I just can't take it no more!
-
-
Again - a common part of the immutable pattern. If there is only one way you can create a class from outside then you have complete control over its creation... What I don't understand is why the persistence layer needs to access the private members - why aren't the properties you need from the business class exposed as readonly?
-
Again - a common part of the immutable pattern. If there is only one way you can create a class from outside then you have complete control over its creation... What I don't understand is why the persistence layer needs to access the private members - why aren't the properties you need from the business class exposed as readonly?
Now explain the difference between the constructor and the static method, keeping in mind that the static method is not a factory. thing is, the only way to have SOME control over how an object is created is using the constructor. AutoMapper and Serialization don't even know about your method.
-
Now explain the difference between the constructor and the static method, keeping in mind that the static method is not a factory. thing is, the only way to have SOME control over how an object is created is using the constructor. AutoMapper and Serialization don't even know about your method.
That is the rub - auto-mapping and serialization of the business objects is the issue. Business objects shouldn't be persisted - there should be a specific shearing layer with its own classes for that (a repository or data access layer for example).
-
New PM! He has strong (& abysmal) opinions about development. That I just can't follow, that's bad.. :~ What to do!?! Some example All business class have all private constructor and private setter properties. They have a public static Create() method (mind you it's not a factory method, only create instance of that particular class) To set properties (when we pass the business object to the persistence layer) we use Automapper, which override the private attribute using reflection This afternoon we spend 2 hours to refactor 20 lines of code (in 2 method) that I had written (it was working) We had to stop because of time, but 3 classes, 6 methods, 200 lines of code later the new "improved" version was still not operational (improved version we have to duplicate at all time) And mind you this new "improved" version is not reusable. Only improve these particular 20 lines. I have to DUPLICATE the improved version for every single method I write... I just CAN'T DO IT! :(( :mad: :wtf: X|
My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
Quote:
New PM! He has strong (& abysmal) opinions about development.
Project Manager? The PMs I have worked with never knew anything about code. Their job was to manage the customer mostly.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
-
Quote:
New PM! He has strong (& abysmal) opinions about development.
Project Manager? The PMs I have worked with never knew anything about code. Their job was to manage the customer mostly.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Right, sounds more like a micro-manager to me.
You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.
-
Just like Sentenryu, constructor will be just as good for immutability. Better, they are overridable if you create a subclass And before you said 'haha, this prevent subclassing', there is the 'final' keyworkd for that!
My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
-
Quote:
New PM! He has strong (& abysmal) opinions about development.
Project Manager? The PMs I have worked with never knew anything about code. Their job was to manage the customer mostly.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
Haha, that must be it! ^^
My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
-
Just like Sentenryu, constructor will be just as good for immutability. Better, they are overridable if you create a subclass And before you said 'haha, this prevent subclassing', there is the 'final' keyworkd for that!
My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
The only language I can think of that the create method would be useful is C++ for use with templates and pointers, but it would have to be an instance method, so you can take a Base* and create an instance of the right derived type. I guess it could be useful for the same reason on C# or Java, but i see less reason to use it on those languages.
-
New PM! He has strong (& abysmal) opinions about development. That I just can't follow, that's bad.. :~ What to do!?! Some example All business class have all private constructor and private setter properties. They have a public static Create() method (mind you it's not a factory method, only create instance of that particular class) To set properties (when we pass the business object to the persistence layer) we use Automapper, which override the private attribute using reflection This afternoon we spend 2 hours to refactor 20 lines of code (in 2 method) that I had written (it was working) We had to stop because of time, but 3 classes, 6 methods, 200 lines of code later the new "improved" version was still not operational (improved version we have to duplicate at all time) And mind you this new "improved" version is not reusable. Only improve these particular 20 lines. I have to DUPLICATE the improved version for every single method I write... I just CAN'T DO IT! :(( :mad: :wtf: X|
My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
Micro-manager ? Had my fare share of those. The funny thing is that I wouldn't mind (that much) if anything they'd said made sence, but mostly it's just jibberish and buzz words coming out... They shouldn't interfere with your coding though. Can you escalate?
V.
(MQOTD rules and previous solutions) -
Micro-manager ? Had my fare share of those. The funny thing is that I wouldn't mind (that much) if anything they'd said made sence, but mostly it's just jibberish and buzz words coming out... They shouldn't interfere with your coding though. Can you escalate?
V.
(MQOTD rules and previous solutions)I think he is trying to teach me how to improve upon an ASP.NET MVC application using 1995 Java techniques! :~
My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
-
Micro-manager ? Had my fare share of those. The funny thing is that I wouldn't mind (that much) if anything they'd said made sence, but mostly it's just jibberish and buzz words coming out... They shouldn't interfere with your coding though. Can you escalate?
V.
(MQOTD rules and previous solutions)My boss said we can relocate you somewhere else if need be.... But I quite like the other people! And I found the way to cope, just ignore his gibberish! Luckily it's possible! ^^
My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
-
My boss said we can relocate you somewhere else if need be.... But I quite like the other people! And I found the way to cope, just ignore his gibberish! Luckily it's possible! ^^
My programming get away... The Blog... DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!