Who Says Americans Overreact?
-
These stereotypes are annoying, aren't they? And no, I didn't write "each one its turn" ;)
Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop
-
-
I think labelling any individual because of its nationality is a mistake, each one should deserve the right to be considered as an entity, a human being.
Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop
-
-
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: But massive availability of guns You think guns are massively available? What then would you call the availability of ammunition!
shog nine
Ever since i heard the voice i thought i had no choice...
Shog9 wrote: What then would you call the availability of ammunition! Even more available I'm afraid. Anyhow, my point is that if weapons were more regulated in the US, I think there would be less gun related killings. A nervous finger is a lot less dangerous if it's not on a trigger. :) -- Say it darling Doesn’t seem like you want that kind of honey, honey
-
Ok, two people have mentioned that now, but wasn't it supposed to be taking the piss? :confused:
David Wulff
wasn't it supposed to be taking the piss? I'm not familiar with this expression used this way, David. What's the translation?
-
Shog9 wrote: What then would you call the availability of ammunition! Even more available I'm afraid. Anyhow, my point is that if weapons were more regulated in the US, I think there would be less gun related killings. A nervous finger is a lot less dangerous if it's not on a trigger. :) -- Say it darling Doesn’t seem like you want that kind of honey, honey
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: Anyhow, my point is that if weapons were more regulated in the US, I think there would be less gun related killings. It's possible... hard to predict though. Dangerous as they are, nervous fingers don't become harmless merely by removing them from a trigger. At some point, you've gotta look at what motivates people to be owning and using guns. If you haven't already, watch "Bowling for Columbine" - Michael Moore is an ass, but he makes some interesting observations just the same.
shog nine
Ever since i heard the voice i thought i had no choice...
-
A man whose daughter was hit with a snowball by a group of girls returned to the scene and opened fire with a gun, critically wounding a 10-year-old youngster, police said. http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/02/24/snowball.shooting.ap/index.html[^]
Its a thought........... The tigress is here :-D
-
Shog9 wrote: What then would you call the availability of ammunition! Even more available I'm afraid. Anyhow, my point is that if weapons were more regulated in the US, I think there would be less gun related killings. A nervous finger is a lot less dangerous if it's not on a trigger. :) -- Say it darling Doesn’t seem like you want that kind of honey, honey
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: Anyhow, my point is that if weapons were more regulated in the US, I think there would be less gun related killings. A nervous finger is a lot less dangerous if it's not on a trigger. This is one of those fanciful, but false "things". As an example, Florida had an extremely high crime rate in the recent past. This is a state with a lot of retirees and tourists, all easy targets. "You" would hear about car jackings, etc. Then a couple of years ago Florida passed a "right to carry" law. The crime rate went down. While there are many that would disagree, our constituition (via amendment) gives citizens the right to bare arms. My interpretation of this amendment, and others will disagree, is that this right was not put in place so folks could go hunting but to ensure that the citizens will not have to endure an oppressive government. Suppose that the government decided that everyone who had an Irish heritage could be put in railway cars and carted off to be .... The citizenry would have a way and the means to fight back. I get worried every time the government attempts to restrict this basic, constitutionally guaranteed right. Mike
-
Guns don't kill people, People kill People Guns don't kill people, Devon kills people. Guns don't kill people, Wait, guns do kill people. Guns don't kill people, Ninjas kill people. Guns don't kill people, massive overconsumption kills people Guns don't kill people, I like mayonnaise Guns don't kill people, paperclips kill people Guns don't kill people, paintballs kill people Guns don't kill people, Bullets do. Guns don't kill people, People kill guns. Guns don't kill people, football kills people Guns don't kill people, Robots kill people. Guns don't kill people, Children with NO MORAL VALUES kill people. Guns don't kill people, Henny Hoses Spewing 325° Peanut Oil Kill People. Guns don't kill people, But, they certainly help. Guns don't kill people, gun manufacturers do. Guns don't kill people, Charles Darwin Does. Guns don't kill people, Vandals Kill People. Guns don't kill people, Olympic Athletes Do. Guns don't kill people, Movies Kill People. Guns don't kill people, People kill People, with Guns.
shog nine
Ever since i heard the voice i thought i had no choice...
Shog9 wrote: Guns don't kill people, Devon kills people. I thought Devon just cracked people up? :~ Remind me not ta stop on my waay to Corrnwalll... ;) Just how do you write in a bad Cornish accent, anyway? Anna :rose: www.annasplace.me.uk
"Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
- Marcia GraeschTrouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++
-
Maybe it would be better titled Person overreacts.... Obviously the guy was a nut case. That isn't something that American's have a corner on. Uptight Ex-Military Republican married to a Commie Lib - How weird is that?
Of course not, but how'd such a nutcase get a gun licence in the first place? Anna :rose: www.annasplace.me.uk
"Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
- Marcia GraeschTrouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++
-
wasn't it supposed to be taking the piss? I'm not familiar with this expression used this way, David. What's the translation?
you gotta be joking! :laugh: If you're serious, boy are we going to have some fun with you over the next few days.. ;P Anna :rose: www.annasplace.me.uk
"Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
- Marcia GraeschTrouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++
-
wasn't it supposed to be taking the piss? I'm not familiar with this expression used this way, David. What's the translation?
Ed Gadziemski wrote: I'm not familiar with this expression used this way, David. What's the translation? I'm not David, but I supose I will do. Taking the piss, is....Taking the piss. Very hard to explain, so I will use what I believe is an American sayinhg that means the same. Taking the mickey. Shit stirring, not taking it seriously. Something English and Australians do with friends and family almost instinctively. So prevelant now that it happens at work and with people you don't know. Not stereotyping, my last company was American and I ran into many people from the US in the 3 years I was there. Spent 2 and a bit weeks in Cambridge MA in 1999. My experience is with Americans, you have to get to know them really well before piss taking is acceptable. When people would come to Australia to work with us they would get very offended with our standard office interaction. After a couple of weeks/months (depending on the individual) they not only became comfortable, they joined in the shit stirring. Michael Martin Australia mjm68@tpg.com.au "I personally love it because I can get as down and dirty as I want on the backend, while also being able to dabble with fun scripting and presentation games on the front end." - Chris Maunder 15/07/2002
-
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: Anyhow, my point is that if weapons were more regulated in the US, I think there would be less gun related killings. A nervous finger is a lot less dangerous if it's not on a trigger. This is one of those fanciful, but false "things". As an example, Florida had an extremely high crime rate in the recent past. This is a state with a lot of retirees and tourists, all easy targets. "You" would hear about car jackings, etc. Then a couple of years ago Florida passed a "right to carry" law. The crime rate went down. While there are many that would disagree, our constituition (via amendment) gives citizens the right to bare arms. My interpretation of this amendment, and others will disagree, is that this right was not put in place so folks could go hunting but to ensure that the citizens will not have to endure an oppressive government. Suppose that the government decided that everyone who had an Irish heritage could be put in railway cars and carted off to be .... The citizenry would have a way and the means to fight back. I get worried every time the government attempts to restrict this basic, constitutionally guaranteed right. Mike
Mike Gaskey wrote: our constituition (via amendment) gives citizens the right to bear arms. And that is why people have to be so careful with spelling. The word is supposed to be BARE ( as in allowed to get a nice tan ) but one misspelling and a whole country goes nuts.
[
](http://www.canucks.com)Sonork 100.11743 Chicken Little "You're obviously a superstar." - Christian Graus about me - 12 Feb '03 Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
-
Ed Gadziemski wrote: I'm not familiar with this expression used this way, David. What's the translation? I'm not David, but I supose I will do. Taking the piss, is....Taking the piss. Very hard to explain, so I will use what I believe is an American sayinhg that means the same. Taking the mickey. Shit stirring, not taking it seriously. Something English and Australians do with friends and family almost instinctively. So prevelant now that it happens at work and with people you don't know. Not stereotyping, my last company was American and I ran into many people from the US in the 3 years I was there. Spent 2 and a bit weeks in Cambridge MA in 1999. My experience is with Americans, you have to get to know them really well before piss taking is acceptable. When people would come to Australia to work with us they would get very offended with our standard office interaction. After a couple of weeks/months (depending on the individual) they not only became comfortable, they joined in the shit stirring. Michael Martin Australia mjm68@tpg.com.au "I personally love it because I can get as down and dirty as I want on the backend, while also being able to dabble with fun scripting and presentation games on the front end." - Chris Maunder 15/07/2002
Michael Martin wrote: My experience is with Americans, you have to get to know them really well before piss taking is acceptable LOL! I've had more than my share of "mis-understandings" at work by pre-emptive piss taking. How long do you need to know someone before you call their mom names? The word abbreviation is awfully long for what it means.
-
you gotta be joking! :laugh: If you're serious, boy are we going to have some fun with you over the next few days.. ;P Anna :rose: www.annasplace.me.uk
"Be yourself - not what others think you should be"
- Marcia GraeschTrouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++
Anna-Jayne Metcalfe wrote: you gotta be joking! I don't know what it means either. :-O Is it like "Taking the shit"? Which, in the US means pretty much being a scapegoat, ot getting picked-on. i.e.: "I'm not gonna take that shit from you!" or: "My wife's giving me shit for playing Warcraft all the time!" (which she does approve BTW, this is just an example) - Nitron
"Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb
-
Michael Martin wrote: My experience is with Americans, you have to get to know them really well before piss taking is acceptable LOL! I've had more than my share of "mis-understandings" at work by pre-emptive piss taking. How long do you need to know someone before you call their mom names? The word abbreviation is awfully long for what it means.
Chris Austin wrote: How long do you need to know someone before you call their mom names? Don't know about England but in Australia people wouldn't get upset if you called their mother a name. I mean if you systematically and continually insulted her you would probably find a few teeth were popping out the back of your head. But the whole 'your momma wears army boots' mentality as seen in Bugs Bunny/Porky Pig banter and US kids movies of the 70's/80's just didn't exist. You never thought to insult someones mother, you insulted them direct. And if someone did insult your mother you would probably think :wtf: this blokes a wanker and feel sorry for him being a bit soft in the head. Michael Martin Australia mjm68@tpg.com.au "I personally love it because I can get as down and dirty as I want on the backend, while also being able to dabble with fun scripting and presentation games on the front end." - Chris Maunder 15/07/2002
-
Mike Gaskey wrote: our constituition (via amendment) gives citizens the right to bear arms. And that is why people have to be so careful with spelling. The word is supposed to be BARE ( as in allowed to get a nice tan ) but one misspelling and a whole country goes nuts.
[
](http://www.canucks.com)Sonork 100.11743 Chicken Little "You're obviously a superstar." - Christian Graus about me - 12 Feb '03 Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
PJ Arends wrote: word is supposed to be BARE ( LOL Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
I'm guessing the concept of a 2 hour movie showing two guys eating a meal and talking struck them as 'foreign' Rob Manderson wrote:
-
Michael Martin wrote: My experience is with Americans, you have to get to know them really well before piss taking is acceptable LOL! I've had more than my share of "mis-understandings" at work by pre-emptive piss taking. How long do you need to know someone before you call their mom names? The word abbreviation is awfully long for what it means.
Chris Austin wrote: How long do you need to know someone before you call their mom names? Here in NZ, the faster it happens means the faster you are accepted. If I was to go to work with someone and it didn't happen in an hour, I'd think it was a bit of a stressful place. I think we treat it like an ice-breaker of sorts. Also doing it in a real serious way is really accepted, with everyone breaking into laughter at the end. Like others here, I find American culture isn't similar at all. Regardz Colin J Davies
Sonork ID 100.9197:Colin
I'm guessing the concept of a 2 hour movie showing two guys eating a meal and talking struck them as 'foreign' Rob Manderson wrote:
-
Jörgen Sigvardsson wrote: Anyhow, my point is that if weapons were more regulated in the US, I think there would be less gun related killings. A nervous finger is a lot less dangerous if it's not on a trigger. This is one of those fanciful, but false "things". As an example, Florida had an extremely high crime rate in the recent past. This is a state with a lot of retirees and tourists, all easy targets. "You" would hear about car jackings, etc. Then a couple of years ago Florida passed a "right to carry" law. The crime rate went down. While there are many that would disagree, our constituition (via amendment) gives citizens the right to bare arms. My interpretation of this amendment, and others will disagree, is that this right was not put in place so folks could go hunting but to ensure that the citizens will not have to endure an oppressive government. Suppose that the government decided that everyone who had an Irish heritage could be put in railway cars and carted off to be .... The citizenry would have a way and the means to fight back. I get worried every time the government attempts to restrict this basic, constitutionally guaranteed right. Mike
Mike Gaskey wrote: but to ensure that the citizens will not have to endure an oppressive government. sure. but now, if more than one person gets together and damages persons or property (with or without the use of guns) they are classified as "terrorists" (via the USA PATRIOT act, look it up) and can be held as enemy combatants, sent to a military jail, without a lawyer, or even without having charges brought against them. (as you probably know, this has already happened). ie. good bye due process, hello military justice. so, if you and your buddies decided to get together and storm the local courthouse, brandishing your precious 2nd amendment weapons, and happen to damage something in the name of "Free Billy and His Old Lady" (or whatever cause you're championing that day) you stand a good chance of ending up in an army base in Cuba - never to be heard from again. even better, is PATRIOT II (now working its way through the back rooms of congress and the attorney general's office): if this passes, the govt. will have the right to immediately strip you of your US citizenship, if they feel you're acting as a terrorist. sure, it's a little far fetched right now, since we all know terrorists have dark skin. but, once the laws are in place, all you need is a prosecutor willing to use it in court and *poof* you was gone. -c
When history comes, it always takes you by surprise.
