US Army plans 'Iron Man' armour for soldiers
-
What I mean is that the use of force will always ultimately come down to people shooting at each other.
The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.
But isn't that the point of robots? I'll drive my robot around looking for you until I find you and then shoot you. All while in my pjs eating hot pockets. :)
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
But isn't that the point of robots? I'll drive my robot around looking for you until I find you and then shoot you. All while in my pjs eating hot pockets. :)
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Oh I see. :)
The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.
-
From science fiction to science fact, or just plain delusional?
The US Army is working to develop "revolutionary" smart armour that would give its troops "superhuman strength". It is calling on the technology industry, government labs and academia to help build the Iron Man-style suit.
Looks pretty cool and it probably won't be long before they have a working prototype. I hope they don't outsource the communications; soldier: shit is hitting the fan I need help quick help desk: this is nnnn I am here to assist you, could you give me your ID to confirm your identity?
VS2010/Atmel Studio 6.1 ToDo Manager Extension The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard. -Steven Wright
-
From science fiction to science fact, or just plain delusional?
The US Army is working to develop "revolutionary" smart armour that would give its troops "superhuman strength". It is calling on the technology industry, government labs and academia to help build the Iron Man-style suit.
I wonder where they are going to shove the micro pile required to power the bloody thing! Bateries ain't that good yet.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
-
I wonder where they are going to shove the micro pile required to power the bloody thing! Bateries ain't that good yet.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
You're just the guy to tell them where to shove it, too!
The difficult we do right away... ...the impossible takes slightly longer.
-
If you have the ability to build that why not just build robots and then wars can just be a battle between robots and no need for killing anyone.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
I think it's because robots are not quite there yet! But they do use robots already as much as they can. There are drones, gear carrying mules, deminers, probably more I dunno about!!
My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
-
I wonder where they are going to shove the micro pile required to power the bloody thing! Bateries ain't that good yet.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH
Hack the bloody suit with an i-Phone app. "Dance, soldier, dance!" :laugh:
-
If you have the ability to build that why not just build robots and then wars can just be a battle between robots and no need for killing anyone.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
if you remove the human cost and suffering from wars you will make them the default action rather than the last resort
You cant outrun the world, but there is no harm in getting a head start Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
-
That'll be useful for all that hand to hand combat you get in modern warfare.
“I believe that there is an equality to all humanity. We all suck.” Bill Hicks
It reminds me of the Star Trek episode where after millenniums of war, two conflicting countries' war evolved to where battles are entirely done by computer. Every day a missile would be sent to a random position in your country from the enemy's computers, and your computers would fire one back. Anyone in the kill zones must report to the disintegrators or real missiles will be used after the set time for death has been concluded. That way, you don't lose any of the culture or precious artifacts you have laying around (as the computers don't require changes to property). And you can keep your dignity by killing people :rolleyes:, but being civilised about it! Blood splatters are uncivilised!
-
If you have the ability to build that why not just build robots and then wars can just be a battle between robots and no need for killing anyone.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
It reminds me of the Star Trek episode where after millenniums of war, two conflicting countries' war evolved to where battles are entirely done by computer. Every day a missile would be sent to a random position in your country from the enemy's computers, and your computers would fire one back. Anyone in the kill zones must report to the disintegrators or real missiles will be used after the set time for death has been concluded. That way, you don't lose any of the culture or precious artifacts you have laying around (as the computers don't require changes to property). And you can keep your dignity by killing people :rolleyes:, but being civilised about it! Blood splatters are uncivilised!
Good summary of the episode (A Taste of Armegeddon). Of course the "moral" of the story was that these people had made war so sanitized and logical that they had removed the element of fear from the equation. In a supreme example of violating the non-interference principle Kirk destroys the computer and re-introduces fear by the imminent threat of real missles being used, thus finally resolving the centuries-old war. Fear... so under-valued.
