Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Bar bans Google Glass, boots 'rude' user

Bar bans Google Glass, boots 'rude' user

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
announcementcomquestiondiscussion
33 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Mark_Wallace

    Nope, you stated that he had three options:

    harold aptroot wrote:

    So anyway, he was faced with some choices: 1) leave 2) put it away without folding it 3) debate

    That is simply not the case. Were he in his own home, his mother's house, a public building, or his place of employment, he might have had some or all of those options, but a restaurant is private property, and has a code of conduct/public-service contract which gives him only two options: 1) Stop behaving like a dick, causing annoyance to staff and customers. 2) Get thrown out.

    I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #19

    You can absolutely have an argument with a restaurant manager and convince him/her that you shouldn't be thrown out. And besides, you can debate and lose.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      You can absolutely have an argument with a restaurant manager and convince him/her that you shouldn't be thrown out. And besides, you can debate and lose.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Mark_Wallace
      wrote on last edited by
      #20

      You can argue with anyone, any time, but that doesn't change your rights/options, and will certainly p1ss off the decent patrons of the establishment.

      I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Mark_Wallace

        You can argue with anyone, any time, but that doesn't change your rights/options, and will certainly p1ss off the decent patrons of the establishment.

        I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #21

        It adds the option of "have a debate". It increases the chance of winning because while that chance may be small, it is zero if you just take your leave.

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Simon Lee Shugar

          Man walks into a bar.... with Google glass on his head. The management of that bar / restaurant ask the gentlemen to remove the device, which is their prorogitive however was not their policy. The owner of the restaurant had banned the glass products in another establishment he owned but had not yet made it policy in the current restaurant. The Glass wearer decided to debate this policy before leaving. Now being a biased fan of Glass I would usually rule in the man's favour if he hadn't been a complete and utter Glasshole (yes I went there) about it. The man demanded, unreasonable, in a facebook post that the staff member be fired or her pay docked for following management wishes. Now my view on the situation is that Glass has an unfair prejudice just because of people's fear of being recorded by the devices. As the man was having a meal with his partner, he shouldn't of been distracted anyway, however this is just a symptom of information overload and shows what craving consumers we are. Now I sat down for a meal with my girlfriend last night and forced myself to put my phone to the side and ignore the ever tempting notifications I think it's a good thing to fully concentrate on a loved friend or family member. Don't get me wrong, when I get my version of Glass I will bask in the glory of on demand information whenever I want it. Anyway that's my thoughts in a nutshell, check out the links below. NBC News[^] Facebook post from Glasshole[^]

          Simon Lee Shugar (Software Developer) www.simonshugar.co.uk "If something goes by a false name, would it mean that thing is fake? False by nature?" By Gilbert Durandil

          Richard DeemingR Offline
          Richard DeemingR Offline
          Richard Deeming
          wrote on last edited by
          #22

          Simon Lee Shugar wrote:

          ...shouldn't of...

          Simon Lee Shugar wrote:

          ...would of...

          Simon Lee Shugar wrote:

          ...shouldn't of...

          Are you doing that deliberately to annoy us "grammar-nazis"? :mad: It's "have", not "of". Also:

          Simon Lee Shugar wrote:

          ...it put's himself in a negative light.

          There's no apostrophe in "puts", and it should be "him", not "himself". This lesson brought to you by the Pedant arm of the Grumpy Old Gits association.


          "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

          "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

          S 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

            Simon Lee Shugar wrote:

            ...shouldn't of...

            Simon Lee Shugar wrote:

            ...would of...

            Simon Lee Shugar wrote:

            ...shouldn't of...

            Are you doing that deliberately to annoy us "grammar-nazis"? :mad: It's "have", not "of". Also:

            Simon Lee Shugar wrote:

            ...it put's himself in a negative light.

            There's no apostrophe in "puts", and it should be "him", not "himself". This lesson brought to you by the Pedant arm of the Grumpy Old Gits association.


            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

            S Offline
            S Offline
            Simon Lee Shugar
            wrote on last edited by
            #23

            Sorry, its not something I'd usually take note of in forums. Anything written by me on a forum is just quick and dirty. ;) (edit: bad grammar)

            Simon Lee Shugar (Software Developer) www.simonshugar.co.uk "If something goes by a false name, would it mean that thing is fake? False by nature?" By Gilbert Durandil

            Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Simon Lee Shugar

              Sorry, its not something I'd usually take note of in forums. Anything written by me on a forum is just quick and dirty. ;) (edit: bad grammar)

              Simon Lee Shugar (Software Developer) www.simonshugar.co.uk "If something goes by a false name, would it mean that thing is fake? False by nature?" By Gilbert Durandil

              Richard DeemingR Offline
              Richard DeemingR Offline
              Richard Deeming
              wrote on last edited by
              #24

              Simon Lee Shugar wrote:

              Sorry, its not something I'd usually take note of in forums.

              "it's" ;P http://www.grammar-monster.com/easily_confused/its_its.htm[^]


              "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

              "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

              A 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                It adds the option of "have a debate". It increases the chance of winning because while that chance may be small, it is zero if you just take your leave.

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Mark_Wallace
                wrote on last edited by
                #25

                I fear that people at other tables, trying to enjoy their meals, will think of him as being quite the reverse of a winner, no matter the outcome of his childish, petty "debate" -- and I would tend to agree with their assessment.

                I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Mark_Wallace

                  I fear that people at other tables, trying to enjoy their meals, will think of him as being quite the reverse of a winner, no matter the outcome of his childish, petty "debate" -- and I would tend to agree with their assessment.

                  I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #26

                  Absolutely. Also irrelevant.

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Absolutely. Also irrelevant.

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Mark_Wallace
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #27

                    harold aptroot wrote:

                    Absolutely.

                    We're agreed, then: Only a d1ckhead and a loser would "debate" the issue, which is fully covered both by law and the guidelines of decent behaviour.

                    I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                      Simon Lee Shugar wrote:

                      Sorry, its not something I'd usually take note of in forums.

                      "it's" ;P http://www.grammar-monster.com/easily_confused/its_its.htm[^]


                      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                      A Offline
                      A Offline
                      Andrei Straut
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #28

                      I'll reply to this post to take into context the discussion above as well, but my quote is actually from your first one:

                      Richard Deeming wrote:

                      There's not apostrophe in "puts", and it should be "him", not "himself".

                      Shouldn't that be "there's no apostrophe", or "there's not an apostrophe"? And no, my English is by no means perfect. Grammanize at will!

                      This isn't a signature

                      Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Mark_Wallace

                        harold aptroot wrote:

                        Absolutely.

                        We're agreed, then: Only a d1ckhead and a loser would "debate" the issue, which is fully covered both by law and the guidelines of decent behaviour.

                        I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #29

                        Yes, I'd hate the guy who disturbed my meal with his stupid debate, and I expect most people would feel the same way. I'd also be the guy who disturbs other peoples' meals with his stupid debate, knowing full well that people will hate me for it. That makes me a dickhead, and I'm ok with that.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Andrei Straut

                          I'll reply to this post to take into context the discussion above as well, but my quote is actually from your first one:

                          Richard Deeming wrote:

                          There's not apostrophe in "puts", and it should be "him", not "himself".

                          Shouldn't that be "there's no apostrophe", or "there's not an apostrophe"? And no, my English is by no means perfect. Grammanize at will!

                          This isn't a signature

                          Richard DeemingR Offline
                          Richard DeemingR Offline
                          Richard Deeming
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #30

                          Damnit! Why does every attempt to correct someone else's grammar contain at least one mistake? :doh:


                          "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                          "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                          D 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                            Damnit! Why does every attempt to correct someone else's grammar contain at least one mistake? :doh:


                            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                            D Offline
                            D Offline
                            Dan Neely
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #31

                            Richard Deeming wrote:

                            Damnit! Why does every attempt to correct someone else's grammar contain at least one mistake? :doh:

                            It's Carma in action.

                            Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt

                            Richard DeemingR 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Dan Neely

                              Richard Deeming wrote:

                              Damnit! Why does every attempt to correct someone else's grammar contain at least one mistake? :doh:

                              It's Carma in action.

                              Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies. -- Sarah Hoyt

                              Richard DeemingR Offline
                              Richard DeemingR Offline
                              Richard Deeming
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #32

                              Dan Neely wrote:

                              It's Carma in action.

                              Oh, come on! :rolleyes:

                              Quote:[^]

                              CARMA (not to be confused with Karma[^]) may refer to:

                              • Carma, a transportation technology company (formerly known as Avego), based in Cork, Ireland
                              • Carma Developers, Canadian residential land developing company
                              • Carbon Monitoring for Action, part of the Center for Global Development
                              • Chicago Area Radio Monitoring Association, scanner radio listeners club based in the Chicago Illinois area
                              • Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy, astronomical instrument composed of 23 radio telescopes
                              • Computer-Assisted Research Mathematics and its Applications, a Priority Research Centre at the University of Newcastle, Australia

                              "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                              "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

                              A 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

                                Dan Neely wrote:

                                It's Carma in action.

                                Oh, come on! :rolleyes:

                                Quote:[^]

                                CARMA (not to be confused with Karma[^]) may refer to:

                                • Carma, a transportation technology company (formerly known as Avego), based in Cork, Ireland
                                • Carma Developers, Canadian residential land developing company
                                • Carbon Monitoring for Action, part of the Center for Global Development
                                • Chicago Area Radio Monitoring Association, scanner radio listeners club based in the Chicago Illinois area
                                • Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy, astronomical instrument composed of 23 radio telescopes
                                • Computer-Assisted Research Mathematics and its Applications, a Priority Research Centre at the University of Newcastle, Australia

                                "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

                                A Offline
                                A Offline
                                Andrei Straut
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #33

                                Center for Global Development wrote:

                                Center for Global Development

                                Which is the definitive proof that yanks can't spell properly (CGD is, apparently, Washington-based) vs:

                                Priority Research Centre wrote:

                                Priority Research Centre

                                Which spells properly, following the rules set long ago by the Great Empire. Let the fires burn! (ducking under the table)

                                This isn't a signature

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups