Google Coolness
-
-
What?!? Bing works? :laugh:
Dunno - it didn't do very well when I last looked, so I didn't look again...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952) Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
-
Nope: Works in FireFox as well. Oh, gawd, that means I need to run up IE...damn...sit here, twiddle thumbs...wait...wait for it...Nope. IE11 shows nowt.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952) Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
Quote:
Nope. IE11 shows nowt
Sharing this on Facebook would be a wasted endeavor then?
Well fads they come and fads they go. And God I love that rock and roll! Well the point was fast but it was too blunt to miss. Life handed us a paycheck, we said, "We worked harder than this!"
-
-
-
Sure, its an awesome :thumbsup: +5 for it.
Believe Yourself™
-
It is pretty nice, but I cannot believe how much it loads the CPU. :^) Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
My CPU was at 0.1% with that graph.
Getting information off the Internet is like taking a drink from a fire hydrant. - Mitchell Kapor
-
My CPU was at 0.1% with that graph.
Getting information off the Internet is like taking a drink from a fire hydrant. - Mitchell Kapor
That's weird. My Q9650 on WinXP was at 80% :omg:. I actually thought it was cool they managed to load the 4 cores equally - I did not expect that from something like that in a browser. I just tried it here at work where I have an i7-3770 running Windows 7, 64bit and I am seeing a very low CPU load. Something around 1-2%. It also looks smoother than on my system at home. Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
-
That's weird. My Q9650 on WinXP was at 80% :omg:. I actually thought it was cool they managed to load the 4 cores equally - I did not expect that from something like that in a browser. I just tried it here at work where I have an i7-3770 running Windows 7, 64bit and I am seeing a very low CPU load. Something around 1-2%. It also looks smoother than on my system at home. Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
SoMad wrote:
WinXP
I think I have isolated your problem.
Getting information off the Internet is like taking a drink from a fire hydrant. - Mitchell Kapor
-
SoMad wrote:
WinXP
I think I have isolated your problem.
Getting information off the Internet is like taking a drink from a fire hydrant. - Mitchell Kapor
:) Fair enough. I should be getting rid of XP, but this is a huge difference in performance if it is simply down to the OS. Much greater than I have ever seen before and I do think it is a bit surprising. Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
-
So who can come up with the coolest looking sample? Here's one: sin(x/y)+sin(y*x)[^] I like this one too: sin(5x/y)+tan(.0010*y*x)[^]
-
Doesn't work on IE 10 :sigh:
if(this.signature != "") { MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature); } else { MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found"); }
Does anyone knows why this doesn't work on IE even the latest (11)?
CEO at: - Rafaga Systems - Para Facturas - Modern Components for the moment...
-
Does anyone knows why this doesn't work on IE even the latest (11)?
CEO at: - Rafaga Systems - Para Facturas - Modern Components for the moment...
Because, as said before, nothing works on IE :suss: Basicly i think it's the lack of HTML 5 capability
if(this.signature != "") { MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature); } else { MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found"); }
