :-D
Make it work. Then do it better - Andrei Straut
Of course I could understand the pun intended, but deliberately wanted to create a joke!
-
Of course I could understand the pun intended, but deliberately wanted to create a joke!
Okaaay. Actually, there's no pun there.
Google wrote:
Pun: A joke exploiting the different possible meanings of a word or the fact that there are words that sound alike but have different meanings
Protip: The confused icon, followed by "what?" just looks like you don't get it. ;P The miss-use of the word pun doesn't exactly help, either.
Make it work. Then do it better - Andrei Straut
