Is C# is fully object oriented or not?

[Lost User]

What exactly do you mean by "fully object oriented"? That doesn't seem to be a well-defined term.

[Wayne Gaylard]

Please can you define what you mean by well-defined term . :-D

Everyone dies - but not everyone lives

[Lost User]

Oh you :-D

[OriginalGriff]

See recursion.

Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952) Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)

[Wayne Gaylard]

Recursion.[^]

Everyone dies - but not everyone lives

[lukeer]

Not fully recoursive. This is.

Ciao, luker

[Wayne Gaylard]

Ok - you win!

Everyone dies - but not everyone lives

[pradeep surya]

C# is object oriented.

[Pete OHanlon]

As Bill points out, just how OO is it? Does the fact that it allows static methods and objects adhere to OO tenets?

[Pete OHanlon]

You have several excellent answers here, but I will throw a one into the mix - is a language that supports static methods and objects fully object oriented? Does that fit into a classical definition of OO?