Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C#
  4. how to use thread in for loop in c#

how to use thread in for loop in c#

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C#
csharpperformancetutorialquestion
26 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    If the pings have a timeout, that should not be necessary, though it wouldn't be a problem either (as long as it's high enough to give the pings time to succeed).

    S Offline
    S Offline
    superselector
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    i think i need to specify timeout in join with more that 2500 ms as i have specified a time out of 2 sec. without any time out its very slow.

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S superselector

      i think i need to specify timeout in join with more that 2500 ms as i have specified a time out of 2 sec. without any time out its very slow.

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #17

      But sometimes the pings took 4 seconds, right?

      superselector wrote:

      without any time out its very slow.

      Well that's weird, it shouldn't take significantly longer than the longest running ping. Could you show the code?

      S 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        But sometimes the pings took 4 seconds, right?

        superselector wrote:

        without any time out its very slow.

        Well that's weird, it shouldn't take significantly longer than the longest running ping. Could you show the code?

        S Offline
        S Offline
        superselector
        wrote on last edited by
        #18

        yes the time out takes 4 secs, i have given 2 secs for testing ... actually on successful ping checking for ping i am trying to get some basic details of that ip using WMI.WMI is taking some time also if its not enabled.

        for (int index = startIP; index <= EndIP; index++)
        {
        ipVal = startSubnet + "." + index.ToString();

                       Thread wmithread = new Thread(() => PerformWMIOperation(ipVal.ToString().Trim(), txtUserName.Text.ToString().Trim(), txtPassword.Text.ToString(), txtDomain.Text.ToString(), dtAssetValues, chkImpersonate.Checked, recordnumber));
                        wmithread.Start();
                        wmithread.Join(2500);
                    }
        
        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S superselector

          yes the time out takes 4 secs, i have given 2 secs for testing ... actually on successful ping checking for ping i am trying to get some basic details of that ip using WMI.WMI is taking some time also if its not enabled.

          for (int index = startIP; index <= EndIP; index++)
          {
          ipVal = startSubnet + "." + index.ToString();

                         Thread wmithread = new Thread(() => PerformWMIOperation(ipVal.ToString().Trim(), txtUserName.Text.ToString().Trim(), txtPassword.Text.ToString(), txtDomain.Text.ToString(), dtAssetValues, chkImpersonate.Checked, recordnumber));
                          wmithread.Start();
                          wmithread.Join(2500);
                      }
          
          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #19

          Ok, not like that. Don't, "for every thread, start it, then join it". That just runs everything in serial. Do, "for every thread, start it. Then, for every thread, join it." That's how I said it: start them all then join them all.

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Ok, not like that. Don't, "for every thread, start it, then join it". That just runs everything in serial. Do, "for every thread, start it. Then, for every thread, join it." That's how I said it: start them all then join them all.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            superselector
            wrote on last edited by
            #20

            Hi i did not understand do you want the code to be changed to for (int index = startIP; index <= EndIP; index++) { ipVal = startSubnet + "." + index.ToString(); Thread wmithread = new Thread(() => PerformWMIOperation(ipVal.ToString().Trim(), txtUserName.Text.ToString().Trim(), txtPassword.Text.ToString(), txtDomain.Text.ToString(), dtAssetValues, chkImpersonate.Checked, recordnumber)); wmithread.Start(); wmithread.Join(); }

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S superselector

              Hi i did not understand do you want the code to be changed to for (int index = startIP; index <= EndIP; index++) { ipVal = startSubnet + "." + index.ToString(); Thread wmithread = new Thread(() => PerformWMIOperation(ipVal.ToString().Trim(), txtUserName.Text.ToString().Trim(), txtPassword.Text.ToString(), txtDomain.Text.ToString(), dtAssetValues, chkImpersonate.Checked, recordnumber)); wmithread.Start(); wmithread.Join(); }

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #21

              That wouldn't help. The problem is this:

              superselector wrote:

              wmithread.Start(); wmithread.Join();

              That's like calling that ping operation without a thread, except this way resources are wasted as well. Or to put it differently, it's like hiring a team to play a game of monopoly, in order to do it faster. That doesn't work. If everyone takes turns anyway, you might as well do it by yourself. You need an array of threads. Fill the array, start them all, then, and only then, join them all. Besides, what's with the WMI stuff? Do you need something that the Ping class[^] can't do?

              S 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                That wouldn't help. The problem is this:

                superselector wrote:

                wmithread.Start(); wmithread.Join();

                That's like calling that ping operation without a thread, except this way resources are wasted as well. Or to put it differently, it's like hiring a team to play a game of monopoly, in order to do it faster. That doesn't work. If everyone takes turns anyway, you might as well do it by yourself. You need an array of threads. Fill the array, start them all, then, and only then, join them all. Besides, what's with the WMI stuff? Do you need something that the Ping class[^] can't do?

                S Offline
                S Offline
                superselector
                wrote on last edited by
                #22

                can you please give a sample code to implement this

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S superselector

                  can you please give a sample code to implement this

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  Ok.. it's not that hard though.

                  Thread[] threads = new Thread[something];
                  for (int i = 0; i < threads.Length; i++)
                  {
                  threads[i] = new Thread(something);
                  threads[i].Start();
                  }
                  for (int i = 0; i < threads.Length; i++)
                  threads[i].Join();

                  S 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Ok.. it's not that hard though.

                    Thread[] threads = new Thread[something];
                    for (int i = 0; i < threads.Length; i++)
                    {
                    threads[i] = new Thread(something);
                    threads[i].Start();
                    }
                    for (int i = 0; i < threads.Length; i++)
                    threads[i].Join();

                    S Offline
                    S Offline
                    superselector
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    hi with this approach , I am missing data .. means i am not getting output for all the IPs

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Ok.. it's not that hard though.

                      Thread[] threads = new Thread[something];
                      for (int i = 0; i < threads.Length; i++)
                      {
                      threads[i] = new Thread(something);
                      threads[i].Start();
                      }
                      for (int i = 0; i < threads.Length; i++)
                      threads[i].Join();

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      superselector
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      The ip address is getting overlapped. Means two rows are having same ip address.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S superselector

                        The ip address is getting overlapped. Means two rows are having same ip address.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        Did you forget to use synchronization when saving the result?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups