The Wrong Way
-
MehGerbil wrote:
you made a distinction I cannot appreciate, that being between 'sell' and 'steal'
There was a clear distinction in my reasoning at the time: I was thinking "sales site" and "identity/information thief", rather than "apple".
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
Dam! it I really liked your comment but completely misconstrued what you meant by steal. I thought that you were expanding on the sales sites, in a more political way.
"Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read." Frank Zappa 1980
-
A Camel is a horse designed by a committee.
--------------------------------- Obscurum per obscurius. Ad astra per alas porci. Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
-
Here is Bing's next strategy.[^] I want Bing to win the search engine wars - or at least put in a respectable showing. However, they seem to be taking this thing in the wrong direction. When I look at the proposed new Bing what I see a complex mess. Hey, I'm just looking for a piece of example SQL code - I don't want to be presented with a really busy screen full of tons of interactive features. I don't know why Microsoft insists on doing this when so many other companies make huge profits off keeping things as absolutely simple as possible. Compare the DrudgeReport with CNN.com - the reason I use the DrudgeReport is because I don't want my browser locking up because of crap flying around all over the screen. Is the art of the simple, functional, informative web page dead? I really think the best way for Bing to make in-roads is to become simpler than Google and then remain that way for a couple of decades. I hear people complaining about this sort of thing in the trenches all of the time. They are getting tired of things flying around the screen, stuff crammed into every little corner, the lag, the learning curve, the busy menus - just stop already.
"It's about doing rather than searching" Then a picture of Katy Perry, which in fairness I'd rather do than search.
PB 369,783 wrote:
I just find him very unlikeable, and I think the way he looks like a prettier version of his Mum is very disturbing.[^]
-
In all the parks, in all the cities of the world, there is no Statue of a Committee.* *Apart from Calais.
-
-
MY EYES!!!!! Ahhhh... I take back every negative thing I've ever said about the Scion Cube[^]
It was broke, so I fixed it.
-
Here is Bing's next strategy.[^] I want Bing to win the search engine wars - or at least put in a respectable showing. However, they seem to be taking this thing in the wrong direction. When I look at the proposed new Bing what I see a complex mess. Hey, I'm just looking for a piece of example SQL code - I don't want to be presented with a really busy screen full of tons of interactive features. I don't know why Microsoft insists on doing this when so many other companies make huge profits off keeping things as absolutely simple as possible. Compare the DrudgeReport with CNN.com - the reason I use the DrudgeReport is because I don't want my browser locking up because of crap flying around all over the screen. Is the art of the simple, functional, informative web page dead? I really think the best way for Bing to make in-roads is to become simpler than Google and then remain that way for a couple of decades. I hear people complaining about this sort of thing in the trenches all of the time. They are getting tired of things flying around the screen, stuff crammed into every little corner, the lag, the learning curve, the busy menus - just stop already.
it's MS. encrusting the UI with barnacles is what they do.
-
"It's about doing rather than searching" Then a picture of Katy Perry, which in fairness I'd rather do than search.
PB 369,783 wrote:
I just find him very unlikeable, and I think the way he looks like a prettier version of his Mum is very disturbing.[^]
:thumbsup: Thanks for the smile :laugh:
-
Here is Bing's next strategy.[^] I want Bing to win the search engine wars - or at least put in a respectable showing. However, they seem to be taking this thing in the wrong direction. When I look at the proposed new Bing what I see a complex mess. Hey, I'm just looking for a piece of example SQL code - I don't want to be presented with a really busy screen full of tons of interactive features. I don't know why Microsoft insists on doing this when so many other companies make huge profits off keeping things as absolutely simple as possible. Compare the DrudgeReport with CNN.com - the reason I use the DrudgeReport is because I don't want my browser locking up because of crap flying around all over the screen. Is the art of the simple, functional, informative web page dead? I really think the best way for Bing to make in-roads is to become simpler than Google and then remain that way for a couple of decades. I hear people complaining about this sort of thing in the trenches all of the time. They are getting tired of things flying around the screen, stuff crammed into every little corner, the lag, the learning curve, the busy menus - just stop already.
I've always believed it's a stupid name for a search engine. It reminds me of that irritating twerp of an insurance salesman in Groundhog Day. He's the wally that appears when the weatherman, Bill Murray, keeps stepping off the kerb into the icy puddle. An appropriate name then for Microsoft's offering. :-D
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
-
In all the parks, in all the cities of the world, there is no Statue of a Committee.* *Apart from Calais.
-
"It's about doing rather than searching" Then a picture of Katy Perry, which in fairness I'd rather do than search.
PB 369,783 wrote:
I just find him very unlikeable, and I think the way he looks like a prettier version of his Mum is very disturbing.[^]
-
Pompey wrote:
That is definitely a Town Centre. (Good find though)
-
Pompey wrote:
That is definitely a Town Centre. (Good find though)
-
it's MS. encrusting the UI with barnacles is what they do.
The ribbon does spring to mind, yes.
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
-
-
Here is Bing's next strategy.[^] I want Bing to win the search engine wars - or at least put in a respectable showing. However, they seem to be taking this thing in the wrong direction. When I look at the proposed new Bing what I see a complex mess. Hey, I'm just looking for a piece of example SQL code - I don't want to be presented with a really busy screen full of tons of interactive features. I don't know why Microsoft insists on doing this when so many other companies make huge profits off keeping things as absolutely simple as possible. Compare the DrudgeReport with CNN.com - the reason I use the DrudgeReport is because I don't want my browser locking up because of crap flying around all over the screen. Is the art of the simple, functional, informative web page dead? I really think the best way for Bing to make in-roads is to become simpler than Google and then remain that way for a couple of decades. I hear people complaining about this sort of thing in the trenches all of the time. They are getting tired of things flying around the screen, stuff crammed into every little corner, the lag, the learning curve, the busy menus - just stop already.
You have to understand their market analysis. Bing is catering to potheads from Hawaii needing directions along the CA coast highway to find the illegal growing fields while hitting Starbucks at various points along the way whilst the passengers look up photo-shopped actors and actresses as inspiration for doing the nasty in the back seat. At least, that's what I gleaned from that strategy link. And besides, what else would you expect from a search engine called "Bing?" Now, sadly, the problem is, everyone else will follow suite. Just look at what's happening with google maps. :( Marc
-
Dam! it I really liked your comment but completely misconstrued what you meant by steal. I thought that you were expanding on the sales sites, in a more political way.
"Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read." Frank Zappa 1980
AIRI, there were three items in the list, and only one co-ordinating conjunction, meaning that the three items were independent. [jumps in the Tardis] Here it is: "It's only people who want to advertise, sell, or steal who want the more complicated stuff." The punctuation alone makes the meaning purdy damned clear. Compare: -- people who want to advertise, or sell or steal
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
You have to understand their market analysis. Bing is catering to potheads from Hawaii needing directions along the CA coast highway to find the illegal growing fields while hitting Starbucks at various points along the way whilst the passengers look up photo-shopped actors and actresses as inspiration for doing the nasty in the back seat. At least, that's what I gleaned from that strategy link. And besides, what else would you expect from a search engine called "Bing?" Now, sadly, the problem is, everyone else will follow suite. Just look at what's happening with google maps. :( Marc
-
Here is Bing's next strategy.[^] I want Bing to win the search engine wars - or at least put in a respectable showing. However, they seem to be taking this thing in the wrong direction. When I look at the proposed new Bing what I see a complex mess. Hey, I'm just looking for a piece of example SQL code - I don't want to be presented with a really busy screen full of tons of interactive features. I don't know why Microsoft insists on doing this when so many other companies make huge profits off keeping things as absolutely simple as possible. Compare the DrudgeReport with CNN.com - the reason I use the DrudgeReport is because I don't want my browser locking up because of crap flying around all over the screen. Is the art of the simple, functional, informative web page dead? I really think the best way for Bing to make in-roads is to become simpler than Google and then remain that way for a couple of decades. I hear people complaining about this sort of thing in the trenches all of the time. They are getting tired of things flying around the screen, stuff crammed into every little corner, the lag, the learning curve, the busy menus - just stop already.
I couldn't agree more with "keep it the same way for several decades". The best example of a successful "simple" website is http://www.craigslist.org[^]. Its easy to find what you're looking for, and there are not distractions all over the page! Hogan
-
Looks like a committee to me. How about this one? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e2/Three_Graces_Louvre_Ma287.jpg[^]
