Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Windows XP Proff. better than 98?

Windows XP Proff. better than 98?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
helpquestion
32 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Michael P Butler

    DevHead wrote: 256 MB RAM I think you'll find that is your problem, IMO (and from experience) - Windows XP needs at least 512 and probably 1gb to be useable. Of course it does depend what XP is running in the background, do you have IIS running or other similiar services? Windows XP (apart from the Fisher Price Interface) is the best of Microsoft attempts at a windowing operating system. Michael Wonder Woman, Wonder Woman. All the world's waiting for you, and the power you possess. In your satin tights, Fighting for your rights And the old Red, White and Blue.

    G Offline
    G Offline
    Glenn Dawson
    wrote on last edited by
    #23

    I love it when it puts 880 MB into the system cache.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • W Willem B

      try installing all the driver the right way on your xp machine, this really looks like a wrong IDE controller driver. i had this problem to, but wenn i installed all the driver right my P4 was faster than ever. DevHead wrote: I think XP is worse than 98 TRY THIS: burning a cd at 48x while watching a divx movie and downloading 6 files with kazaa(everyone knows how much cpu time kazaa needs) i bet that you 98 machine will stutter and freak out, while you xp system still has resources left(IF you install the drivers right) DevHead wrote: installing DivX 3.11A there is realy something screwed up with our configuration.... []D [] []D []

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #24

      yeah well it's my dad's pc and I was just curious, but than again I got a PII on Win98 with 116mb RAM, I don't think I should install XP if I wish to keep this thing alive ;P

      W 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D David Wulff

        DevHead wrote: and now I want you opinion Don't ever consider a career in QA.


        David Wulff

        "David Wulff can't live without me, so you shouldn't either" - Paul Watson

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #25

        David Wulff wrote: Don't ever consider a career in QA. yeah well, I'm not thinking of it either :|, and you see the Humour status.....it's not very good.

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          My dad has Windows XP, on his computer it's slow though he has a P4 on 256 MB RAM, well he has lots of crap on it ;P, anywayz I think XP is worse than 98, I tried installing DivX 3.11A on it:mad: and it couldn't it has a serious problem with video support because XviD didnt work on it either.:omg: My opinion: XP sucks;P and now I want you opinion.

          E Offline
          E Offline
          Erik Funkenbusch
          wrote on last edited by
          #26

          Uhh.. DivX is on version 5.01, shouldn't you install a much more recent version? I love XP, and I find it much faster than 9x. You don't mention how you determine it to be slower. How? -- Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Marc Clifton

            I have 256 and find WXP to be perfectly useable. As soon as I installed VS.NET and fired it up, it sucked up almost all of the 256MB I had. Totally unusable, massive disk swapping within the IDE itself. Ugh. After upgrading to 512MB, everyone (namely ME) is now happy! I don't understand why they can't write an IDE that isn't such a hog. I mean, 256,000,000 bytes! I haven't looked at some of the competitor IDE's out there yet. Marc Help! I'm an AI running around in someone's f*cked up universe simulator.
            Sensitivity and ethnic diversity means celebrating difference, not hiding from it. - Christian Graus
            Every line of code is a liability - Taka Muraoka
            Microsoft deliberately adds arbitrary layers of complexity to make it difficult to deliver Windows features on non-Windows platforms--Microsoft's "Halloween files"

            E Offline
            E Offline
            Erik Funkenbusch
            wrote on last edited by
            #27

            Yes, VS.NET is a memory hog, but you have to realize that they keep expanding features to match the typical computer. Things like IntelliSense are not cheap in terms of memory and CPU power, nor are the ever expanding features like code collapsing, Dynamic Help, etc.. Actually, Dynamic Help is a huge drain on resources. Turn that off and you save a lot. -- Where are we going? And why am I in this handbasket?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              David Wulff wrote: Don't ever consider a career in QA. yeah well, I'm not thinking of it either :|, and you see the Humour status.....it's not very good.

              D Offline
              D Offline
              David Wulff
              wrote on last edited by
              #28

              The problem with a good British piss taking is that it has to be done with one hundred percent sincerity or it falls under the "smarmy git" category. I try my best... :-D


              David Wulff

              "David Wulff can't live without me, so you shouldn't either" - Paul Watson

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Marc Clifton

                I have 256 and find WXP to be perfectly useable. As soon as I installed VS.NET and fired it up, it sucked up almost all of the 256MB I had. Totally unusable, massive disk swapping within the IDE itself. Ugh. After upgrading to 512MB, everyone (namely ME) is now happy! I don't understand why they can't write an IDE that isn't such a hog. I mean, 256,000,000 bytes! I haven't looked at some of the competitor IDE's out there yet. Marc Help! I'm an AI running around in someone's f*cked up universe simulator.
                Sensitivity and ethnic diversity means celebrating difference, not hiding from it. - Christian Graus
                Every line of code is a liability - Taka Muraoka
                Microsoft deliberately adds arbitrary layers of complexity to make it difficult to deliver Windows features on non-Windows platforms--Microsoft's "Halloween files"

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Matt Newman
                wrote on last edited by
                #29

                I've run VS.NET with less ram and had no problems (yes it was on XP). I think you have something else on your computer is hogging resources. -:suss:Matt Newman / Windows XP Activist:suss:
                "Well, the guy that's giving you a hard time is a f***in moron, and you can tell him thats straight from another Linux user." - John Simmons on Linux Users
                Just do the American thing and shoot him... - Jim Crafton on Linux Users
                ...no matter where you wear your towel, the law is the law... - Christian Graus on the law

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Christian Graus wrote: Any computer will run faster with a lesser OS, one that does less and looks ugly. So if you were an OS you'd be faster than the speed of light? ;P Michael Martin Australia mjm68@tpg.com.au "I personally love it because I can get as down and dirty as I want on the backend, while also being able to dabble with fun scripting and presentation games on the front end." - Chris Maunder 15/07/2002

                  M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Matt Newman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #30

                  :omg: Michael Martin wrote: So if you were an OS you'd be faster than the speed of light? Very good! -:suss:Matt Newman / Windows XP Activist:suss:
                  "Well, the guy that's giving you a hard time is a f***in moron, and you can tell him thats straight from another Linux user." - John Simmons on Linux Users
                  Just do the American thing and shoot him... - Jim Crafton on Linux Users
                  ...no matter where you wear your towel, the law is the law... - Christian Graus on the law

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Christian Graus wrote: Any computer will run faster with a lesser OS, one that does less and looks ugly. So if you were an OS you'd be faster than the speed of light? ;P Michael Martin Australia mjm68@tpg.com.au "I personally love it because I can get as down and dirty as I want on the backend, while also being able to dabble with fun scripting and presentation games on the front end." - Chris Maunder 15/07/2002

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    Christian Graus
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #31

                    Michael Martin wrote: faster than the speed of light My wife claims that is already the case... Christian NO MATTER HOW MUCH BIG IS THE WORD SIZE ,THE DATA MUCT BE TRANSPORTED INTO THE CPU. - Vinod Sharma

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      yeah well it's my dad's pc and I was just curious, but than again I got a PII on Win98 with 116mb RAM, I don't think I should install XP if I wish to keep this thing alive ;P

                      W Offline
                      W Offline
                      Willem B
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #32

                      try NT4 or 2000... i thing 2000 is even better than xp []D [] []D []

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups