Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C / C++ / MFC
  4. can anyone help how to find summation of float number?

can anyone help how to find summation of float number?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C / C++ / MFC
helptutorialquestion
28 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    Are you sure that sum contains zero at the beginning of the loop? In the statement:

    float f= ((float)rand()/(float)(RAND_MAX))*a;

    what is the value of a? And since you are not printing any of the intervening values, how can you be sure the final sum is not correct?

    M Offline
    M Offline
    mybm1
    wrote on last edited by
    #14

    for(i=0;i<5;i++)
    {
    float f= ((float)rand()/(float)(RAND_MAX))*a; //rand return integer value from 0 to RAND_MAX(system dependent)
    //float y[5];

            printf("%f\\t",f);
    
    
            y=square(f);
            printf("\\t\\t%f\\n",y);
            
               }
    
    
    
    
        for(i=0;i<5;i++)
                     {  //float y,sum;
                    float f= ((float)rand()/(float)(RAND\_MAX))\*a;
                    y=square(f);
                        sum +=y;
                 }
        printf("\\n Summation Of Square Number is:=%f\\t\\n",sum);
    

    i have print at the 1st for loop...:(

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M mybm1

      thanks for your contribution but this is the logic i apllied for summation 'result +=array[i]' but this is giving the approximate answer not the exact one.

      enhzflepE Offline
      enhzflepE Offline
      enhzflep
      wrote on last edited by
      #15

      Except for a rather small subset of numbers, calculations with computers involving floating-point numbers are approximate. Integer arithmetic doesn't suffer from this pitfall. However, if you are talking about the result of the code I posted - then consider reviewing the printf statements - in each of them I have used the %.2f format specifier to tell printf to only print 2 digits after the decimal place. The point is - the answer is as close to exact as floats will give you, it is only the display that is (grossly) approximate. :) You can get a less approximate result printed if you change the print specifiers to %f

      CPalliniC M 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • M mybm1

        i tried using array but seem it not working can u please help me out with code making modification...actual thing what i want is to do the summation of all the generated random number which is store at b.

        CPalliniC Offline
        CPalliniC Offline
        CPallini
        wrote on last edited by
        #16

        #include

        #define N 5

        double summation(double g[], int size);

        int main()
        {
        double a[N] =
        {
        0.035679,
        0.079935,
        0.033320,
        0.042424,
        0.012387
        };

        double s[N];

        int i;
        for (i=0; i
        THESE PEOPLE REALLY BOTHER ME!! How can they know what you should do without knowing what you want done?!?!
        -- C++ FQA Lite

        In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • enhzflepE enhzflep

          Except for a rather small subset of numbers, calculations with computers involving floating-point numbers are approximate. Integer arithmetic doesn't suffer from this pitfall. However, if you are talking about the result of the code I posted - then consider reviewing the printf statements - in each of them I have used the %.2f format specifier to tell printf to only print 2 digits after the decimal place. The point is - the answer is as close to exact as floats will give you, it is only the display that is (grossly) approximate. :) You can get a less approximate result printed if you change the print specifiers to %f

          CPalliniC Offline
          CPalliniC Offline
          CPallini
          wrote on last edited by
          #17

          As far as I can understand, he is trying to imlpement the "Kahan summation algorithm"[^].

          THESE PEOPLE REALLY BOTHER ME!! How can they know what you should do without knowing what you want done?!?! -- C++ FQA Lite

          In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

          M enhzflepE 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • CPalliniC CPallini

            As far as I can understand, he is trying to imlpement the "Kahan summation algorithm"[^].

            THESE PEOPLE REALLY BOTHER ME!! How can they know what you should do without knowing what you want done?!?! -- C++ FQA Lite

            M Offline
            M Offline
            mybm1
            wrote on last edited by
            #18

            CPallini i have given just for 5 number as demo but in real my count is above 60000 ?and i am searching for the summation for all the 60000+ value which give correct result.it wouldt be possible for what?

            CPalliniC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • CPalliniC CPallini

              As far as I can understand, he is trying to imlpement the "Kahan summation algorithm"[^].

              THESE PEOPLE REALLY BOTHER ME!! How can they know what you should do without knowing what you want done?!?! -- C++ FQA Lite

              enhzflepE Offline
              enhzflepE Offline
              enhzflep
              wrote on last edited by
              #19

              Seems like a reasonable assumption to me. I'd seen your mention of it earlier, but hadn't seen a confirmation of this so guessed (wrongly?) where the problem lay. Thanks for the impetus to re-investigate the method - I seem to remember using it for something a while back, but brain-rot defeats me.. :sigh:

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • enhzflepE enhzflep

                Seems like a reasonable assumption to me. I'd seen your mention of it earlier, but hadn't seen a confirmation of this so guessed (wrongly?) where the problem lay. Thanks for the impetus to re-investigate the method - I seem to remember using it for something a while back, but brain-rot defeats me.. :sigh:

                M Offline
                M Offline
                mybm1
                wrote on last edited by
                #20

                can u please kindly explain your assumption?becoz een though i put %.2f its doesnot seem much change in the answer that y..

                enhzflepE 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M mybm1

                  CPallini i have given just for 5 number as demo but in real my count is above 60000 ?and i am searching for the summation for all the 60000+ value which give correct result.it wouldt be possible for what?

                  CPalliniC Offline
                  CPalliniC Offline
                  CPallini
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #21

                  You cannot modify my program for processing more items, can you? :rolleyes:

                  THESE PEOPLE REALLY BOTHER ME!! How can they know what you should do without knowing what you want done?!?! -- C++ FQA Lite

                  In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M mybm1

                    can u please kindly explain your assumption?becoz een though i put %.2f its doesnot seem much change in the answer that y..

                    enhzflepE Offline
                    enhzflepE Offline
                    enhzflep
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #22

                    Certainly. Both your code and the pseudo-code in the wiki page that CPallini linked to appear quite similar. This, combined with your mention of the result only being an approximation seems to further support your need for a more accurate result of summing. (which the method may facilitate)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M mybm1

                      for(i=0;i<5;i++)
                      {
                      float f= ((float)rand()/(float)(RAND_MAX))*a; //rand return integer value from 0 to RAND_MAX(system dependent)
                      //float y[5];

                              printf("%f\\t",f);
                      
                      
                              y=square(f);
                              printf("\\t\\t%f\\n",y);
                              
                                 }
                      
                      
                      
                      
                          for(i=0;i<5;i++)
                                       {  //float y,sum;
                                      float f= ((float)rand()/(float)(RAND\_MAX))\*a;
                                      y=square(f);
                                          sum +=y;
                                   }
                          printf("\\n Summation Of Square Number is:=%f\\t\\n",sum);
                      

                      i have print at the 1st for loop...:(

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #23

                      And in the second loop you will have a different set of numbers, as returned by the calls to rand(). I also cannot find a reference to square, is this another function in your code?

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • CPalliniC CPallini

                        You cannot modify my program for processing more items, can you? :rolleyes:

                        THESE PEOPLE REALLY BOTHER ME!! How can they know what you should do without knowing what you want done?!?! -- C++ FQA Lite

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        mybm1
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #24

                        :-D thank you finally i got it after full torture to u and others too..

                        CPalliniC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • enhzflepE enhzflep

                          Except for a rather small subset of numbers, calculations with computers involving floating-point numbers are approximate. Integer arithmetic doesn't suffer from this pitfall. However, if you are talking about the result of the code I posted - then consider reviewing the printf statements - in each of them I have used the %.2f format specifier to tell printf to only print 2 digits after the decimal place. The point is - the answer is as close to exact as floats will give you, it is only the display that is (grossly) approximate. :) You can get a less approximate result printed if you change the print specifiers to %f

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          mybm1
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #25

                          omg u were right ,finally i got the problem was only with the where i gave the print statement..

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            And in the second loop you will have a different set of numbers, as returned by the calls to rand(). I also cannot find a reference to square, is this another function in your code?

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            mybm1
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #26

                            ya it is thank fren i got it...matter was with the printf statement i gav at second loop ,wen i pass the printf statement inside the 1st loop itself n removing the second for loop as condition where same ...den i got the exact answer..

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M mybm1

                              :-D thank you finally i got it after full torture to u and others too..

                              CPalliniC Offline
                              CPalliniC Offline
                              CPallini
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #27

                              You are welcome.

                              THESE PEOPLE REALLY BOTHER ME!! How can they know what you should do without knowing what you want done?!?! -- C++ FQA Lite

                              In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M mybm1

                                #include
                                #include
                                #include

                                float summation(float g);
                                int main(int argc,int *argv[])
                                {
                                srand(12345);
                                float z;
                                float a=0.2,y=0.0;
                                int i;
                                for(i=0;i<5;i++)
                                {
                                float b=((float)rand()/(float)(RAND_MAX))*a;
                                printf("%f\n",b);

                                z=summation(b);
                                }
                                printf("summation:\n%f\n",z);
                                return 0;
                                }
                                //=========================================================
                                float summation(float g)
                                {
                                int i;
                                float y[5],sum =0.0;
                                float c=0.0;

                                		for(i=1;i<5;i++)
                                			{
                                				float z=y\[i\]-c;
                                				float t = sum+z;
                                				c=(t-sum)-z;
                                				sum=t;
                                				return sum;
                                				//printf("\\n\\n%f\\t=",sum);
                                			}
                                

                                }

                                output 0.035679 0.079935 0.033320 0.042424 0.012387 summation: 0.000000 :( :( :( :(

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Satya Chamakuri
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #28

                                hi, I don't know what's the use of summation in your code. If you want summation of float numbers generated numbers only means, the following piece of code is enough i guess.. See once

                                srand(12345);
                                float z=0.0;
                                float a=0.2,y=0.0;
                                int i;
                                for(i=0;i<5;i++)
                                {
                                float b=((float)rand()/(float)(RAND_MAX))*a;
                                printf("%f\n",b);

                                    z=z+b;
                                }
                                printf("summation:\\n%f\\n",z);
                                
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups