Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. A different view

A different view

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcom
20 Posts 9 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P peterchen

    What's "different"about this view? The Shrub and his cronies paint Saddam as the walking antichrist. Because it's students? Rarely should one be surprised that not all atudents are against bush. Both the second link, Your second link tells a lot about them... It's like saying "Tuvok is as hot as 7ontippelof9 'cause they both appear an Star Trek." And the Intro - thank you. You still remember who dropped the first one?


    If you go to war, you will destroy a great country a stoned greek chick to the richest man of the world
    sighist | Agile Programming | doxygen

    K Offline
    K Offline
    KaRl
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    I was in discotheque last night (yeah, rock n'roll,baby), and I heard perhaps the only song in german which made a major hit in France, ""99 luftballons". "99 Kriegsminister Streichholz und Benzinkanister Hielten sich für schlaue Leute Witterten schon fette Beute Riefen: Krieg und wollten Macht Mann, wer hätte das gedacht Daß es einmal soweit kommt Wegen 99 Luftballons" Sounds weird in these days, isn't it?


    Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Rob Graham

      peterchen wrote: And the Intro - thank you. You still remember who dropped the first one? Actually, the first two. To bring an early end to a protracted war, which resulted in the independance of many pacific rim nations, just as the war in the other hemisphere resulted in the liberation of much of Europe. And the only reason the US was first was that we narrowly beat Germany to the development. What this reminder contributes to your argument, however, completely escapes me. It is tiresome to constantly be reminded of this, particularly in contexts where it has no relevance. The less justified a man is in claiming excellence for his own self, the more ready he is to claim all excellence for his nation, his religion, his race or his holy cause. - Eric Hoffer

      P Offline
      P Offline
      peterchen
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      So it would be ok for Saddam to ask Kim Il for a nuke, and drop it on New York, when this would make the US back up and he could claim less people died than in an attack on Iraq? And if the US doesn't back up, another nuke on LA would surely be justified? *That*s what the reminder is for: are you willing to die by the same logic as you give death? The US didn't "narrowly beat germany" - germany wasn't even working on it: Einstein and otehrs were afraid they would do. The US had over 200 nukes before anyone else had even one. So stop your selfrighteous claims about the goods of a bomb, that never fell over your country.


      If you go to war, you will destroy a great country a stoned greek chick to the richest man of the world
      sighist | Agile Programming | doxygen

      R 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K KaRl

        I was in discotheque last night (yeah, rock n'roll,baby), and I heard perhaps the only song in german which made a major hit in France, ""99 luftballons". "99 Kriegsminister Streichholz und Benzinkanister Hielten sich für schlaue Leute Witterten schon fette Beute Riefen: Krieg und wollten Macht Mann, wer hätte das gedacht Daß es einmal soweit kommt Wegen 99 Luftballons" Sounds weird in these days, isn't it?


        Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

        P Offline
        P Offline
        peterchen
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        Yep, had it in my sig when the whole madness started ;) The english translation doesn't catch up, except for one line: "If I had a souvenir / just to prove the world was here"...


        If you go to war, you will destroy a great country a stoned greek chick to the richest man of the world
        sighist | Agile Programming | doxygen

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K KaRl

          If they are for War, they should enlisted in the Army, and be volunteers to jump the first over Bagdad.


          Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Mike Gaskey
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          KaЯl wrote: If they are for War, they should enlisted in the Army, and be volunteers to jump the first over Bagdad. The military training takes about 3 months for solid basic training with some time added for special training, jump school takes additional time - it'll be over before that. However, I am not speaking for them so many may have enlisted. Why do you assume they haven't? Mike

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            I remember a science fiction story where wars were waged by assasination - the top politicians and generals got it first ! They had very few wars...... Elaine The tigress is here :-D

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Mike Gaskey
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            Trollslayer wrote: the top politicians and generals got it first ! Great concept. I remember one even better though. In the one I remember, wars were fought by each antagonist selecting a surrogate. Both were dropped on an island, the country represented by the surviving surrogate won. Mike

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P peterchen

              So it would be ok for Saddam to ask Kim Il for a nuke, and drop it on New York, when this would make the US back up and he could claim less people died than in an attack on Iraq? And if the US doesn't back up, another nuke on LA would surely be justified? *That*s what the reminder is for: are you willing to die by the same logic as you give death? The US didn't "narrowly beat germany" - germany wasn't even working on it: Einstein and otehrs were afraid they would do. The US had over 200 nukes before anyone else had even one. So stop your selfrighteous claims about the goods of a bomb, that never fell over your country.


              If you go to war, you will destroy a great country a stoned greek chick to the richest man of the world
              sighist | Agile Programming | doxygen

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Rob Graham
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              peterchen wrote: The US had over 200 nukes before anyone else had even one. So stop your selfrighteous claims about the goods of a bomb, that never fell over your country. I never so much as suggested there was anything good about nuclear weapons. The point of mentioning that the logic of the time was that it would bring an early end to war with Japan was simply a reflection of the thinking of two generations ago that was used to justify the action. There was also no self-righteous intent, just a complaint over the sam old rant about the sins of my GRANDPARENTS... and a rant that does not lead to useful discourse, but merely offends. As for self-righteousness, was a nuclear weapon dropped on your country (or any country in your lifetime?). More rhetoric. peterchen wrote: So it would be ok for Saddam to ask Kim Il for a nuke, and drop it on New York, when this would make the US back up and he could claim less people died than in an attack on Iraq? And if the US doesn't back up, another nuke on LA would surely be justified? No, and by suggesting this you echo some of the very rhetoric that is being used to justify eliminating Saddam once and for all. The fact that you would use it as an argument only lends credence to that rhetoric..... peterchen wrote: The US didn't "narrowly beat germany" - germany wasn't even working on it: Einstein and otehrs were afraid they would do. This[^] link (notes for U. Toronto history lecture on the subject) suggests that you are correct that they were not close, but incorrect that they were not working on it. Certainly suspicion that Germany might achieve a nuclear weapon first was a primary motivator for the Manhattan project. A man is likely to mind his own business when it is worth minding. When it is not, he takes his mind off his own meaningless affairs by minding other people's business. - Eric Hoffer

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Losinger

                gotta tell ya... a group called "Students For War" should be put at the top of the FBI's watch list. the only group higher should be the "Death To The Great American Satan Group". -c


                When history comes, it always takes you by surprise.

                Bobber!

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Rob Graham
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                How quickly you want people on the FBI watch list when their opinion disagrees with yours...:omg::suss: Some ideas are so stupid that only an intellectual could have thought of them - George Orwell

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Rob Graham

                  How quickly you want people on the FBI watch list when their opinion disagrees with yours...:omg::suss: Some ideas are so stupid that only an intellectual could have thought of them - George Orwell

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Chris Losinger
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  oh don't be stupid. i'd have made the same comment if the group was "Students Who Want to Kill SUV Drivers" or "Students Who Think GWB Should Be Shaved and Painted Green".


                  When history comes, it always takes you by surprise.

                  Bobber!

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Chris Losinger

                    oh don't be stupid. i'd have made the same comment if the group was "Students Who Want to Kill SUV Drivers" or "Students Who Think GWB Should Be Shaved and Painted Green".


                    When history comes, it always takes you by surprise.

                    Bobber!

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Rob Graham
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Chris Losinger wrote: "Students Who Think GWB Should Be Shaved and Painted Green". Bob would object. The similarity might bee too stunning. Some ideas are so stupid that only an intellectual could have thought of them - George Orwell

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Rob Graham

                      peterchen wrote: The US had over 200 nukes before anyone else had even one. So stop your selfrighteous claims about the goods of a bomb, that never fell over your country. I never so much as suggested there was anything good about nuclear weapons. The point of mentioning that the logic of the time was that it would bring an early end to war with Japan was simply a reflection of the thinking of two generations ago that was used to justify the action. There was also no self-righteous intent, just a complaint over the sam old rant about the sins of my GRANDPARENTS... and a rant that does not lead to useful discourse, but merely offends. As for self-righteousness, was a nuclear weapon dropped on your country (or any country in your lifetime?). More rhetoric. peterchen wrote: So it would be ok for Saddam to ask Kim Il for a nuke, and drop it on New York, when this would make the US back up and he could claim less people died than in an attack on Iraq? And if the US doesn't back up, another nuke on LA would surely be justified? No, and by suggesting this you echo some of the very rhetoric that is being used to justify eliminating Saddam once and for all. The fact that you would use it as an argument only lends credence to that rhetoric..... peterchen wrote: The US didn't "narrowly beat germany" - germany wasn't even working on it: Einstein and otehrs were afraid they would do. This[^] link (notes for U. Toronto history lecture on the subject) suggests that you are correct that they were not close, but incorrect that they were not working on it. Certainly suspicion that Germany might achieve a nuclear weapon first was a primary motivator for the Manhattan project. A man is likely to mind his own business when it is worth minding. When it is not, he takes his mind off his own meaningless affairs by minding other people's business. - Eric Hoffer

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      peterchen
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      We could discuss for ages how much responsibility a country has for it's history... The world won't become a safer place by bombing Iraq, but these mustardheads abuse fearmongering imagery to suggest that. The reminder served as a reminder: that the US did "the unthinkable" first, and at least it's people claim it was the best for all involved - but the same act done to a US town is "unthinkable". Rob Graham wrote: you echo some of the very rhetoric that is being used to justify eliminating Saddam once and for all That was my sole intention. I don't suggest the US to "eat their own medicine", but at least they should stop prescribing what they don't like themseves. A soldier in the trenches can flee, can revolt, can surrender. A civilian in a town can not. For the self-righteous thing: My Hometown[^] was the first where an firestorm was caused intentionally. We had no Marshall plan for rebuilding, I grew up with the reminders of that night in my daily view, and still today there are a few scars. I'm not blaming or fishing for empathy, just telling the facts: I very well know how ruins in front of your door step look like.


                      If you go to war, you will destroy a great country a stoned greek chick to the richest man of the world
                      sighist | Agile Programming | doxygen

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P peterchen

                        We could discuss for ages how much responsibility a country has for it's history... The world won't become a safer place by bombing Iraq, but these mustardheads abuse fearmongering imagery to suggest that. The reminder served as a reminder: that the US did "the unthinkable" first, and at least it's people claim it was the best for all involved - but the same act done to a US town is "unthinkable". Rob Graham wrote: you echo some of the very rhetoric that is being used to justify eliminating Saddam once and for all That was my sole intention. I don't suggest the US to "eat their own medicine", but at least they should stop prescribing what they don't like themseves. A soldier in the trenches can flee, can revolt, can surrender. A civilian in a town can not. For the self-righteous thing: My Hometown[^] was the first where an firestorm was caused intentionally. We had no Marshall plan for rebuilding, I grew up with the reminders of that night in my daily view, and still today there are a few scars. I'm not blaming or fishing for empathy, just telling the facts: I very well know how ruins in front of your door step look like.


                        If you go to war, you will destroy a great country a stoned greek chick to the richest man of the world
                        sighist | Agile Programming | doxygen

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Michael A Barnhart
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        peterchen wrote: We could discuss for ages how much responsibility a country has for it's history... Agreed which is why I hate to see the comments "You did it first" being made. Would it be fair to you to point out what Germany was doing during the early 1940's? Or better yet what the Prussian and French armies did to the population of the Palatinate (my ancestors) in the 30 years war? (Loss of life of 97%.) Why can't we just agree this is where we are and come to terms on how to proceed? I do agree that the imagery was not proper. "I will find a new sig someday."

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Mike Gaskey

                          http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,79954,00.html[^] http://www.studentsforwar.org/hitler2.htm[^] http://www.studentsforwar.org/[^] Mike

                          J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jan larsen
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          "And for those who ask what has Saddam done to us, I ask what had the 9/11 hijackers done to us before 9/11?" Oh?, Ok!, I'm off to kill my neighbour, better him than me, you really don't know what those human are up to, do you?... Marchers chanted and carried signs that recalled familiar slogans such as "America — Love It or Leave It." This is the sort of things you only hear in Denmark from Skinheads and Nazis. It is amazing to see how many of the pro-war people confuses anti-war and anti-america, is it stupidity or provocation?. "After all it's just text at the end of the day. - Colin Davies "For example, when a VB programmer comes to my house, they may say 'does your pool need cleaning, sir ?' " - Christian Graus

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups