What to call array indexing starting at 0 vs. 1 ?

[vonb]

Ying and Yang :)

The signature is in building process.. Please wait...

[Kenneth Haugland]

Like showing the ring finger instead of the middle finger :laugh:

[PIEBALDconsult]

Maximilien wrote:

"0-based array" and "1 based array"

That's about right.

Maximilien wrote:

1 (e.g. pascal)

Pascal allows you to specify the range. And with OOP you can define a class that implements arbitrary indexing, e.g. new MyArray ( -5 , 10 ) .

[Lost User]

Yes.

[MarkTJohnson]

Yin and Yang :-O

[vonb]

My Chineese spelling is not so good... But Ying and Yang exist, it's a music band (Hip Hop duo) https://www.google.ch/#q=ying+yang+twins&safe=images[^]

The signature is in building process.. Please wait...

[Pete OHanlon]

Wimp. Real coders don't read documentation. ;P

Chill _Maxxx_
CodeStash - Online Snippet Management | My blog | MoXAML PowerToys | Mole 2010 - debugging made easier

[Espen Harlinn]

In a separate millenium I wrote a 1 based C++ string class - I think that was the best argument for zero based code I've ever seen.

Espen Harlinn Principal Architect, Software - Goodtech Projects & Services AS Projects promoting programming in "natural language" are intrinsically doomed to fail. Edsger W.Dijkstra

[Eytukan]

'0' based one- Just called it Orray. :-D

Starting to think people post kid pics in their profiles because that was the last time they were cute - Jeremy.

[Nicholas Marty]

I only have seen that in the Intellisense popup of some .NET function. Intellisense is all the documentation that I need. :laugh:

[Lost User]

The spelling is inbalanced? That seems fundamentally wrong..

[MarkTJohnson]

It's an imperfect world, screws fall out all the time.

[Nagy Vilmos]

Meh! Real men code with edlin.

speramus in juniperus

[Ravi Bhavnani]

Emacs. /ravi

My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

[Lost User]

Maximilien wrote:

Is there a technical term to say if an array starts at index 0 (e.g. C/C++) or 1 (e.g. pascal) ?

The term is "array", and they start at index 0. There's a difference when talking about strings, not arrays.

Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]

[glennPattonWork3]

Standard & Mutant ? why was Pascal 1 based? anyone know if Delphi is has one based arrays as it might explain some error generated by a test application I have to use?

[pkfox]

Real men code with Emacs and vi.

We can’t stop here, this is bat country - Hunter S Thompson RIP

[Lost User]

Let's call them Zeray and Oneray.

[Ravi Bhavnani]

Yes, zero-based and one-based indexing are correct terms. /ravi

My new year resolution: 2048 x 1536 Home | Articles | My .NET bits | Freeware ravib(at)ravib(dot)com

[Lost User]

glennPattonWork wrote:

why was Pascal 1 based?

It's not, neither is Object-Pascal (Delphi). The type-definition of an array would contain the start-index and the end-index. One would use 0, obviously. Dynamic arrays start at 0. Even BASIC[^] starts at 0.

Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]