Conflicting Author?
-
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote:
Anyways I believe the internet itself started as a politically recognized phenomenon only long after the periods of these people right?
I think Einstein said this first.
Blue Waffler wrote:
Einstein
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet[^] states this: The origins of the Internet date back to research commissioned by the United States government in the 1960s to build robust, fault-tolerant communication via computer networks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstien[^] states his timeline as 14 March 1879 to 18 April 1955
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage You can not step into the same river twice.
-
I just came across some one's sig and it shows the quote "The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine" from 'Winston Churchill (1944)'. But Google takes me to http://funny2.com/fakequotes.htm[^] indicating the quotation is from Abraham Lincoln. Anyways I believe the internet itself started as a politically recognized phenomenon only long after the periods of these people right? Any comments?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage You can not step into the same river twice.
-
Well at the moment you are correct, but if time travel is invented in the future then we could hypothetically go back in time and get Winston Churchill or Abraham Lincoln to say these things for irony's sake.
Quote:
time travel is invented in the future then we could hypothetically go back in
Let's assume that we invent time travel in the future. This means that instead of changing lets say WWI or WWII or any other mischief, we are saying that it was the best that could have happened? :doh:
-
Blue Waffler wrote:
Einstein
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet[^] states this: The origins of the Internet date back to research commissioned by the United States government in the 1960s to build robust, fault-tolerant communication via computer networks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstien[^] states his timeline as 14 March 1879 to 18 April 1955
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage You can not step into the same river twice.
What? you believe everything you read on Wiki? You do realize that DD can edit it, don't you?
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952) Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
-
Blue Waffler wrote:
Einstein
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet[^] states this: The origins of the Internet date back to research commissioned by the United States government in the 1960s to build robust, fault-tolerant communication via computer networks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstien[^] states his timeline as 14 March 1879 to 18 April 1955
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage You can not step into the same river twice.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote:
You can not step into the same river twice.
True, but once your feet are wet no-one will care which river it's from.* * Queen Marie-Antoinette as she was led to meet the Guillotine.
-
Quote:
time travel is invented in the future then we could hypothetically go back in
Let's assume that we invent time travel in the future. This means that instead of changing lets say WWI or WWII or any other mischief, we are saying that it was the best that could have happened? :doh:
Well, yes. Without WWII and WWIII and the impetus it gave to research, we wouldn't have been able to stop that asteroid from hitting the planet. Or was that next year? I always forget.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952) Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
-
It is Leslie Nielsen who said it first. Actually, he was the first to say anything.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus Entropy isn't what it used to.
-
Quote:
time travel is invented in the future then we could hypothetically go back in
Let's assume that we invent time travel in the future. This means that instead of changing lets say WWI or WWII or any other mischief, we are saying that it was the best that could have happened? :doh:
Whenever I am presented by the notion that travelling through time at anything other than 1 s/s is even remotely possible I offer the following - if at any time in the past or future of life on this, or any other, planet, a being should invent time travel then we would have known about it since before the earliest records. I think that was said by George VII.
-
Blue Waffler wrote:
Einstein
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet[^] states this: The origins of the Internet date back to research commissioned by the United States government in the 1960s to build robust, fault-tolerant communication via computer networks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstien[^] states his timeline as 14 March 1879 to 18 April 1955
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage You can not step into the same river twice.
That's definitely wrong, and is a case in point that you shouldn't believe anything you read on the internet.
-
Well, yes. Without WWII and WWIII and the impetus it gave to research, we wouldn't have been able to stop that asteroid from hitting the planet. Or was that next year? I always forget.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952) Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
-
Chuck Norris was scared of the kid who sucked his thumb in class. At high school.
-
Whenever I am presented by the notion that travelling through time at anything other than 1 s/s is even remotely possible I offer the following - if at any time in the past or future of life on this, or any other, planet, a being should invent time travel then we would have known about it since before the earliest records. I think that was said by George VII.
Now you are just making sh*t up :laugh:
-
Well at the moment you are correct, but if time travel is invented in the future then we could hypothetically go back in time and get Winston Churchill or Abraham Lincoln to say these things for irony's sake.
I just recently bought a time machine, but having tried it once I don't think I'm going to buy it.
-
Quote:
time travel is invented in the future then we could hypothetically go back in
Let's assume that we invent time travel in the future. This means that instead of changing lets say WWI or WWII or any other mischief, we are saying that it was the best that could have happened? :doh:
-
That's definitely wrong, and is a case in point that you shouldn't believe anything you read on the internet.
Blue Waffler wrote:
is a case in point that you shouldn't believe anything you read on the internet
Perhaps it recursively provides an affirmation on the original quote too. :)
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage You can not step into the same river twice.
-
Kenneth Haugland wrote:
Let's assume that we invent time travel in the future.
I'm going to assume that we invent time travel in the past.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
Thats so pre-modulus[^] planning
-
Now you are just making sh*t up :laugh:
Well? You started it!
-
Well? You started it!
-
Well? You started it!
THere must be a quote somewhere on the internet saying you started it. :-D
-
I just came across some one's sig and it shows the quote "The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine" from 'Winston Churchill (1944)'. But Google takes me to http://funny2.com/fakequotes.htm[^] indicating the quotation is from Abraham Lincoln. Anyways I believe the internet itself started as a politically recognized phenomenon only long after the periods of these people right? Any comments?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar Personal Homepage You can not step into the same river twice.
